Literature DB >> 28556024

Cancer of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction-Major changes in the American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition cancer staging manual.

Thomas W Rice1, Donna M Gress2, Deepa T Patil3, Wayne L Hofstetter4, David P Kelsen5, Eugene H Blackstone6.   

Abstract

Answer questions and earn CME/CNE New to the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Cancer Staging Manual for epithelial cancers of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction are separate, temporally related cancer classifications: 1) before treatment decision (clinical); 2) after esophagectomy alone (pathologic); and 3) after preresection therapy followed by esophagectomy (postneoadjuvant pathologic). The addition of clinical and postneoadjuvant pathologic stage groupings was driven by a lack of correspondence of survival, and thus prognosis, between both clinical and postneoadjuvant pathologic cancer categories (facts about the cancer) and pathologic categories. This was revealed by a machine-learning analysis of 6-continent data from the Worldwide Esophageal Cancer Collaboration, with consensus of the AJCC Upper GI Expert Panel. Survival is markedly affected by histopathologic cell type (squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma) in clinically and pathologically staged patients, requiring separate stage grouping for each cell type. However, postneoadjuvant pathologic stage groups are identical. For the future, more refined and granular data are needed. This requires: 1) more accurate clinical staging; 2) innovative solutions to pathologic staging challenges in endoscopically resected cancers; 3) integration of genomics into staging; and 4) precision cancer care with targeted therapy. It is the responsibility of the oncology team to accurately determine and record registry data, which requires eliminating both common errors and those related to incompleteness and inconsistency. Despite the new complexity of eighth edition staging of cancers of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction, these key concepts and new directions will facilitate precision cancer care. CA Cancer J Clin 2017;67:304-317.
© 2017 American Cancer Society. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union Against Cancer (AJCC/UICC) eighth edition staging; esophageal cancer; esophagogastric cancer; staging

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28556024     DOI: 10.3322/caac.21399

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin        ISSN: 0007-9235            Impact factor:   508.702


  88 in total

1.  Radiomics nomogram outperforms size criteria in discriminating lymph node metastasis in resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Xianzheng Tan; Zelan Ma; Lifen Yan; Weitao Ye; Zaiyi Liu; Changhong Liang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Comparing the 7th and 8th editions of the American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union for International Cancer Control TNM staging system for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma treated by definitive radiotherapy.

Authors:  Masahiro Inada; Yasumasa Nishimura; Kazuki Ishikawa; Kiyoshi Nakamatsu; Yutaro Wada; Takuya Uehara; Kohei Fukuda; Shimpei Anami; Hiroshi Doi; Shuichi Kanamori
Journal:  Esophagus       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 4.230

3.  The significance of pathological extracapsular vs. intracapsular lymph node involvement in patients with resectable esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy.

Authors:  Puja Gaur Khaitan; Thomas J Watson
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Extracapsular lymph node involvement in patients with esophageal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy followed by surgery: the closer you look, the less you see.

Authors:  Yin-Kai Chao
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  Variables of importance in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients database predictive of heart transplant waitlist mortality.

Authors:  Eileen M Hsich; Lucy Thuita; Dennis M McNamara; Joseph G Rogers; Maryam Valapour; Lee R Goldberg; Clyde W Yancy; Eugene H Blackstone; Hemant Ishwaran
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 8.086

6.  Thoracic endovascular aortic repair for esophageal cancer invading the thoracic aorta: a questionnaire survey study.

Authors:  Masayuki Watanabe; Masanobu Nakajima; Katsunori Nishikawa; Hiroyuki Kato; Hisahiro Matsubara
Journal:  Esophagus       Date:  2019-10-05       Impact factor: 4.230

Review 7.  AFAP1-AS1: A novel oncogenic long non-coding RNA in human cancers.

Authors:  Fuyou Zhang; Jianfa Li; Huizhong Xiao; Yifan Zou; Yuchen Liu; Weiren Huang
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  2017-10-22       Impact factor: 6.831

8.  Identification of Prognostic Phenotypes of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma in 2 Independent Cohorts.

Authors:  Tarek Sawas; Sarah Killcoyne; Prasad G Iyer; Kenneth K Wang; Thomas C Smyrk; John B Kisiel; Yi Qin; David A Ahlquist; Anil K Rustgi; Rui J Costa; Moritz Gerstung; Rebecca C Fitzgerald; David A Katzka
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2018-08-27       Impact factor: 22.682

9.  Association of the primary tumor's SUVmax with survival after surgery for clinical stage IA esophageal cancer: a single-center retrospective study.

Authors:  Yutaka Miyawaki; Hiroshi Sato; Naoto Fujiwara; Shuichiro Oya; Hirofumi Sugita; Yasumitsu Hirano; Tomohiko Yamane; Shinichi Sakuramoto; Kojun Okamoto; Shigeki Yamaguchi; Isamu Koyama
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 3.402

10.  Value of Lymphadenectomy in Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Therapy for Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Siva Raja; Thomas W Rice; Sudish C Murthy; Usman Ahmad; Marie E Semple; Eugene H Blackstone; Hemant Ishwaran
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 12.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.