Joshua C Reynolds1, Brian E Grunau2, Jonathan Elmer3, Jon C Rittenberger3, Kelly N Sawyer3, Michael C Kurz4, Ben Singer5, Alastair Proudfoot6, Clifton W Callaway3. 1. Department of Emergency Medicine, Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, Grand Rapids, MI, United States. Electronic address: reyno406@msu.edu. 2. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. 3. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States. 4. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Alabama School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL, United States. 5. Department of Perioperative Medicine, Barts Heart Centre, London, England, UK. 6. Department of Perioperative Medicine, Barts Heart Centre, London, England, UK; DeVos Cardiovascular Research Program, Spectrum Health, Grand Rapids, MI, United States.
Abstract
AIM: Estimate prevalence of ECPR-eligible subjects in a large, North American, multi-center cohort, describe natural history with conventional resuscitation, and predict optimal timing of transition to ECPR. METHODS: Secondary analysis of clinical trial enrolling adults with non-traumatic OHCA. Primary outcome was survival to discharge with favorable outcome (mRS 0-3). Subjects were additionally classified as survival with unfavorable outcome (mRS 4-5), ROSC without survival (mRS 6), or without ROSC. We plotted subject accrual as a function of resuscitation duration (CPR onset to return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) or termination of resuscitation), and estimated time-dependent probabilities of ROSC and mRS 0-3 at discharge. Adjusted logistic regression models tested the association between resuscitation duration and survival with mRS 0-3. RESULTS: Of 11,368 subjects, 1237 (10.9%; 95%CI 10.3-11.5%) were eligible for ECPR, Of these, 778 (63%) achieved ROSC, 466 (38%) survived to discharge, and 377 (30%) had mRS 0-3 at discharge. Half with eventual mRS 0-3 achieved ROSC within 8.8min (95%CI 8.3-9.2min) of resuscitation, and 90% within 21.0min (95%CI 19.1-23.7min). Time-dependent probabilities of ROSC and mRS 0-3 declined over elapsed resuscitation, and the likelihood of additional cases with mRS 0-3 beyond 20min was 8.4% (95%CI 5.9-11.0%). Resuscitation duration was independently associated with survival to discharge with mRS 0-3 (OR 0.95; 95%CI 0.92-0.97). CONCLUSION: Approximately 11% of subjects were eligible for ECPR. Only one-third survived to discharge with favorable outcome. Performing 9-21min of conventional resuscitation captured most ECPR-eligible subjects with eventual mRS 0-3 at hospital discharge.
AIM: Estimate prevalence of ECPR-eligible subjects in a large, North American, multi-center cohort, describe natural history with conventional resuscitation, and predict optimal timing of transition to ECPR. METHODS: Secondary analysis of clinical trial enrolling adults with non-traumatic OHCA. Primary outcome was survival to discharge with favorable outcome (mRS 0-3). Subjects were additionally classified as survival with unfavorable outcome (mRS 4-5), ROSC without survival (mRS 6), or without ROSC. We plotted subject accrual as a function of resuscitation duration (CPR onset to return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) or termination of resuscitation), and estimated time-dependent probabilities of ROSC and mRS 0-3 at discharge. Adjusted logistic regression models tested the association between resuscitation duration and survival with mRS 0-3. RESULTS: Of 11,368 subjects, 1237 (10.9%; 95%CI 10.3-11.5%) were eligible for ECPR, Of these, 778 (63%) achieved ROSC, 466 (38%) survived to discharge, and 377 (30%) had mRS 0-3 at discharge. Half with eventual mRS 0-3 achieved ROSC within 8.8min (95%CI 8.3-9.2min) of resuscitation, and 90% within 21.0min (95%CI 19.1-23.7min). Time-dependent probabilities of ROSC and mRS 0-3 declined over elapsed resuscitation, and the likelihood of additional cases with mRS 0-3 beyond 20min was 8.4% (95%CI 5.9-11.0%). Resuscitation duration was independently associated with survival to discharge with mRS 0-3 (OR 0.95; 95%CI 0.92-0.97). CONCLUSION: Approximately 11% of subjects were eligible for ECPR. Only one-third survived to discharge with favorable outcome. Performing 9-21min of conventional resuscitation captured most ECPR-eligible subjects with eventual mRS 0-3 at hospital discharge.
Authors: Vi Ean Tan; Alan T Evangelista; Dominick M Carella; Daniel Marino; Wayne S Moore; Nadji Gilliam; Arun Chopra; Jeffrey J Cies Journal: J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther Date: 2018 Jul-Aug
Authors: Brian Grunau; Noah Kime; Brian Leroux; Thomas Rea; Gerald Van Belle; James J Menegazzi; Peter J Kudenchuk; Christian Vaillancourt; Laurie J Morrison; Jonathan Elmer; Dana M Zive; Nancy M Le; Michael Austin; Neal J Richmond; Heather Herren; Jim Christenson Journal: JAMA Date: 2020-09-15 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: My-Linh Nguyen; Emma Gause; Brianna Mills; Joseph E Tonna; Heidi Alvey; Richard Saczkowski; Brian Grunau; Lance B Becker; David F Gaieski; Scott Youngquist; Kyle Gunnerson; Peter England; Jessica Hamilton; Jenelle Badulak; Samuel P Mandell; Eileen M Bulger; Nicholas J Johnson Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2020-10-12 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Jason A Bartos; Brian Grunau; Claire Carlson; Sue Duval; Adrian Ripeckyj; Rajat Kalra; Ganesh Raveendran; Ranjit John; Marc Conterato; Ralph J Frascone; Alexander Trembley; Tom P Aufderheide; Demetris Yannopoulos Journal: Circulation Date: 2020-01-03 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Adrian Ripeckyj; Marinos Kosmopoulos; Kadambari Shekar; Claire Carlson; Rajat Kalra; Jennifer Rees; Tom P Aufderheide; Jason A Bartos; Demetris Yannopoulos Journal: JACC Basic Transl Sci Date: 2020-02-05
Authors: Mark Dennis; Sean Lal; Paul Forrest; Alistair Nichol; Lionel Lamhaut; Richard J Totaro; Brian Burns; Claudio Sandroni Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2020-05-06 Impact factor: 5.501