Literature DB >> 28552604

Evidence of In Vitro Preservation of Human Nephrogenesis at the Single-Cell Level.

Naomi Pode-Shakked1, Rotem Gershon2, Gal Tam3, Dorit Omer4, Yehudit Gnatek4, Itamar Kanter3, Sarit Oriel3, Guy Katz5, Orit Harari-Steinberg4, Tomer Kalisky3, Benjamin Dekel6.   

Abstract

During nephrogenesis, stem/progenitor cells differentiate and give rise to early nephron structures that segment to proximal and distal nephron cell types. Previously, we prospectively isolated progenitors from human fetal kidney (hFK) utilizing a combination of surface markers. However, upon culture nephron progenitors differentiated and could not be robustly maintained in vitro. Here, by culturing hFK in a modified medium used for in vitro growth of mouse nephron progenitors, and by dissection of NCAM+/CD133- progenitor cells according to EpCAM expression (NCAM+/CD133-/EpCAM-, NCAM+/CD133-/EpCAMdim, NCAM+/CD133-/EpCAMbright), we show at single-cell resolution a preservation of uninduced and induced cap mesenchyme as well as a transitioning mesenchymal-epithelial state. Concomitantly, differentiating and differentiated epithelial lineages are also maintained. In vitro expansion of discrete stages of early human nephrogenesis in nephron stem cell cultures may be used for drug screening on a full repertoire of developing kidney cells and for prospective isolation of mesenchymal or epithelial renal lineages for regenerative medicine.
Copyright © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Wilms' tumor; cancer stem cells; kidney stem/progenitor cells; renal development; single cell gene expression analysis; stem cell markers; stem cells

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28552604      PMCID: PMC5511042          DOI: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2017.04.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stem Cell Reports        ISSN: 2213-6711            Impact factor:   7.765


