| Literature DB >> 28555001 |
Daisuke Nojima1, Yuki Ishizuka2, Masaki Muto3, Asuka Ujiro4, Fumito Kodama5, Tomoko Yoshino6, Yoshiaki Maeda7, Tadashi Matsunaga8, Tsuyoshi Tanaka9.
Abstract
Water surface-floating microalgae have great potential for biofuel applications due to the ease of the harvesting process, which is one of the most problematic steps in conventional microalgal biofuel production. We have collected promising water surface-floating microalgae and characterized their capacity for biomass and lipid production. In this study, we performed chemical mutagenesis of two water surface-floating microalgae to elevate productivity. Floating microalgal strains AVFF007 and FFG039 (tentatively identified as Botryosphaerella sp. and Chlorococcum sp., respectively) were exposed to ethyl methane sulfonate (EMS) or 1-methyl-3-nitro-1-nitrosoguanidine (MNNG), and pale green mutants (PMs) were obtained. The most promising FFG039 PM formed robust biofilms on the surface of the culture medium, similar to those formed by wild type strains, and it exhibited 1.7-fold and 1.9-fold higher biomass and lipid productivities than those of the wild type. This study indicates that the chemical mutation strategy improves the lipid productivity of water surface-floating microalgae without inhibiting biofilm formation and floating ability.Entities:
Keywords: biofuels; chemical mutagenesis; lipid production; microalgae; water surface-floating
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28555001 PMCID: PMC5484101 DOI: 10.3390/md15060151
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mar Drugs ISSN: 1660-3397 Impact factor: 5.118
Figure 1Photographs of Chlorococcum sp. FFG039 culture at each cultivation period.
Comparison of the biomass and lipid productivities of water surface-floating microalgae. The biomass was collected after 14 days of cultivation, and the total lipids including neutral lipids and polar lipids were extracted. DCW stands for dry cell weight.
| Strain | Biomass Productivity | Lipid Content (%) | Lipid Productivity |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5.2 ± 0.6 | 24.0 ± 1.1 | 1.3 ± 0.1 | |
| 3.2 ± 1.0 | 31.1 ± 2.8 | 1.0 ± 0.3 | |
| 5.2 ± 0.4 | 34.5 ± 2.1 | 1.8 ± 0.1 | |
| 5.4 ± 0.2 | 34.7 ± 0.4 | 1.9 ± 0.1 |
Figure 2Biomass production of Chlorococcum sp. FFG039 wild type (WT) and pale green mutants (PMs) in the 48-well plate. The numbers stand for clone numbers. PMs 1–54 were generated by 1-methyl-3-nitro-1-nitrosoguanidine (MNNG) treatment, and PMs 55–56 were generated by ethyl methane sulfonate (EMS) treatment. Error bars represent standard deviations of three independent experiments.
Figure 3Slant cultures (a) and chlorophyll content (b) of Chlorococcum sp. FFG039 wild type, PM9, and PM11. Error bars represent standard deviations of three independent experiments. The content of chlorophyll a (dark gray bars) and b (light gray bars) was estimated from the light absorbance at 645 nm and 663 nm, respectively. The ratios of chlorophyll a/b (open circles) were calculated.