Literature DB >> 28554029

Ingestion of micro- and nanoplastics in Daphnia magna - Quantification of body burdens and assessment of feeding rates and reproduction.

Sinja Rist1, Anders Baun2, Nanna B Hartmann2.   

Abstract

Evidence is increasing that micro- and nanoplastic particles can have adverse effects on aquatic organisms. Exposure studies have so far mainly been qualitative since quantitative measurements of particle ingestion are analytically challenging. The aim of this study was therefore to use a quantitative approach for determining ingestion and egestion of micro- and nanoplastics in Daphnia magna and to analyze the influence of particle size, exposure duration and the presence of food. One week old animals were exposed to 2 μm and 100 nm fluorescent polystyrene beads (1 mg/l) for 24 h, followed by a 24 h egestion period in clean medium. During both phases body burdens of particles were determined by measuring the fluorescence intensity in dissolved tissues. Ingestion and egestion were investigated in the absence and presence of food (6.7·105 cells of Raphidocelis subcapitata per ml). Furthermore, feeding rates of daphnids in response to particle exposure were measured as well as effects on reproduction during a 21 days exposure (at 1 mg/l, 0.5 mg/l and 0.1 mg/l) to investigate potential impairments of physiology. Both particle sizes were readily ingested, but the ingested mass of particles was five times higher for the 2 μm particles than for the 100 nm particles. Complete egestion did not occur within 24 h but generally higher amounts of the 2 μm particles were egested. Animal body burdens of particles were strongly reduced in the presence of food. Daphnid feeding rates decreased by 21% in the presence of 100 nm particles, but no effect on reproduction was found despite high body burdens of particles at the end of 21 days exposure. The lower egestion and decreased feeding rates, caused by the 100 nm particles, could indicate that particles in the nanometer size range are potentially more hazardous to D. magna compared to larger particle sizes.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Freshwater; Microplastics; Polystyrene; Quantification; Uptake

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28554029     DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.05.048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Pollut        ISSN: 0269-7491            Impact factor:   8.071


  15 in total

1.  Incidence and identification of microfibers in ocean waters in Admiralty Bay, Antarctica.

Authors:  Theresinha Monteiro Absher; Silvio Luiz Ferreira; Yargos Kern; Augusto Luiz Ferreira; Susete Wambier Christo; Rômulo Augusto Ando
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-11-03       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Sources, transport, measurement and impact of nano and microplastics in urban watersheds.

Authors:  Quinn T Birch; Phillip M Potter; Patricio X Pinto; Dionysios D Dionysiou; Souhail R Al-Abed
Journal:  Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 8.044

3.  Polystyrene microplastics did not affect body growth and swimming activity in Xenopus laevis tadpoles.

Authors:  Beatrice De Felice; Renato Bacchetta; Nadia Santo; Paolo Tremolada; Marco Parolini
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-10-13       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Detection of polystyrene nanoplastics in biological samples based on the solvatochromic properties of Nile red: application in Hydra attenuata exposed to nanoplastics.

Authors:  François Gagné; Joëlle Auclair; Brian Quinn
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-10-02       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Microplastic exposure across trophic levels: effects on the host-microbiota of freshwater organisms.

Authors:  Javier Edo Varg; David Outomuro; Warren Kunce; Lukas Kuehrer; Richard Svanbäck; Frank Johansson
Journal:  Environ Microbiome       Date:  2022-07-06

6.  Internalization, reduced growth, and behavioral effects following exposure to micro and nano tire particles in two estuarine indicator species.

Authors:  S Siddiqui; J M Dickens; B E Cunningham; S J Hutton; E I Pedersen; B Harper; S Harper; S M Brander
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 8.943

7.  Feeding type and development drive the ingestion of microplastics by freshwater invertebrates.

Authors:  Christian Scherer; Nicole Brennholt; Georg Reifferscheid; Martin Wagner
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Detection of polystyrene nanoplastics in biological tissues with a fluorescent molecular rotor probe.

Authors:  François Gagné
Journal:  J Xenobiot       Date:  2019-05-17

9.  A novel method for assessing microplastic effect in suspension through mixing test and reference materials.

Authors:  Zandra Gerdes; Markus Hermann; Martin Ogonowski; Elena Gorokhova
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-23       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  Environmental fate, toxicity and risk management strategies of nanoplastics in the environment: Current status and future perspectives.

Authors:  Liuwei Wang; Wei-Min Wu; Nanthi S Bolan; Daniel C W Tsang; Yang Li; Muhan Qin; Deyi Hou
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 10.588

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.