| Literature DB >> 28555103 |
Kyle C Kern1, Clinton B Wright1, Kaitlin L Bergfield2,3, Megan C Fitzhugh3, Kewei Chen4,5,6, James R Moeller7, Nooshin Nabizadeh1, Mitchell S V Elkind8, Ralph L Sacco1, Yaakov Stern7,8, Charles S DeCarli9, Gene E Alexander2,3,6,10.
Abstract
Cerebral small-vessel damage manifests as white matter hyperintensities and cerebral atrophy on brain MRI and is associated with aging, cognitive decline and dementia. We sought to examine the interrelationship of these imaging biomarkers and the influence of hypertension in older individuals. We used a multivariate spatial covariance neuroimaging technique to localize the effects of white matter lesion load on regional gray matter volume and assessed the role of blood pressure control, age and education on this relationship. Using a case-control design matching for age, gender, and educational attainment we selected 64 participants with normal blood pressure, controlled hypertension or uncontrolled hypertension from the Northern Manhattan Study cohort. We applied gray matter voxel-based morphometry with the scaled subprofile model to (1) identify regional covariance patterns of gray matter volume differences associated with white matter lesion load, (2) compare this relationship across blood pressure groups, and (3) relate it to cognitive performance. In this group of participants aged 60-86 years, we identified a pattern of reduced gray matter volume associated with white matter lesion load in bilateral temporal-parietal regions with relative preservation of volume in the basal forebrain, thalami and cingulate cortex. This pattern was expressed most in the uncontrolled hypertension group and least in the normotensives, but was also more evident in older and more educated individuals. Expression of this pattern was associated with worse performance in executive function and memory. In summary, white matter lesions from small-vessel disease are associated with a regional pattern of gray matter atrophy that is mitigated by blood pressure control, exacerbated by aging, and associated with cognitive performance.Entities:
Keywords: aging; brain atrophy; cerebrovascular disease; cognition; hypertension; scaled subprofile model; voxel-based morphometry; white matter hyperintensities
Year: 2017 PMID: 28555103 PMCID: PMC5430031 DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2017.00132
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Aging Neurosci ISSN: 1663-4365 Impact factor: 5.750
Clinical Characteristics.
| N | 64 | 21 | 22 | 21 | |
| Age in years mean ± SD | 72 ± 7 | 72 ± 7 | 71 ± 8 | 71 ± 7 | 0.80 |
| Males:Female | 21:43 | 7:14 | 7:15 | 7:14 | 0.99 |
| never:former:current smoker | 31:26:7 | 10:10:1 | 9:9:4 | 12:7:2 | 0.57 |
| # with Diabetes | 14 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 0.53 |
| # with PVD | 10 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 0.24 |
| # with <8th grade Education | 35 | 12 | 12 | 11 | 0.95 |
| IQ Z-score mean ± SD | 0.08 ± 0.81 | 0.13 ± 0.97 | 0.06 ± 0.80 | 0.06 ± 0.68 | 0.95 |
| Memory Z-score mean ± SD | 0.07 ± 0.79 | 0.03 ± 0.88 | 0.15 ± 0.75 | 0.03 ± 0.73 | 0.85 |
| Executive Function Z-score mean ± SD | –0.14 ± 0.81 | –0.12 ± 0.84 | –0.07 ± 0.80 | –0.24 ± 0.81 | 0.80 |
| Processing Speed Z-score mean ± SD | 0.01 ± 0.35 | –0.03 ± 0.30 | 0.07 ± 0.40 | –0.02 ± 0.34 | 0.54 |
| Language Z-score mean ± SD | 0.01 ± 0.75 | 0.15 ± 0.89 | –0.01 ± 0.69 | –0.11 ± 0.67 | 0.54 |
| Total Cerebral Volume cc ± SD | 1138 ± 118 | 1137 ± 99 | 1130 ± 118 | 1146 ± 139 | 0.91 |
| Gray Matter Fraction ± SD | 0.56 ± 0.02 | 0.57 ± 0.02 | 0.56 ± 0.02 | 0.56 ± 0.02 | 0.75 |
| WMH Volume cc mean ± SD | 7.7 ± 9.1 | 5.6 ± 7.7 | 9.0 ± 8.3 | 8.4 ± 11.1 | 0.45 |
| WMH Brain Fraction mean ± SD % | 0.66 ± 0.73 % | 0.48 ± 0.61% | 0.78 ± 0.70% | 0.70 ± 0.85% | 0.38 |
WMH, white matter hyperintensities; SD, standard deviation; PVD, peripheral vascular disease.
P-values reflect Chi-squared test for gender, smoking, diabetes, PVD, and education, One-way ANOVA for all others.
Total WMH Volume/Total Intracranial Volume.
Figure 1Subject scores calculated from the Scaled Subprofile Model (SSM) gray matter volume covariance pattern predict log of white matter hyperintensity (WMH) volume across the cohort.
Figure 2Gray Matter Volume (GMV) Covariance Pattern predicting log of white matter hyperintensity (WMH) volume across the entire cohort. Color bars depict Z-scores. Blue shows areas of reduced GMV Z ≤ −2 associated with greater WMH while red shows relative volume preservation with Z ≥ 2.
Figure 3(A) Expression of the white matter hyperintensity-associated gray matter volume (WMH~GMV) pattern differs across blood pressure control groups while covarying for age and educational attainment. Boxplot depicts entire range (error bars), 1st quartile, median, and 3rd quartile. (B) Main effect of age on blood pressure group x WMH~GMV pattern expression. (C) Main effect of education on blood pressure group x WMH~GMV pattern expression interaction. Error bars show 95% confidence intervals (B,C).
Figure 4Subject scores for the white matter hyperintensity-associated gray matter volume pattern predicts (A) memory function Z-score (B = −0.277, p = 0.012) and (B) executive function Z-score (B = −0.315, p = 0.004) after adjusting for age and educational attainment.