Literature DB >> 28556272

Up to 89% of neonates received antibiotics in cross-sectional Indian study including those with no infections and unclear diagnoses.

Camilla Hauge1, Cecilia Stålsby Lundborg1, Jagdish Mandaliya2, Gaetano Marrone1, Megha Sharma1,3.   

Abstract

AIM: There is a global lack of data on antibiotic prescribing for neonates. This study compared antibiotic prescribing practices in the neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) of two private-sector, tertiary-level hospitals.
METHODS: A three-year, cross-sectional study was conducted from 2008 to 2011 in the NICUs of a teaching and nonteaching hospital in the Ujjain district of India. The data were analysed using methods recommended by the World Health Organization.
RESULTS: Of the 1789 inpatients, 89% (1399/1572) in the nonteaching hospital and 71% (154/217) in the teaching hospital were prescribed antibiotics and 123 patients died. All the antibiotics were prescribed empirically and cephalosporins and aminoglycosides were the most commonly prescribed subclasses. Fixed-dose combinations of cephalosporins were commonly prescribed in the nonteaching hospital. Neonatal sepsis was the most common diagnosis, in more than 30% of patients, and more than 93% neonates with sepsis were prescribed antibiotics. In addition, 40% of neonates in the nonteaching hospital were admitted for observation and were frequently prescribed antibiotics.
CONCLUSION: These two Indian NICUs prescribed antibiotics for noninfectious or unclear diagnoses in addition to prescribing combinations of broad-spectrum antibiotics. Such practices increase the global risk of treatment failure, neonatal mortality rates and antibiotic resistance. ©2017 Foundation Acta Paediatrica. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antibiotic prescribing; Antibiotic resistance; Neonatal intensive care unit; Neonatal sepsis; Teaching hospital

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28556272     DOI: 10.1111/apa.13935

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Paediatr        ISSN: 0803-5253            Impact factor:   2.299


  5 in total

1.  Advanced neonatal medicine in China: Is newborn ward capacity associated with inpatient antibiotic usage?

Authors:  Yi Ge; Selma Chipenda Dansokho; Xiang-Peng Liao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Effect of Weekly Antibiotic Round on Antibiotic Use in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit as Antibiotic Stewardship Strategy.

Authors:  Bo Wang; Geng Li; Fei Jin; Jingwen Weng; Yaguang Peng; Shixiao Dong; Jingyuan Liu; Jie Luo; Hailan Wu; Yanhua Shen; Yao Meng; Xiaoling Wang; Mingyan Hei
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 3.418

3.  Overuse of antibiotics in maternity and neonatal wards, a descriptive report from public hospitals in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.

Authors:  Mwaka A Kakolwa; Susannah L Woodd; Alexander M Aiken; Fatuma Manzi; Giorgia Gon; Wendy J Graham; Abdunoor M Kabanywanyi
Journal:  Antimicrob Resist Infect Control       Date:  2021-10-09       Impact factor: 4.887

4.  Trends, relationships and case attribution of antibiotic resistance between children and environmental sources in rural India.

Authors:  Joseph Mitchell; Manju Purohit; Chris P Jewell; Jonathan M Read; Gaetano Marrone; Vishal Diwan; Cecilia Stålsby Lundborg
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Point prevalence surveys of antimicrobial use among eight neonatal intensive care units in India: 2016.

Authors:  Sumanth Gandra; Gerardo Alvarez-Uria; Srinivas Murki; Sanjeev K Singh; Ravishankar Kanithi; Dasaratha R Jinka; Ashok K Chikkappa; Sreeram Subramanian; Anita Sharma; Dhanya Dharmapalan; Hemasree Kandraju; Anil Kumar Vasudevan; Onkaraiah Tunga; Akhila Akula; Yingfen Hsia; Mike Sharland; Ramanan Laxminarayan
Journal:  Int J Infect Dis       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 3.623

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.