Adrian Lam1, Erica Okene2, Ankit Parikh2, Xiaodong Zhong3,4, Thor Tejada2, Michael Hoskins2, Michael Lloyd2, John N Oshinski1,4. 1. Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. 2. Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. 3. MR R&D Collaborations, Siemens Healthcare, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. 4. Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To develop a Shared K-space (SharK) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequence that combines angiographic and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) acquisitions to improve atrial wall segmentation and scar identification, and to develop a novel visualization method that quantifies scar encirclement of pulmonary veins postablation treatment for atrial fibrillation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A SharK sequence was developed and used at 3T to image the left atrium in 11 patients postcryoballoon ablation. The effects of sharing k-space between the angiographic and LGE acquisitions on the accuracy of scar were assessed. The left atrial wall was segmented and points about each pulmonary vein (PV) ostia were projected onto a bullseye to quantitatively compare PV encirclement. The parameters used to quantify encirclement were varied to perform a sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: Compared to using a complete set of k-space, total atrial scar differences were significant only when sharing >75% k-space (P = 0.014), and 90% sensitivity and specificity for identifying scar was achieved when sharing 50% k-space. In patients, the right PVs showed more intersubject variance in encirclement compared to the left PVs. A 100° anteroinferior portion of the left PVs was always encircled, while the superior segments of both right PVs was ablated in only 6/11 patients. CONCLUSION: A SharK sequence was developed to combine angiographic and LGE imaging for atrial wall segmentation and scar identification. The PV bullseye quantifies and localizes encirclement about the PVs. The left PVs showed a higher amount of scar encirclement and less variability compared to the right PVs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 Technical Efficacy: Stage 1 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2018;47:477-486.
PURPOSE: To develop a Shared K-space (SharK) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequence that combines angiographic and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) acquisitions to improve atrial wall segmentation and scar identification, and to develop a novel visualization method that quantifies scar encirclement of pulmonary veins postablation treatment for atrial fibrillation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A SharK sequence was developed and used at 3T to image the left atrium in 11 patients postcryoballoon ablation. The effects of sharing k-space between the angiographic and LGE acquisitions on the accuracy of scar were assessed. The left atrial wall was segmented and points about each pulmonary vein (PV) ostia were projected onto a bullseye to quantitatively compare PV encirclement. The parameters used to quantify encirclement were varied to perform a sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: Compared to using a complete set of k-space, total atrial scar differences were significant only when sharing >75% k-space (P = 0.014), and 90% sensitivity and specificity for identifying scar was achieved when sharing 50% k-space. In patients, the right PVs showed more intersubject variance in encirclement compared to the left PVs. A 100° anteroinferior portion of the left PVs was always encircled, while the superior segments of both right PVs was ablated in only 6/11 patients. CONCLUSION: A SharK sequence was developed to combine angiographic and LGE imaging for atrial wall segmentation and scar identification. The PV bullseye quantifies and localizes encirclement about the PVs. The left PVs showed a higher amount of scar encirclement and less variability compared to the right PVs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 Technical Efficacy: Stage 1 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2018;47:477-486.
Authors: Benjamin R Knowles; Dennis Caulfield; Michael Cooklin; C Aldo Rinaldi; Jaswinder Gill; Julian Bostock; Reza Razavi; Tobias Schaeffter; Kawal S Rhode Journal: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng Date: 2010-02-17 Impact factor: 4.538
Authors: O P Simonetti; R J Kim; D S Fieno; H B Hillenbrand; E Wu; J M Bundy; J P Finn; R M Judd Journal: Radiology Date: 2001-01 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Craig T January; L Samuel Wann; Joseph S Alpert; Hugh Calkins; Joaquin E Cigarroa; Joseph C Cleveland; Jamie B Conti; Patrick T Ellinor; Michael D Ezekowitz; Michael E Field; Katherine T Murray; Ralph L Sacco; William G Stevenson; Patrick J Tchou; Cynthia M Tracy; Clyde W Yancy Journal: Circulation Date: 2014-03-28 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Roy Beinart; Suhny Abbara; Andrew Blum; Maros Ferencik; Kevin Heist; Jeremy Ruskin; Moussa Mansour Journal: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Date: 2011-05-26
Authors: R J Kim; D S Fieno; T B Parrish; K Harris; E L Chen; O Simonetti; J Bundy; J P Finn; F J Klocke; R M Judd Journal: Circulation Date: 1999-11-09 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Hakan Oral; Bradley P Knight; Hiroshi Tada; Mehmet Ozaydin; Aman Chugh; Sohail Hassan; Christoph Scharf; Steve W K Lai; Radmira Greenstein; Frank Pelosi; S Adam Strickberger; Fred Morady Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-03-05 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Philipp Matthias Halbfass; Marcel Mitlacher; Oliver Turschner; Johannes Brachmann; Christian Mahnkopf Journal: Europace Date: 2015-01-21 Impact factor: 5.214
Authors: Mohammed N Khan; Pierre Jaïs; Jennifer Cummings; Luigi Di Biase; Prashanthan Sanders; David O Martin; Josef Kautzner; Steven Hao; Sakis Themistoclakis; Raffaele Fanelli; Domenico Potenza; Raimondo Massaro; Oussama Wazni; Robert Schweikert; Walid Saliba; Paul Wang; Amin Al-Ahmad; Salwa Beheiry; Pietro Santarelli; Randall C Starling; Antonio Dello Russo; Gemma Pelargonio; Johannes Brachmann; Volker Schibgilla; Aldo Bonso; Michela Casella; Antonio Raviele; Michel Haïssaguerre; Andrea Natale Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-10-23 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Douglas L Packer; Robert C Kowal; Kevin R Wheelan; James M Irwin; Jean Champagne; Peter G Guerra; Marc Dubuc; Vivek Reddy; Linda Nelson; Richard G Holcomb; John W Lehmann; Jeremy N Ruskin Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2013-03-21 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Dana C Peters; John V Wylie; Thomas H Hauser; Kraig V Kissinger; René M Botnar; Vidal Essebag; Mark E Josephson; Warren J Manning Journal: Radiology Date: 2007-06 Impact factor: 11.105