| Literature DB >> 28553271 |
Haishen Kong1,2, Fei Yu2, Weili Zhang1, Xuefen Li2, Hongxia Wang3.
Abstract
Analysis of the genotypic characteristics and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is essential for the control and treatment of diseases caused by this important pathogen. In this study, MRSA isolates obtained from a tertiary caret hospital in China were subjected to spa typing, SCCmec typing, multiple locus sequence typing (MLST), and PCR targeting of the genes encoding Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL). The disk diffusion method was used to test the antimicrobial susceptibility of the isolates to 10 non-beta-lactam antibiotics. Among the 120 MRSA isolates studied, 18 spa types and 15 ST types were identified. The spa t311 type was the most common (a total of 60 isolates; 50%) among the study strains, and nearly all the t311 strains belonged to ST5, which is the most common ST type that was previously reported from China among the t002 isolates. ST5-II/t311 was the major prevalent clone (55, 45.8%), which was followed by ST5-II/t002 (12, 10.0%) and ST59-IV/t437 (11, 9.2%). PVL-encoding genes were found in 6.7% of the isolates. Although the ST5-II/t311 and ST5-II/t002 clones are different spa types, they shared the same resistance profile (clindamycin, erythromycin, and ciprofloxacin). Most isolates of the ST239-III/t037 clone were resistant to clindamycin, erythromycin, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, tetracycline, and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. By contrast, the MRSA isolates of the ST239-III/t030 clone were more resistant to rifampin, but they were susceptible to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. Our data emphasize the need for ongoing epidemiologic surveillance.Entities:
Keywords: clonal complexes; genotyping; methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; multidrug resistance; pvl
Year: 2017 PMID: 28553271 PMCID: PMC5427121 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00838
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Figure 1Minimal Spanning Tree (MST) analysis of MRSA strains based on MLST data. Each circle corresponds to an ST. The area of each circle corresponds to the number of isolates. The relationships between the strains are indicated by the connections between the isolates and the lengths of the branches linking them. Black lines connecting pairs of STs indicate that they differ in one allele (thick lines), two alleles (thin lines), or three to seven alleles (dashed lines, refer to ST22-ST5, ST944-ST5, ST59-ST5, ST7-ST5, ST1611-ST5, ST1-ST764, ST398-ST59 and ST7-ST239). Gray zones surround STs belonging to the same clonal complex (the clonal complexes were defined from this collection, and CC5 was predominant). Four MST graphs were separately generated based on the following associations: (A) ST vs. patients; (B) ST vs. spa; (C) ST vs. pvl; and (D) ST vs. multidrug resistance.
Epidemiology of 120 MRSA isolates over 5 years including the distributions of SCC.
| ST5-II/t311 | 8 (40.0%) | 8 (32.0%) | 9 (33.3%) | 16 (57.1%) | 14 (70.0%) | 55 (45.8%) |
| ST5-II/t002 | 3 (15.0%) | 6 (24.0%) | 1 (3.7%) | 2 (7.1%) | 12 (10.0%) | |
| ST59-IV/t437 | 1 (5.0%) | 3 (12.0%) | 3 (11.1%) | 3 (10.7%) | 1 (5.0%) | 11 (9.2%) |
| ST239-III/t030 | 5 (25.0%) | 3 (12.0%) | 1 (3.7%) | 1 (5.0%) | 10 (8.3%) | |
| ST239-III/t037 | 3 (15.0%) | 1 (4.0%) | 2 (7.4%) | 6 (5.0%) | ||
| ST59-IV/t311 | 1 (3.7%) | 2 (7.1%) | 3 (2.5%) | |||
| ST5-II/t437 | 2 (7.1%) | 2 (1.7%) | ||||
| ST5-III/t037 | 1 (4.0%) | 1 (0.8%) | ||||
| ST5-II/t421 | 1 (4.0%) | 1 (0.8%) | ||||
| ST59-NT/t441 | 1 (3.7%) | 1 (0.8%) | ||||
| ST239-NT/t2592 | 1 (3.7%) | 1 (0.8%) | ||||
| ST239-II/t571 | 1 (5.0%) | 1 (0.8%) | ||||
| ST1-NT/t127 | 1 (3.7%) | 1 (0.8%) | ||||
| ST1-IV/t127 | 1 (4.0%) | 1 (0.8%) | ||||
| ST7-NT/t2613 | 1 (3.7%) | 1 (0.8%) | ||||
| ST7-V/t437 | 1 (3.6%) | 1 (0.8%) | ||||
| ST22-V/t2874 | 1 (5.0%) | 1 (0.8%) | ||||
| ST398-II/t034 | 1 (3.6%) | 1 (0.8%) | ||||
| ST630-NT/t529 | 1 (3.6%) | 1 (0.8%) | ||||
| ST630-V/t1784 | 1 (5.0%) | 1 (0.8%) | ||||
| ST764-IV/t796 | 1 (5.0%) | 1 (0.8%) | ||||
| ST944-V/t616 | 1 (3.7%) | 1 (0.8%) | ||||
| ST965-NT/t062 | 1 (3.7%) | 1 (0.8%) | ||||
| ST965-II/t062 | 1 (3.7%) | 1 (0.8%) | ||||
| ST1611-NT/t2592 | 1 (3.7%) | 1 (0.8%) | ||||
| ST3355-V/t437 | 1 (3.7%) | 1 (0.8%) | ||||
| ST3360-II/t311 | 1 (3.7%) | 1 (0.8%) | ||||
| ST3361-II/t311 | 1 (4.0%) | 1 (0.8%) | ||||
| PVL-positive | 1 (5%) | 2 (8%) | 4 (14.8%) | 1 (3.6%) | 8 (6.7%) | |
No. (%) of each molecular type in the year.
Antibiotic resistant rates of 120 methicillin-resistant .
| ST5-II/t311 | 94.5 | 96.7 | 98.2 | 20 | 45.5 | 3.6 | 3.6 | CLI, ERY, CIP |
| ST5-II/t002 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 33.3 | 8.3 | 0 | 0 | CLI, ERY, CIP |
| ST59-IV/t437 | 100 | 100 | 18.2 | 9.1 | 54.5 | 0 | 0 | CLI, ERY |
| ST239-III/t030 | 60 | 60 | 100 | 90 | 100 | 100 | 0 | CIP, GEN, TET, RIF |
| ST239-III/t037 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 100 | CLI, ERY, CIP, GEN, TET, SXT |
CLI, clindamycin; ERY, erythromycin; CIP, ciprofloxacin; GEN, gentamicin; TET, tetracycline; RIF, rifampin; SXT, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole; ARPs, antimicrobial resistance profiles.
Antibiotic-resistant strains included strains that tested as intermediate and resistant by the disk diffusion method. All 120 isolates were susceptible to vancomycin, teicoplanin, and linezolid.