PURPOSE: Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) of articular cartilage is a promising technique for the early diagnosis of osteoarthritis (OA). However, in vivo diffusion tensor (DT) measurements suffer from low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) that can result in bias when estimating the six parameters of the full DT, thus reducing sensitivity. This study seeks to validate a simplified four-parameter DT model (zeppelin) for obtaining more robust and sensitive in vivo DTI biomarkers of cartilage. METHODS: We use simulations in a substrate to mimic changes during OA; and analytic simulations of the DT drawn from a range of fractional anisotropies (FA) measured with high-quality DT data from ex vivo human cartilage. We also use in vivo data from the knees of a healthy subject and two OA patients with Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grades 1 and 2. RESULTS: For simulated in vivo cartilage SNR (∼25) and anisotropy levels, the estimated mean values of MD from the DT and zeppelin models were identical to the ground truth values. However, zeppelin's FA is more accurate in measuring water restriction. More specifically, the FA estimations of the DT model were additionally biased by between +2% and +48% with respect to zeppelin values. Additionally, both mean diffusivity (MD) and FA of the zeppelin had lower parameter variance compared to the full DT (F-test, P < 0.05). We observe the same trends from in vivo values of patient data. CONCLUSION: The zeppelin is more robust than the full DT for cartilage diffusion anisotropy and SNR at levels typically encountered in clinical applications of articular cartilage. Magn Reson Med 79:1157-1164, 2018.
PURPOSE: Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) of articular cartilage is a promising technique for the early diagnosis of osteoarthritis (OA). However, in vivo diffusion tensor (DT) measurements suffer from low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) that can result in bias when estimating the six parameters of the full DT, thus reducing sensitivity. This study seeks to validate a simplified four-parameter DT model (zeppelin) for obtaining more robust and sensitive in vivo DTI biomarkers of cartilage. METHODS: We use simulations in a substrate to mimic changes during OA; and analytic simulations of the DT drawn from a range of fractional anisotropies (FA) measured with high-quality DT data from ex vivo humancartilage. We also use in vivo data from the knees of a healthy subject and two OA patients with Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grades 1 and 2. RESULTS: For simulated in vivo cartilage SNR (∼25) and anisotropy levels, the estimated mean values of MD from the DT and zeppelin models were identical to the ground truth values. However, zeppelin's FA is more accurate in measuring water restriction. More specifically, the FA estimations of the DT model were additionally biased by between +2% and +48% with respect to zeppelin values. Additionally, both mean diffusivity (MD) and FA of the zeppelin had lower parameter variance compared to the full DT (F-test, P < 0.05). We observe the same trends from in vivo values of patient data. CONCLUSION: The zeppelin is more robust than the full DT for cartilage diffusion anisotropy and SNR at levels typically encountered in clinical applications of articular cartilage. Magn Reson Med 79:1157-1164, 2018.
Authors: M T Nieminen; J Rieppo; J Töyräs; J M Hakumäki; J Silvennoinen; M M Hyttinen; H J Helminen; J S Jurvelin Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2001-09 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: José G Raya; Eike Dettmann; Mike Notohamiprodjo; Svetlana Krasnokutsky; Steven Abramson; Christian Glaser Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2014-05-10 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Uran Ferizi; Ignacio Rossi; Youjin Lee; Matin Lendhey; Jason Teplensky; Oran D Kennedy; Thorsten Kirsch; Jenny Bencardino; José G Raya Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2016-07-25 Impact factor: 3.737
Authors: Diego Jaramillo; Phuong Duong; Jie C Nguyen; Sogol Mostoufi-Moab; Michael K Nguyen; Andrew Moreau; Christian A Barrera; Shijie Hong; José G Raya Journal: Radiology Date: 2022-03-22 Impact factor: 29.146
Authors: Alejandra Duarte; Amparo Ruiz; Uran Ferizi; Jenny Bencardino; Steven B Abramson; Jonathan Samuels; Svetlana Krasnokutsky-Samuels; José G Raya Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2018-10-31 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Teodoro Martín Noguerol; Jose G Raya; Daniel E Wessell; Joan C Vilanova; Ignacio Rossi; Antonio Luna Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2019-08-23 Impact factor: 3.039