Literature DB >> 28557495

Working memory load and the retro-cue effect: A diffusion model account.

Peter Shepherdson1, Klaus Oberauer1, Alessandra S Souza1.   

Abstract

Retro-cues (i.e., cues presented between the offset of a memory array and the onset of a probe) have consistently been found to enhance performance in working memory tasks, sometimes ameliorating the deleterious effects of increased memory load. However, the mechanism by which retro-cues exert their influence remains a matter of debate. To inform this debate, we applied a hierarchical diffusion model to data from 4 change detection experiments using single item, location-specific probes (i.e., a local recognition task) with either visual or verbal memory stimuli. Results showed that retro-cues enhanced the quality of information entering the decision process-especially for visual stimuli-and decreased the time spent on nondecisional processes. Further, cues interacted with memory load primarily on nondecision time, decreasing or abolishing load effects. To explain these findings, we propose an account whereby retro-cues act primarily to reduce the time taken to access the relevant representation in memory upon probe presentation, and in addition protect cued representations from visual interference. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28557495     DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000448

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  7 in total

1.  Tracking attentional states: Assessing the relationship between sustained and selective focused attention in visual working memory.

Authors:  Andra Arnicane; Alessandra S Souza
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Mnemonic attention in analogy to perceptual attention: harmony but not uniformity.

Authors:  Sizhu Han; Yixuan Ku
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-07-09

3.  Attention and binding in visual working memory: Two forms of attention and two kinds of buffer storage.

Authors:  Graham J Hitch; Richard J Allen; Alan D Baddeley
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Selection in working memory is resource-demanding: Concurrent task effects on the retro-cue effect.

Authors:  Yin-Ting Lin; Edyta Sasin; Daryl Fougnie
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  A major role for retrieval and/or comparison in the set-size effects of change detection.

Authors:  James C Moreland; John Palmer; Geoffrey M Boynton
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Prioritized verbal working memory content biases ongoing action.

Authors:  Jacob A Miller; Anastasia Kiyonaga; Richard B Ivry; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Perceptual stimuli with novel bindings interfere with visual working memory.

Authors:  Peter Shepherdson
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-09-03       Impact factor: 2.199

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.