Introduction

Nearly 26 million Americans, one in every nine, harbor kidney disease (Trivedi, 2010). Despite recent medical advances, treatment options for patients with renal failure are limited. The alternatives available to patients who succumb to terminal renal disease are either supportive treatment in the form of dialysis or whole organ replacement by kidney transplantation. Dialysis is associated with long-term morbidity, mortality, and poor quality of life. The shortage of donor organs and the long wait time on the recipient list hamper renal transplantation (Daar, 2006). The number of patients with terminal renal disease has increased, and the treatment costs for these patients now exceed the cumulative costs of treating cancer patients (Trivedi, 2010). Due to the growing number of patients with kidney disease and the limited treatment options, alternative treatments are clearly in need. Various types of stem cells may be applicable as a platform for cell therapy for renal disease (Pleniceanu et al., 2010, Harari-Steinberg et al., 2011). Nevertheless, we now know that (1) bone marrow and blood stem cells do not generate nephron cell types (Duffield et al., 2005, Krause and Cantley, 2005, Dekel et al., 2006a) and (2) no adult kidney epithelial stem cell with wide nephrogenic potential exists in the adult kidney (Rinkevich et al., 2014). Hence, isolation of tissue stem/progenitor cells from fetal kidneys is an attractive option for replenishment of nephron cells (Pleniceanu et al., 2010, Harari-Steinberg et al., 2011). The mammalian kidney is formed via reciprocally inductive interactions between two mesoderm precursor tissues, the metanephric mesenchyme (MM) and the ureteric bud (UB) (Pleniceanu et al., 2010). In response to UB signals, induced MM cells acquire an epithelial phenotype (mesenchymal to epithelial transition; MET) to generate committed nephron progenitor populations and sequentially form pre-tubular aggregates, renal vesicles, and C- and S-shaped bodies that eventually expand to give rise to mature nephrons (Pleniceanu et al., 2010). Recent lineage-tracing experiments of cell populations in transgenic mouse models have established that the transcription factor SIX2 signifies a multipotent progenitor cell subpopulation in the MM that condensates to form the cap mesenchyme (CM) around the UB, and is capable of self-renewing and differentiating toward different types of nephron epithelia (Boyle et al., 2008, Kobayashi et al., 2008, O'Brien et al., 2016). Nevertheless, only a few studies have utilized human fetal kidney (hFK) as starting material for regenerative purposes (Harari-Steinberg et al., 2013). More than a decade ago, we started utilizing hFK for tissue transplantation and in vivo organogenesis (Dekel et al., 1997, Dekel et al., 2002, Dekel et al., 2003). We then continued with derivation of specific hFK cell types suitable for in vitro manipulation/expansion and cell therapy (Dziedzic et al., 2014). Hypothesizing that the blastema in human Wilms' tumor represents a transformed hFK CM, we concomitantly profiled blastema-enriched human Wilms' tumors, which contain numerous undifferentiated renal progenitors, along with human fetal kidneys, and discovered progenitor biomarkers on the cell surface, allowing for sorting of human developmental renal precursors (Harari-Steinberg et al., 2013, Dekel et al., 2006b, Metsuyanim et al., 2009, Pode-Shakked et al., 2016). Importantly, we showed that the latter can be useful for cell replacement and functional repair of chronic kidney injury in mice (Harari-Steinberg et al., 2013). For functional studies we have used hFK NCAM1+ cells that contain the CM stage and early nephron differentiation, and hence are a heterogeneous cell subset. With the goal of minimizing heterogeneity, we have recently better pinpointed early stages of human nephrogenesis with a combination of surface markers (NCAM1+CD133−), allowing for isolation of hFK SIX2-expressing cells (Pode-Shakked et al., 2016). Nevertheless, early nephrogenesis and especially human CM SIX2+ cells were only minimally represented following sorting attempts, as placing hFK cells in either serum-containing medium (SCM) or serum-free medium (SFM) resulted in dedifferentiation or epithelial differentiation, respectively, with resultant loss of the human CM early on. Thus, the expansion of hFK prior to prospective isolation depleted, at least in part, crucial nephrogenic cell types. It is noteworthy that while the human CM needs to be maintained in vitro, the human wild-type (WT) blastema can be readily propagated in vivo as human xenografts, allowing for constant isolation of WT stem/progenitors (Shukrun et al., 2014). A recent breakthrough in culturing mouse CM and the derived SIX2+ cells (Brown et al., 2015; ýLi et al., 2016) has allowed us to modify the hFK culture and show robust maintenance of a human CM and a SIX2-expressing fraction in sorted hFK cell subpopulations. Accordingly, a combination of hFK expansion, fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis, and measurements of gene expression in single cells of sorted hFK fractions showed for the first time a preservation in culture of both the mesenchymal and epithelial cell repertoires engaged in human nephrogenesis.

Results

In Vitro Growth of hFK Cells in Monolayer Preserves Diversity of Human Embryonic Kidney Cells Only in mNPEM

We have previously managed to grow hFK in SFM as monolayer preserving CM elements for a short time period (Harari-Steinberg et al., 2013, Pode-Shakked et al., 2016). However, preservation of MET of human nephrogenesis in vitro has not been established until now (Figure 1A). Using three different media, namely SCM, SFM, and modified nephron progenitor expansion medium (mNPEM) (Brown et al., 2015), we initially cultured hFK in each medium for three passages (Figure 1B). Cells grown in SFM or SCM for this time period displayed mostly cobblestone (a characteristic feature of epithelial cells) and spindle-shaped (a characteristic feature of mesenchymal cells) morphology, respectively (Figure 1B, left). In contrast, cells grown on MG (Matrigel matrix)-coated plates in mNPEM displayed morphological heterogeneity showing cobblestone, spindle-shaped, and ovoid-like cells and were organized in unique “niches.” Each niche included a center of small ovoid-like crowded cells surrounded by larger cobblestone cells and crowned by an outer circle of spindle-shaped cells (Figure 1B). We next stained these cell cultures for SIX2 (as a marker for the nephron progenitors) and EpCAM (epithelial cell adhesion molecule) (as a marker for renal epithelial differentiation). As speculated, in hFK cultures grown in mNPEM, the small round cells that localize in the center of each niche stain for SIX2, while the cells in the periphery stain for EpCAM. In contrast, cells grown in either SFM or SCM for 7 days showed no SIX2 expression and were extensively stained for EpCAM (Figure 1B). Thus, only hFK cells cultured in mNPEM display phenotypic diversity forming distinct niches following even three passages in vitro.
Figure 1

In Vitro Growth of hFK Cells in Monolayer Preserves Diversity of Human Embryonic Kidney Cells Only in mNPEM

(A) Schematic representation of experiments performed.

