Literature DB >> 28556233

Poor peripheral blood stem cell mobilization affects long-term outcomes in multiple myeloma patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation.

Jan S Moreb1, Michael Byrne2, Ilicia Shugarman1, Fei Zou3, Sican Xiong3, William S May1, Maxim Norkin1, John Hiemenz1, Randall Brown1, Christopher Cogle1, John R Wingard1, Jack W Hsu1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) mobilization is routinely undertaken prior to autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). A number of studies have identified risk factors for poor PBSC mobilization, however, little data exists to correlate mobilization with disease-specific outcomes in this patient population. Prospective work in MM has demonstrated similar outcomes in a homogenous patient population.
METHODS: In this single institution analysis, we retrospectively studied the impact of poor PBSC mobilization on progression free survival (PFS) and OS in MM patients undergoing PBSC mobilization. Poor mobilizers are defined as patients that collected < 4 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg over maximum of 5 apheresis days, or those that required ≥2 mobilization cycles to achieve this target.
RESULTS: We confirm that poor PBSC mobilization is significantly associated with a shortened PFS (P = .0012) and OS (P = .0005) compared with good mobilizers. Our univariate analysis also shows that independent risk factors for poor mobilization include male gender, higher ideal body weight, and a greater median number of lines of chemotherapy prior to PBSC mobilization. However, by multivariate analysis, only number of prior lines of chemotherapy remains significantly predictive of poor mobilization (Odds ratio 1.857, P = .0095). The use of high-dose G-CSF (> 10 mcg/kg/day) and/or plerixafor can significantly improve mobilization and ASCT chances in this population. DISCUSSION: These data indicate that poor mobilization can be predictable and is associated with more aggressive disease biology and worse outcomes, warranting intensive post-ASCT management.
© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  autologous stem cell transplant; disease biology; multiple myeloma; plerixafor; poor mobilization; prognosis

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28556233     DOI: 10.1002/jca.21556

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Apher        ISSN: 0733-2459            Impact factor:   2.821


  11 in total

1.  Clinical outcomes of multiple myeloma patients who undergo autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant with G-CSF or G-CSF and plerixafor mobilized grafts.

Authors:  Harsh Shah; Seongho Kim; Paramveer Singh; Asif Alavi; Voravit Ratanatharathorn; Lois Ayash; Joseph Uberti; Abhinav Deol
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 10.047

2.  Clinical Outcomes in Multiple Myeloma Post-Autologous Transplantation-A Single Centre Experience.

Authors:  Uday Kulkarni; Anup J Devasia; Anu Korula; N A Fouzia; P N Nisham; Yasir J Samoon; Kavitha M Lakshmi; Aby Abraham; Alok Srivastava; Vikram Mathews; Biju George
Journal:  Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus       Date:  2018-07-21       Impact factor: 0.900

3.  Signaling of the Complement Cleavage Product Anaphylatoxin C5a Through C5aR (CD88) Contributes to Pharmacological Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization.

Authors:  Kamila Bujko; Sylwia Rzeszotek; Kai Hoehlig; Jun Yan; Axel Vater; Mariusz Z Ratajczak
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 5.739

4.  [Thoughts on autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and mobilization in Chinese patients with non Hodgkin's lymphoma].

Authors:  J Zhu
Journal:  Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2020-01-14

5.  [Advances in mobilization of autologous hematopoietic stem cells].

Authors:  H Chen; K Y Liu
Journal:  Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2019-10-14

6.  Results from a multicenter, noninterventional registry study for multiple myeloma patients who received stem cell mobilization regimens with and without plerixafor.

Authors:  Curly Morris; Christian Chabannon; Tamas Masszi; Nigel Russell; Hareth Nahi; Guido Kobbe; Marta Krejci; Holger W Auner; David Pohlreich; Patrick Hayden; Grzegorz W Basak; Stig Lenhoff; Nicolaas Schaap; Anja van Biezen; Cora Knol; Simona Iacobelli; Qianying Liu; Marina Celanovic; Laurent Garderet; Nicolaus Kröger
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 5.483

7.  Safety and Effectiveness of Plerixafor for Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Mobilization in Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation: Results of a Post-Marketing Surveillance Study.

Authors:  Nobuhiro Tsukada; Momoko Nishikori; Hiroaki Goto; Rie Kanamori; Satoshi Nishina; Takashi Seto; Shinsuke Iida
Journal:  Drugs Real World Outcomes       Date:  2021-08-29

8.  High Efficacy of Stem Cell Mobilization With Etoposide+Cytarabine Plus G-CSF in Patients With Multiple Myeloma.

Authors:  Zhijuan Zhu; Xiaofan Li; Yiping Liu; Ping Chen; Xianling Chen; Hua Li; Jiafu Huang; Yuanzhong Chen; Nainong Li
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 6.244

9.  Plerixafor stem cell mobilization in Japanese children: A post-marketing study.

Authors:  Hiroaki Goto; Rie Kanamori; Satoshi Nishina; Takashi Seto
Journal:  Pediatr Int       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 1.617

Review 10.  Getting blood out of a stone: Identification and management of patients with poor hematopoietic cell mobilization.

Authors:  Jian Chen; Hillard M Lazarus; Parastoo B Dahi; Scott Avecilla; Sergio A Giralt
Journal:  Blood Rev       Date:  2020-10-31       Impact factor: 10.626

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.