Anil Rane1, Sydney Church2, Urvita Bhatia3, Jim Orford4, Richard Velleman5, Abhijit Nadkarni6. 1. Institute of Psychiatry and Human Behaviour, Goa, India. Electronic address: dranilrane@gmail.com. 2. School of Oriental and African Studies, UK; Addictions Research Group, Sangath, Goa, India. 3. Addictions Research Group, Sangath, Goa, India. 4. School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, UK. 5. Addictions Research Group, Sangath, Goa, India; University of Bath, Bath, UK. 6. Addictions Research Group, Sangath, Goa, India; South London & Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Abstract
AIM: To review the literature on psychosocial interventions for addiction affected family members in Low and Middle Income Countries (LMIC). METHODS: A systematic review with a detailed search strategy focussing on psychosocial interventions directed towards people affected by addiction without any gender, year or language specifications was conducted. Identified titles and abstracts were screened; where needed full papers retrieved, and then independently reviewed. Data was extracted based on the aims of the study, to describe the modalities, acceptability, feasibility and effectiveness of the interventions. RESULTS: Four papers met our selection criteria. They were published between 2003 and 2014; the total sample size was 137 participants, and two studies were from Mexico and one each from Vietnam and Malaysia. The predominantly female participants comprised of parents, spouses and siblings. The common components of all the interventions included providing information regarding addiction, teaching coping skills, and providing support. Though preliminary these small studies suggests a positive effect on affected family members (AFM). There was lowering of psychological and physical distress, along with a better understanding of addictive behaviour. The interventions led to better coping; with improvements in self-esteem and assertive behaviour. The interventions, mostly delivered in group settings, were largely acceptable. CONCLUSIONS: The limited evidence does suggest positive benefits to AFMs. The scope of research needs to be extended to other addictions, and family members other than spouse and female relatives. Indigenous and locally adapted interventions are needed to address this issue keeping in mind the limited resources of LMIC. This is a field indeed in its infancy and this under recognised and under-served group needs urgent attention of researchers and policy makers.
AIM: To review the literature on psychosocial interventions for addiction affected family members in Low and Middle Income Countries (LMIC). METHODS: A systematic review with a detailed search strategy focussing on psychosocial interventions directed towards people affected by addiction without any gender, year or language specifications was conducted. Identified titles and abstracts were screened; where needed full papers retrieved, and then independently reviewed. Data was extracted based on the aims of the study, to describe the modalities, acceptability, feasibility and effectiveness of the interventions. RESULTS: Four papers met our selection criteria. They were published between 2003 and 2014; the total sample size was 137 participants, and two studies were from Mexico and one each from Vietnam and Malaysia. The predominantly female participants comprised of parents, spouses and siblings. The common components of all the interventions included providing information regarding addiction, teaching coping skills, and providing support. Though preliminary these small studies suggests a positive effect on affected family members (AFM). There was lowering of psychological and physical distress, along with a better understanding of addictive behaviour. The interventions led to better coping; with improvements in self-esteem and assertive behaviour. The interventions, mostly delivered in group settings, were largely acceptable. CONCLUSIONS: The limited evidence does suggest positive benefits to AFMs. The scope of research needs to be extended to other addictions, and family members other than spouse and female relatives. Indigenous and locally adapted interventions are needed to address this issue keeping in mind the limited resources of LMIC. This is a field indeed in its infancy and this under recognised and under-served group needs urgent attention of researchers and policy makers.
Authors: Shirley J Semple; Heather A Pines; Eileen V Pitpitan; Alicia Harvey-Vera; Gustavo Martinez; M Gudelia Rangel; Steffanie A Strathdee; Thomas L Patterson Journal: Health Care Women Int Date: 2021-08-24
Authors: Brandon A Kohrt; Laura Asher; Anvita Bhardwaj; Mina Fazel; Mark J D Jordans; Byamah B Mutamba; Abhijit Nadkarni; Gloria A Pedersen; Daisy R Singla; Vikram Patel Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-06-16 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Ruth McGovern; Debbie Smart; Hayley Alderson; Vera Araújo-Soares; Jamie Brown; Penny Buykx; Vivienne Evans; Kate Fleming; Matt Hickman; John Macleod; Petra Meier; Eileen Kaner Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-02-12 Impact factor: 4.614