(B) (Left) Representative morphology of hFK cells cultured in SCM, SFM, or mNPEM over 3 passages. In mNPEM, heterogeneous cell morphology is observed during in vitro culturing on MG-coated plates showing cobblestone, spindle-shaped, and small ovoid-like cells. In addition, cells are organized in unique niches. In contrast, hFK cells grown in SFM show mostly cobblestone morphology that is consistent with epithelial differentiation, and SCM cultures show spindle-shaped morphology that is becoming predominant as the passage number increases. Cells were photographed using a Nikon Digital Sight camera attached to a Nikon Eclipse TS100 microscope. Scale bars, 100 μm. (Right) Immunofluorescence staining for SIX2 and EpCAM in hFK cultures shows that the described heterogeneous “niches” appear only in cells grown in mNPEM (upper image), but not in SFM or SCM. The inner part of the niche contains small cells that are positive for SIX2 while the periphery of the niche is composed mainly of EpCAM+ epithelial cells. In contrast, for both SFM and SCM, no SIX2+ cells could be found and the cells are predominantly EpCAM+ (middle and lower images). Images were obtained using an Olympus DP72 camera attached to an Olympus BX51 fluorescence microscope and processed via cellSens standard software. Scale bars, 50 μm (upper panel) and 100 μm (middle and lower panels).

(C) A heatmap representing gene expression levels that were obtained from microfluidic multiplex qPCR of “bulk” RNA from freshly dissociated hFK cells and for hFK cells grown in mNPEM, SFM, or SCM for 7 days. Cells grown in mNPEM preserve diverse hFK lineages, as can be seen from high expression of the markers for CM (SIX2, PAX2, CITED1, SALL1, OSR1, and WT1) and differentiated nephron epithelia (EPCAM, CDH6, and CDH1), as well as low expression of stromal associated genes (FOXD1). In contrast, cells grown in SFM and SCM show significantly lower expression levels for CM markers (at least 5-fold downregulation for SIX2, 15-fold for OSR1, and 25-fold for CITED1).

(D) Double labeling of hFK cells grown in mNPEM for 14 days for SIX2 and EpCAM. The upper image represents the “niche” phenotype characterize by inner cells positively stained for SIX2 (green arrows) and peripheral epithelial cells positive for EpCAM (red arrows). The lower image represents a late epithelial stage of human nephrogenesis by cells that predominantly express only EpCAM. Images were obtained using an Olympus DP72 camera attached to an Olympus BX51 fluorescence microscope and processed via cellSens standard software. Scale bars, 100 μm.

(E) Bar graph representing the percentage of SIX2+ cells from hFK cells grown in mNPEM compared with fresh hFK (data were averaged over n = 3 independent experiments).

See also Figures S1 and S4.

