Literature DB >> 28556235

Genotoxicity testing approaches for the safety assessment of substances used in food contact materials prior to their authorization in the European Union.

Claudia Bolognesi1,2, Anna F Castoldi3, Riccardo Crebelli4, Eric Barthélémy3, Daniela Maurici5, Detlef Wölfle2,6, Katharina Volk3, Laurence Castle2.   

Abstract

Food contact materials are all materials and articles intended to come directly or indirectly into contact with food. Before being included in the positive European "Union list" of authorized substances (monomers, other starting substances and additives) for plastic food contact materials, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) must assess their safety "in use". If relevant for risk, the safety of the main impurities, reaction and degradation products originating from the manufacturing process is also evaluated. Information on genotoxicity is always required irrespective of the extent of migration and the resulting human exposure, in view of the theoretical lack of threshold for genotoxic events. The 2008 EFSA approach, requiring the testing of food contact materials in three in vitro mutagenicity tests, though still acceptable, is now superseded by the 2011 EFSA Scientific Committee's recommendation for only two complementary tests including a bacterial gene mutation test and an in vitro micronucleus test, to detect two main genetic endpoints (i.e., gene mutations and chromosome aberrations). Follow-up of in vitro positive results depends on the type of genetic effect and on the substance's systemic availability. In this study, we provide an analysis of the data on genotoxicity testing gathered by EFSA on food contact materials for the period 1992-2015. We also illustrate practical examples of the approaches that EFSA took when evaluating "non standard" food contact chemicals (e.g., polymeric additives, oligomer or other reaction mixtures, and nanosubstances). Additionally, EFSA's experience gained from using non testing methods and/or future possibilities in this area are discussed. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 58:361-374, 2017.
© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  in vitro genotoxicity; in vivo genotoxicity; risk assessment

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28556235     DOI: 10.1002/em.22094

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen        ISSN: 0893-6692            Impact factor:   3.216


  3 in total

1.  Applied genetic toxicology: From principles to practice.

Authors:  Catherine F Gibbons; Matthew J LeBaron
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.579

2.  Genotoxicity and pharmacokinetic characterization of Cereus jamacaru ethanolic extract in rats.

Authors:  Iris Ucella de Medeiros; Rhoza Araújo de Medeiros; Raul Henandes Bortolin; Fernando Márlisson de Queiroz; Vivian Nogueira Silbiger; Stephan Pflugmacher; Aline Schwarz
Journal:  Biosci Rep       Date:  2019-01-18       Impact factor: 3.840

3.  Direct Comparison of the Lowest Effect Concentrations of Mutagenic Reference Substances in Two Ames Test Formats.

Authors:  Bernhard Rainer; Elisabeth Pinter; Lukas Prielinger; Chiara Coppola; Maricel Marin-Kuan; Benoit Schilter; Silvia Apprich; Manfred Tacker
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2021-06-29
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.