Literature DB >> 28557494

Identifying the locus of compatibility-based backward crosstalk: Evidence from an extended PRP paradigm.

Markus Janczyk1, Sandra Renas1, Moritz Durst1.   

Abstract

The backward crosstalk effect (BCE) in dual tasking means that characteristics of Task 2 of 2 subsequently performed tasks influence Task 1 performance. This observation indicates that certain features of the second response are already activated to some degree before the first response is selected. Therefore, the BCE challenges bottleneck models, which assume that Task 2 response selection does not begin until Task 1 response selection is finished. Instead, an extended model with a capacity-unlimited response activation stage prior to the bottleneck as the locus of the BCE was suggested. To determine the exact locus of the BCE within the stages of task processing, 5 experiments were carried out. Experiments 1 to 4 were psychological refractory period-like experiments with 3 subsequent tasks. A prebottleneck locus of the BCE was ruled out in Experiments 1 to 3 by using the locus of slack logic. Additionally, a postbottleneck locus of the BCE was ruled out in Experiment 4 by using the effect propagation logic. To further support this latter conclusion, Experiment 5 applied a go-signal manipulation. Taken together, the results of all 5 experiments strongly suggest that the BCE has its locus in the capacity-limited stage, which contradicts the widely accepted notion that a capacity-unlimited stage of response activation preceding response selection proper is the locus of the BCE. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28557494     DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000445

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  8 in total

Review 1.  Monitoring and control in multitasking.

Authors:  Stefanie Schuch; David Dignath; Marco Steinhauser; Markus Janczyk
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-02

2.  Action effect features, but not anatomical features, determine the Backward Crosstalk Effect: evidence from crossed-hands experiments.

Authors:  Sandra Renas; Moritz Durst; Markus Janczyk
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-06-15

3.  Item-specific proportion congruency (ISPC) modulates, but does not generate, the backward crosstalk effect.

Authors:  Sandra J Thomson; Ariana C Simone; Scott Watter
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2020-03-28

4.  Individual Strategies of Response Organization in Multitasking Are Stable Even at Risk of High Between-Task Interference.

Authors:  Roman Reinert; Jovita Brüning
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-04-06

5.  Disentangling stimulus and response compatibility as potential sources of backward crosstalk.

Authors:  Tobias Rieger; Jeff Miller
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Spatial ability contributes to memory for delayed intentions.

Authors:  Veit Kubik; Fabio Del Missier; Timo Mäntylä
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2020-08-08

7.  Two sources of task prioritization: The interplay of effector-based and task order-based capacity allocation in the PRP paradigm.

Authors:  Mareike A Hoffmann; Aleks Pieczykolan; Iring Koch; Lynn Huestegge
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Introspection about backward crosstalk in dual-task performance.

Authors:  Daniel Bratzke; Markus Janczyk
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2020-01-23
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.