In Vitro Growth of hFK Cells in Monolayer Preserves Diversity of Human Embryonic Kidney Cells Only in mNPEM (A) Schematic representation of experiments performed. (B) (Left) Representative morphology of hFK cells cultured in SCM, SFM, or mNPEM over 3 passages. In mNPEM, heterogeneous cell morphology is observed during in vitro culturing on MG-coated plates showing cobblestone, spindle-shaped, and small ovoid-like cells. In addition, cells are organized in unique niches. In contrast, hFK cells grown in SFM show mostly cobblestone morphology that is consistent with epithelial differentiation, and SCM cultures show spindle-shaped morphology that is becoming predominant as the passage number increases. Cells were photographed using a Nikon Digital Sight camera attached to a Nikon Eclipse TS100 microscope. Scale bars, 100 μm. (Right) Immunofluorescence staining for SIX2 and EpCAM in hFK cultures shows that the described heterogeneous “niches” appear only in cells grown in mNPEM (upper image), but not in SFM or SCM. The inner part of the niche contains small cells that are positive for SIX2 while the periphery of the niche is composed mainly of EpCAM+ epithelial cells. In contrast, for both SFM and SCM, no SIX2+ cells could be found and the cells are predominantly EpCAM+ (middle and lower images). Images were obtained using an Olympus DP72 camera attached to an Olympus BX51 fluorescence microscope and processed via cellSens standard software. Scale bars, 50 μm (upper panel) and 100 μm (middle and lower panels). (C) A heatmap representing gene expression levels that were obtained from microfluidic multiplex qPCR of “bulk” RNA from freshly dissociated hFK cells and for hFK cells grown in mNPEM, SFM, or SCM for 7 days. Cells grown in mNPEM preserve diverse hFK lineages, as can be seen from high expression of the markers for CM (SIX2, PAX2, CITED1, SALL1, OSR1, and WT1) and differentiated nephron epithelia (EPCAM, CDH6, and CDH1), as well as low expression of stromal associated genes (FOXD1). In contrast, cells grown in SFM and SCM show significantly lower expression levels for CM markers (at least 5-fold downregulation for SIX2, 15-fold for OSR1, and 25-fold for CITED1). (D) Double labeling of hFK cells grown in mNPEM for 14 days for SIX2 and EpCAM. The upper image represents the “niche” phenotype characterize by inner cells positively stained for SIX2 (green arrows) and peripheral epithelial cells positive for EpCAM (red arrows). The lower image represents a late epithelial stage of human nephrogenesis by cells that predominantly express only EpCAM. Images were obtained using an Olympus DP72 camera attached to an Olympus BX51 fluorescence microscope and processed via cellSens standard software. Scale bars, 100 μm. (E) Bar graph representing the percentage of SIX2+ cells from hFK cells grown in mNPEM compared with fresh hFK (data were averaged over n = 3 independent experiments). See also Figures S1 and S4. To examine whether mNPEM actually preserves the diverse nephron epithelial cell lineages of fresh hFK, including CM, we used microfluidic multiplex qPCR (Biomark, Fluidigm) on 48 selected genes (Table S1) to compare the gene expression of hFK cells grown in each of the aforementioned growth media and freshly dissociated hFK cells (Figure 1C). Bulk gene expression of mNPEM-cultured hFK cells revealed a dominant CM identity (NCAM+SIX2+) and reduction of stromal elements (FOXD1+) compared with other culture media and fresh tissue (see also Figure S1). It can also be seen that mNPEM best preserves markers for both mesenchymal (CITED1, OSR1, PAX2, SALL1, SNAI1, SNAI2, WT1) and epithelial (CDH1, CDH6, EPCAM) nephric lineages. Finally, at the protein expression level, immunofluorescence staining of hFK cells grown in mNPEM for 14 days for SIX2 and EpCAM showed preservation of the aforementioned niches containing small SIX2+ cells and surrounded by EpCAM+ cells (Figures 1D and S2). Accordingly, some of the cells in the margins of each niche showed double staining for both SIX2 and EpCAM, suggesting a transitional state of differentiation (Figure 1D, upper panel). Other areas in the same culture showed pure epithelial colonies marked by EpCAM alone without SIX2 expression (Figure 1D, lower panel). Finally, quantification of SIX2-expressing cells in the mNPEM cultures (at 7 and 14 days) showed preservation of SIX2 percentages in culture (11% and 13%, respectively) (Figure 1E). Thus, hFK kidney cells grown as monolayers in mNPEM maintain cellular diversity similar to that of fresh uncultured cells, including preservation of MET elements of nephrogenesis and reduction of interstitial cells.

NCAM+CD133− Cells Grown in mNPEM Contain Early Nephrogenic Lineages that Can Be Dissected According to EpCAM Expression

