Literature DB >> 28554084

General object recognition is specific: Evidence from novel and familiar objects.

Jennifer J Richler1, Jeremy B Wilmer2, Isabel Gauthier3.   

Abstract

In tests of object recognition, individual differences typically correlate modestly but nontrivially across familiar categories (e.g. cars, faces, shoes, birds, mushrooms). In theory, these correlations could reflect either global, non-specific mechanisms, such as general intelligence (IQ), or more specific mechanisms. Here, we introduce two separate methods for effectively capturing category-general performance variation, one that uses novel objects and one that uses familiar objects. In each case, we show that category-general performance variance is unrelated to IQ, thereby implicating more specific mechanisms. The first approach examines three newly developed novel object memory tests (NOMTs). We predicted that NOMTs would exhibit more shared, category-general variance than familiar object memory tests (FOMTs) because novel objects, unlike familiar objects, lack category-specific environmental influences (e.g. exposure to car magazines or botany classes). This prediction held, and remarkably, virtually none of the substantial shared variance among NOMTs was explained by IQ. Also, while NOMTs correlated nontrivially with two FOMTs (faces, cars), these correlations were smaller than among NOMTs and no larger than between the face and car tests themselves, suggesting that the category-general variance captured by NOMTs is specific not only relative to IQ, but also, to some degree, relative to both face and car recognition. The second approach averaged performance across multiple FOMTs, which we predicted would increase category-general variance by averaging out category-specific factors. This prediction held, and as with NOMTs, virtually none of the shared variance among FOMTs was explained by IQ. Overall, these results support the existence of object recognition mechanisms that, though category-general, are specific relative to IQ and substantially separable from face and car recognition. They also add sensitive, well-normed NOMTs to the tools available to study object recognition.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Face recognition; IQ; Individual differences; Object recognition

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28554084     DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.05.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  15 in total

1.  Individual differences in object recognition.

Authors:  Jennifer J Richler; Andrew J Tomarken; Mackenzie A Sunday; Timothy J Vickery; Kaitlin F Ryan; R Jackie Floyd; David Sheinberg; Alan C-N Wong; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Domain-specific and domain-general contributions to reading musical notation.

Authors:  Ting-Yun Chang; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Global precedence effects account for individual differences in both face and object recognition performance.

Authors:  Christian Gerlach; Randi Starrfelt
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-08

4.  On Defining Irritability and its Relationship to Affective Traits and Social Interpretations.

Authors:  Christen M Deveney; Joel Stoddard; Robert Evans; Goretty Chavez; Margaret Harney; Rachel Wulff
Journal:  Pers Individ Dif       Date:  2019-03-04

5.  Two graphs walk into a bar: Readout-based measurement reveals the Bar-Tip Limit error, a common, categorical misinterpretation of mean bar graphs.

Authors:  Sarah H Kerns; Jeremy B Wilmer
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Investigating the Influence of Autism Spectrum Traits on Face Processing Mechanisms in Developmental Prosopagnosia.

Authors:  Regan Fry; Xian Li; Travis C Evans; Michael Esterman; James Tanaka; Joseph DeGutis
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2022-09-29

7.  UNSW Face Test: A screening tool for super-recognizers.

Authors:  James D Dunn; Stephanie Summersby; Alice Towler; Josh P Davis; David White
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Contrasting domain-general and domain-specific accounts in cognitive neuropsychology: An outline of a new approach with developmental prosopagnosia as a case.

Authors:  Christian Gerlach; Jason J S Barton; Andrea Albonico; Manuela Malaspina; Randi Starrfelt
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2022-02-01

9.  The Role of Extraversion, IQ and Contact in the Own-Ethnicity Face Recognition Bias.

Authors:  Peter J Hills; Leanne Lowe; Brooke Hedges; Ana Rita Teixeira
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Individual differences in perceptual abilities in medical imaging: the Vanderbilt Chest Radiograph Test.

Authors:  Mackenzie A Sunday; Edwin Donnelly; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2017-09-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.