Literature DB >> 28554159

Health system responsiveness and chronic disease care - What is the role of disease management programs? An analysis based on cross-sectional survey and administrative claims data.

Julia Röttger1, Miriam Blümel2, Roland Linder3, Reinhard Busse2.   

Abstract

Health system responsiveness is an important aspect of health systems performance. The concept of responsiveness relates to the interpersonal and contextual aspects of health care. While disease management programs (DMPs) aim to improve the quality of health care (e.g. by improving the coordination of care), it has not been analyzed yet whether these programs improve the perceived health system responsiveness. Our study aims to close this gap by analyzing the differences in the perceived health system responsiveness between DMP-participants and non-participants. We used linked survey- and administrative claims data from 7037 patients with coronary heart disease in Germany. Of those, 5082 were enrolled and 1955 were not enrolled in the DMP. Responsiveness was assessed with an adapted version of the WHO responsiveness questionnaire in a postal survey in 2013. The survey covered 9 dimensions of responsiveness and included 17 items for each, GP and specialist care. Each item had five answer categories (very good - very bad). We handled missing values in the covariates by multiple imputation and applied propensity score matching (PSM) to control for differences between the two groups (DMP/non-DMP). We used Wilcoxon-signed-rank and McNemar test to analyze differences regarding the reported responsiveness. The PSM led to a matched and well balanced sample of 1921 pairs. Overall, DMP-participants rated the responsiveness of care more positive. The main difference was found for the coordination of care at the GP, with 62.0% of 1703 non-participants reporting a "good" or "very good" experience, compared to 69.1% of 1703 participants (p < 0.001). The results of our study indicate an overall high responsiveness for CHD-care, as well for DMP-participants as for non-participants. Yet, the results also clearly indicate that there is still a need to improve the coordination of care.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Administrative claims data; Ambulatory care; Chronic illness; Coronary heart disease; Disease management program; Germany; Health system responsiveness; Patient experience

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28554159     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.05.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  4 in total

1.  Patient-Perceived Health System Responsiveness of the Epilepsy Management Project in Rural China during the Period of COVID-19.

Authors:  Lulu Qin; Si Chen; Xianglin Feng; Bangan Luo; Yiwei Chen
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-25

2.  Chinese Hospitalized Cardiovascular Patients' Attitudes Towards Self-Management: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Ruolin Qiu; Kara Schick-Makaroff; Leiwen Tang; Xiyi Wang; Qi Zhang; Zhihong Ye
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 2.711

3.  Monitoring the health and healthcare provision for refugees in collective accommodation centres: Results of the population-based survey RESPOND.

Authors:  Louise Biddle; Maren Hintermeier; Amir Mohsenpour; Matthias Sand; Kayvan Bozorgmehr
Journal:  J Health Monit       Date:  2021-03-31

4.  Improving People's Self-Reported Experience with the Health Services: The Role of Non-Clinical Factors.

Authors:  Ángel Fernández-Pérez; Ángeles Sánchez
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-12-25       Impact factor: 3.390

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.