Nick Bansback1, Ciaran S Phibbs1, Huiying Sun1, James R O'Dell1, Mary Brophy1, Edward C Keystone1, Sarah Leatherman1, Ted R Mikuls1, Aslam H Anis1. 1. From University of British Columbia and St Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Palo Alto Veterans Affairs (VA) Health Care System, Palo Alto, and Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California; VA Nebraska-Western Iowa Health Care Center and University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska; Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts; and University of Toronto and Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Abstract
Background: The RACAT (Rheumatoid Arthritis Comparison of Active Therapies) trial found triple therapy to be noninferior to etanercept-methotrexate in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Objective: To determine the cost-effectiveness of etanercept-methotrexate versus triple therapy as a first-line strategy. Design: A within-trial analysis based on the 353 participants in the RACAT trial and a lifetime analysis that extrapolated costs and outcomes by using a decision analytic cohort model. Data Sources: The RACAT trial and sources from the literature. Target Population: Patients with active RA despite at least 12 weeks of methotrexate therapy. Time Horizon: 24 weeks and lifetime. Perspective: Societal and Medicare. Intervention: Etanercept-methotrexate first versus triple therapy first. Outcome Measures: Incremental costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). Results of Base-Case Analysis: The within-trial analysis found that etanercept-methotrexate as first-line therapy provided marginally more QALYs but accumulated substantially higher drug costs. Differences in other costs between strategies were negligible. The ICERs for first-line etanercept-methotrexate and triple therapy were $2.7 million per QALY and $0.98 million per QALY over 24 and 48 weeks, respectively. The lifetime analysis suggested that first-line etanercept-methotrexate would result in 0.15 additional lifetime QALY, but this gain would cost an incremental $77 290, leading to an ICER of $521 520 per QALY per patient. Results of Sensitivity Analysis: Considering a long-term perspective, an initial strategy of etanercept-methotrexate and biologics with similar cost and efficacy is unlikely to be cost-effective compared with using triple therapy first, even under optimistic assumptions. Limitation: Data on the long-term benefit of triple therapy are uncertain. Conclusion: Initiating biologic therapy without trying triple therapy first increases costs while providing minimal incremental benefit. Primary Funding Source: The Cooperative Studies Program, Department of Veterans Affairs Office of Research and Development, Canadian Institutes for Health Research, and an interagency agreement with the National Institutes of Health-American Recovery and Reinvestment Act.
Background: The RACAT (Rheumatoid Arthritis Comparison of Active Therapies) trial found triple therapy to be noninferior to etanercept-methotrexate in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Objective: To determine the cost-effectiveness of etanercept-methotrexate versus triple therapy as a first-line strategy. Design: A within-trial analysis based on the 353 participants in the RACAT trial and a lifetime analysis that extrapolated costs and outcomes by using a decision analytic cohort model. Data Sources: The RACAT trial and sources from the literature. Target Population: Patients with active RA despite at least 12 weeks of methotrexate therapy. Time Horizon: 24 weeks and lifetime. Perspective: Societal and Medicare. Intervention: Etanercept-methotrexate first versus triple therapy first. Outcome Measures: Incremental costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). Results of Base-Case Analysis: The within-trial analysis found that etanercept-methotrexate as first-line therapy provided marginally more QALYs but accumulated substantially higher drug costs. Differences in other costs between strategies were negligible. The ICERs for first-line etanercept-methotrexate and triple therapy were $2.7 million per QALY and $0.98 million per QALY over 24 and 48 weeks, respectively. The lifetime analysis suggested that first-line etanercept-methotrexate would result in 0.15 additional lifetime QALY, but this gain would cost an incremental $77 290, leading to an ICER of $521 520 per QALY per patient. Results of Sensitivity Analysis: Considering a long-term perspective, an initial strategy of etanercept-methotrexate and biologics with similar cost and efficacy is unlikely to be cost-effective compared with using triple therapy first, even under optimistic assumptions. Limitation: Data on the long-term benefit of triple therapy are uncertain. Conclusion: Initiating biologic therapy without trying triple therapy first increases costs while providing minimal incremental benefit. Primary Funding Source: The Cooperative Studies Program, Department of Veterans Affairs Office of Research and Development, Canadian Institutes for Health Research, and an interagency agreement with the National Institutes of Health-American Recovery and Reinvestment Act.
Authors: Liana Fraenkel; Joan M Bathon; Bryant R England; E William St Clair; Thurayya Arayssi; Kristine Carandang; Kevin D Deane; Mark Genovese; Kent Kwas Huston; Gail Kerr; Joel Kremer; Mary C Nakamura; Linda A Russell; Jasvinder A Singh; Benjamin J Smith; Jeffrey A Sparks; Shilpa Venkatachalam; Michael E Weinblatt; Mounir Al-Gibbawi; Joshua F Baker; Kamil E Barbour; Jennifer L Barton; Laura Cappelli; Fatimah Chamseddine; Michael George; Sindhu R Johnson; Lara Kahale; Basil S Karam; Assem M Khamis; Iris Navarro-Millán; Reza Mirza; Pascale Schwab; Namrata Singh; Marat Turgunbaev; Amy S Turner; Sally Yaacoub; Elie A Akl Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2021-06-08 Impact factor: 5.178
Authors: April M Jorge; Ronald B Melles; Yuqing Zhang; Na Lu; Sharan K Rai; Lucy H Young; Karen H Costenbader; Rosalind Ramsey-Goldman; S Sam Lim; John M Esdaile; Ann E Clarke; M B Urowitz; Anca Askanase; Cynthia Aranow; Michelle Petri; Hyon Choi Journal: Arthritis Res Ther Date: 2018-07-05 Impact factor: 5.156
Authors: Gyanendra Pokharel; Rob Deardon; Cheryl Barnabe; Vivian Bykerk; Susan J Bartlett; Louis Bessette; Gilles Boire; Carol A Hitchon; Edward Keystone; Janet Pope; Orit Schieir; Diane Tin; Carter Thorne; Glen S Hazlewood Journal: ACR Open Rheumatol Date: 2019-08-08