Abhishek Sharma1,2, Sahil Agrawal3, Aakash Garg4, Ajay Vallakati5, Carl J Lavie6, Gerald Helft7,8. 1. Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, State University of New York Downstate Medical Center, New York, New York. 2. Institute of Cardiovascular Science and Technology, Brooklyn, New York. 3. Division of Cardiology, St. Luke's University Health Network, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania. 4. Department of Medicine, St. Peter's University Hospital, Rutgers\Robert Wood Johnson Hospital, New Brunswick, New Jersey. 5. Division of Cardiology, Metrohealth Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio. 6. Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, John Ochsner Heart and Vascular Institute, Ochsner Clinical School-the University of Queensland School of Medicine, New Orleans, Lousiana. 7. Institut de Cardiologie, Hôpital Pitié-Salpétrière, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, boulevard de l'Hôpital, Paris, France. 8. Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, Hôpital Pitié-Salpétrière, Paris, France.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long term efficacy and safety of long duration DAPT (L-DAPT) compared to short duration DAPT (S-DAPT) after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation. METHODS: We searched Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the clinical impact of L-DAPT versus S-DAPT after DES and have mean follow up period of at least 2 years or longer. Primary end point was stent thrombosis (ST). Secondary endpoints were all-cause mortality, cardiac mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), target vessel revascularization (TVR), thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) major bleeding and stroke. Event rates were compared using a random effects model. RESULTS: We identified five RCTs in which 19,760 patients were randomized to S-DAPT (N = 9,810) and L-DAPT (n = 9,950), respectively. Compared with L-DAPT, S-DAPT was associated with higher rate of MI (odds ratio [OR] 1.48, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.04, 2.10]). There were no significant differences between S-DAPT and L-DAPT in terms of all cause mortality, cardiac mortality, ST, TVR or stroke (OR 0.90, 95% CI [0.73, 1.12]; OR 1.02, 95% CI [0.80, 1.30]; OR 1.59, 95% CI [0.77, 3.27]; OR 0.87 95% CI [0.67, 1.14]; and OR 1.08 95% CI [0.81, 1.46], respectively). However, rate of TIMI major bleeding was significantly lower with S-DAPT compared to L-DAPT (OR 0.64, 95% CI [0.41, 0.99]). CONCLUSIONS: In the present analysis of RCTs with longer follow up (2 years or longer), S-DAPT compared with L-DAPT, was associated with higher rate of MI and lower rate of major bleeding without any significant difference in the rates of all cause mortality, cardiac mortality, ST, TVR, and stroke.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long term efficacy and safety of long duration DAPT (L-DAPT) compared to short duration DAPT (S-DAPT) after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation. METHODS: We searched Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the clinical impact of L-DAPT versus S-DAPT after DES and have mean follow up period of at least 2 years or longer. Primary end point was stent thrombosis (ST). Secondary endpoints were all-cause mortality, cardiac mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), target vessel revascularization (TVR), thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) major bleeding and stroke. Event rates were compared using a random effects model. RESULTS: We identified five RCTs in which 19,760 patients were randomized to S-DAPT (N = 9,810) and L-DAPT (n = 9,950), respectively. Compared with L-DAPT, S-DAPT was associated with higher rate of MI (odds ratio [OR] 1.48, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.04, 2.10]). There were no significant differences between S-DAPT and L-DAPT in terms of all cause mortality, cardiac mortality, ST, TVR or stroke (OR 0.90, 95% CI [0.73, 1.12]; OR 1.02, 95% CI [0.80, 1.30]; OR 1.59, 95% CI [0.77, 3.27]; OR 0.87 95% CI [0.67, 1.14]; and OR 1.08 95% CI [0.81, 1.46], respectively). However, rate of TIMI major bleeding was significantly lower with S-DAPT compared to L-DAPT (OR 0.64, 95% CI [0.41, 0.99]). CONCLUSIONS: In the present analysis of RCTs with longer follow up (2 years or longer), S-DAPT compared with L-DAPT, was associated with higher rate of MI and lower rate of major bleeding without any significant difference in the rates of all cause mortality, cardiac mortality, ST, TVR, and stroke.