Steven P Kurtz1, Mance E Buttram2, Maria E Pagano3, Hilary L Surratt4. 1. Center for Applied Research on Substance Use and Health Disparities, Nova Southeastern University, 7255 NE 4th Avenue, Suite 112, Miami, FL 33138, USA. Electronic address: steven.kurtz@nova.edu. 2. Center for Applied Research on Substance Use and Health Disparities, Nova Southeastern University, 7255 NE 4th Avenue, Suite 112, Miami, FL 33138, USA. Electronic address: mance.buttram@nova.edu. 3. Department of Psychiatry, Division of Child Psychiatry, Case Western Reserve University, 10524 Euclid Avenue #1155A, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA. Electronic address: Maria.Pagano@case.edu. 4. Center for Health Services Research, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kentucky, 740 South Limestone Avenue, Lexington, KY 40536, USA. Electronic address: hilary.surratt@uky.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Efficacious interventions to reduce drug use and its consequences for club drug using populations are not apparent in the literature. We tested interviewer- (CAPI) and self-administered (ACASI) comprehensive health and social risk assessments as distinct interventions compared to waitlist control. METHODS:750 men and women ages 18-39 with multidrug use and heterosexual behavior were randomized in equal proportions to the three conditions. Instrumentation included well-tested measures of drug use, risky sex, mental distress and substance dependence. RESULTS: The sample was 56% male; mean age=25. Reported risk behaviors and health consequences did not differ by assessment modality. Adjusted HLM analyses showed a significant main effect of assigned condition on all outcomes. CAPI participants had greater reductions in drug use, risky sex, mental distress and substance dependence symptoms, and greater increases in abstinence, compared to ACASI intervention or control participants at 12months, except that the CAPI and ACASI conditions had similar efficacy for reductions in drug use. Effect sizes for CAPI versus ACASI participants were d=0.2-0.3, and between CAPI and controls d=0.2-0.4. Effect sizes for improved outcomes between ACASI compared to controls were small to non-significant. CONCLUSIONS: The study established the therapeutic benefit of interviewer interaction in reducing risky behavior among this young drug using population. The study demonstrated the efficacy and acceptability of a low threshold intervention in reducing drug use, sexual risk and related co-morbidities among a not-in-treatment young adult population that exhibits severe and complex levels of drug use, but that is also highly resistant to intervention.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Efficacious interventions to reduce drug use and its consequences for club drug using populations are not apparent in the literature. We tested interviewer- (CAPI) and self-administered (ACASI) comprehensive health and social risk assessments as distinct interventions compared to waitlist control. METHODS: 750 men and women ages 18-39 with multidrug use and heterosexual behavior were randomized in equal proportions to the three conditions. Instrumentation included well-tested measures of drug use, risky sex, mental distress and substance dependence. RESULTS: The sample was 56% male; mean age=25. Reported risk behaviors and health consequences did not differ by assessment modality. Adjusted HLM analyses showed a significant main effect of assigned condition on all outcomes. CAPI participants had greater reductions in drug use, risky sex, mental distress and substance dependence symptoms, and greater increases in abstinence, compared to ACASI intervention or control participants at 12months, except that the CAPI and ACASI conditions had similar efficacy for reductions in drug use. Effect sizes for CAPI versus ACASI participants were d=0.2-0.3, and between CAPI and controls d=0.2-0.4. Effect sizes for improved outcomes between ACASI compared to controls were small to non-significant. CONCLUSIONS: The study established the therapeutic benefit of interviewer interaction in reducing risky behavior among this young drug using population. The study demonstrated the efficacy and acceptability of a low threshold intervention in reducing drug use, sexual risk and related co-morbidities among a not-in-treatment young adult population that exhibits severe and complex levels of drug use, but that is also highly resistant to intervention.
Authors: D C Des Jarlais; D Paone; J Milliken; C F Turner; H Miller; J Gribble; Q Shi; H Hagan; S R Friedman Journal: Lancet Date: 1999-05-15 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Elizabeth E Epstein; Michelle L Drapkin; David A Yusko; Sharon M Cook; Barbara S McCrady; Noelle K Jensen Journal: J Stud Alcohol Date: 2005-05
Authors: Jill R D Whittingham; Robert A C Ruiter; Linda Bolier; Lex Lemmers; Ninette Van Hasselt; Gerjo Kok Journal: Subst Use Misuse Date: 2009 Impact factor: 2.164
Authors: Chicora F Oliver; Joseph J Palamar; Alberto Salomone; Steven J Simmons; Helene L Philogene-Khalid; Nick Stokes-McCloskey; Scott M Rawls Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2018-10-18 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Kristin Feltmann; Tobias H Elgán; Anna K Strandberg; Pia Kvillemo; Nitya Jayaram-Lindström; Meryem Grabski; Jon Waldron; Tom Freeman; Helen Valerie Curran; Johanna Gripenberg Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-04-30 Impact factor: 3.390