Literature DB >> 28557471

The double-edged sword of leader charisma: Understanding the curvilinear relationship between charismatic personality and leader effectiveness.

Jasmine Vergauwe1, Bart Wille2, Joeri Hofmans3, Robert B Kaiser4, Filip De Fruyt1.   

Abstract

This study advanced knowledge on charisma by (a) introducing a new personality-based model to conceptualize and assess charisma and by (b) investigating curvilinear relationships between charismatic personality and leader effectiveness. Moreover, we delved deeper into this curvilinear association by (c) examining moderation by the leader's level of adjustment and by (d) testing a process model through which the effects of charismatic personality on effectiveness are explained with a consideration of specific leader behaviors. Study 1 validated HDS charisma (Hogan Development Survey) as a useful trait-based measure of charisma. In Study 2 a sample of leaders (N = 306) were assessed in the context of a 360-degree development center. In line with the too-much-of-a-good-thing effect, an inverted U-shaped relationship between charismatic personality and observer-rated leader effectiveness was found, indicating that moderate levels are better than low or high levels of charisma. Study 3 (N = 287) replicated this curvilinear relationship and further illustrated the moderating role of leader adjustment, in such a way that the inflection point after which the effects of charisma turn negative occurs at higher levels of charisma when adjustment is high. Nonlinear mediation modeling further confirmed that strategic and operational leader behaviors fully mediate the curvilinear relationship. Leaders low on charisma are less effective because they lack strategic behavior; highly charismatic leaders are less effective because they lack operational behavior. In sum, this work provides insight into the dispositional nature of charisma and uncovers the processes through which and conditions under which leader charisma translates into (in)effectiveness. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28557471     DOI: 10.1037/pspp0000147

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  5 in total

1.  Evaluating Response Shift in Statistical Mediation Analysis.

Authors:  A R Georgeson; Matthew J Valente; Oscar Gonzalez
Journal:  Adv Methods Pract Psychol Sci       Date:  2021-05-13

2.  Understanding Zhongyong Using a Zhongyong Approach: Re-examining the Non-linear Relationship Between Creativity and the Confucian Doctrine of the Mean.

Authors:  Ruixiang Gao; Shiqi Huang; Yujie Yao; Xiaoqin Liu; Yujun Zhou; Shijia Zhang; Shaohua Cai; Huang Zuo; Zehui Zhan; Lei Mo
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-06-15

3.  Organizational arrangements as a key to enhancing innovativeness and efficiency - analysis of a restructuring hospital in Finland.

Authors:  Anu Kajamaa; Pia Hurmelinna-Laukkanen
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 2.908

Review 4.  What's charisma got to do with it? Three faces of charismatic leadership and corporate social responsibility engagement.

Authors:  Jinyu Hu; Tanurima Dutta
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-07-22

5.  The Contribution of Peer Values to Children's Values and Behavior.

Authors:  Maya Benish-Weisman; Shaul Oreg; Yair Berson
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2021-06-18
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.