hFK cells were grown in mNPEM (Brown et al., 2015) for 7 days, after which they were analyzed for the presence of three surface markers: NCAM1 (NCAM), previously shown to enrich for the CM and early epithelial structures (Pode-Shakked et al., 2016); CD133 (PROM1), previously shown to enrich for differentiating and mature nephron tubular epithelia in the fetal kidney; and EpCAM, an epithelial differentiation marker (Figure 2A). FACS analysis of hFK cultured in mNPEM was compared with cells grown in SCM or SFM for 7 days (Figure 2B). Dissection of the NCAM+CD133− cell fraction, particularly in mNPEM, revealed three early renal subpopulations (NCAM+CD133−EpCAM−, NCAM+CD133−EpCAMdim, and NCAM+CD133−EpCAMbright) putatively spanning from the CM to the renal vesicle stage, respectively. hFK grown in mNPEM exclusively showed preservation of the NCAM+CD133− subpopulation, similar to freshly dissociated hFK cells (∼10%–11%, Figures 2B and 2C). On the contrary, the NCAM+CD133− subpopulation was significantly reduced in cells grown in SFM/SCM for 7 days (2%–3%, Figure 2B; see also Figure S2 and Table S2). Moreover, the NCAM+CD133−EpCAM−/dim fraction, putatively representing early nephrogenesis (SIX2+ cells), was preserved only in mNPEM, similar to fresh hFK cells (∼60%–70%). On the contrary, in SFM and SCM cultures the NCAM+CD133− cells were mostly EpCAMbright (∼70%–80%), while EpCAMdim or EpCAM− were minimally preserved (Figure 2B; see also Figure S2 and Table S2). Alongside the preservation of early nephrogenesis in mNPEM, later epithelial renal lineages were also maintained in mNPEM compared with freshly dissociated hFK. NCAM+CD133−EpCAMbright (putative early nephron differentiation in late transition from mesenchyme to epithelia), NCAM+CD133+ (corresponding to the S-/comma-shaped bodies), and NCAM−CD133+ (corresponding to differentiated nephron epithelia) subpopulations were all preserved (Figures 2C, 2D, and S2; Table S2). Table S2 summarizes the FACS data of NCAM, CD133, and EpCAM in fresh and cultured hFK from three different sources.
Figure 2

NCAM+CD133− Cells Grown in mNPEM Contain Early Nephrogenic Lineages that Can Be Dissected according to EpCAM Expression

Mid-gestation hFKs were dissociated and cultured in serum-containing medium (SCM), serum-free medium (SFM), and mNPEM. FACS analysis was performed for NCAM1, a marker that was previously shown to enrich for the CM and early epithelial structures, CD133 (PROM1), a marker that was previously shown to enrich for differentiating and mature epithelial nephron tubules in the fetal kidney, and EpCAM, an epithelial marker (Pode-Shakked et al., 2016, Shapiro et al., 2011).

(A) Schematic representation of experiments.

(B) Representative FACS analysis of fresh hFK and hFK cultured in either mNPEM, SFM, or SCM for 7 days. Cells that were grown in mNPEM preserve the NCAM1+CD133− cell fraction, similar to freshly dissociated cells (11% and 10.8%, respectively). In contrast, SCM and SFM show decreased percentages of NCAM1+CD133− cells (2.09% and 2.41%, respectively). Moreover, in both freshly dissociated hFK and cells grown in mNPEM, most cells are EpCAMdim or EpCAM− (42.6 + 19.9 = 62.5% and 4.71 + 64.8 = 69.51%, respectively), while cells grown in SCM or SFM show a much smaller percentage of EpCAMdim or EpCAM− populations (2.44 + 27.2 = 29.64% and 3.34 + 14 = 17.34%, respectively).

(C) Close examination of the different cell subpopulations in fresh hFK and mNPEM cultures shows that in addition to maintaining the NCAM+CD133− subpopulation and EpCAM distribution, the NCAM1+CD133+ and NCAM−CD133+ that represent the more epithelial differentiating and differentiated cells are also preserved in these cultures in a way that is comparable with fresh cells (note that the mNPEM cells here are from a different biological replicate than those in B, but the numbers are comparable). The gradual increase in EpCAMbright cells (to ∼98% and 97% in the NCAM−/CD133+ cell population) in both mNPEM-grown and fresh hFK cells is consistent with earlier findings and further stresses the preservation of all hFK epithelial lineages in mNPEM. See also Figure S2.

(D) Bar graph showing mean percentages of NCAM+CD133− cell subpopulations in fresh hFK and mNPEM cultures and the distribution of EpCAM subpopulations within this fraction (data were averaged over three independent experiments from three different hFK sources, n = 3).

(E) Immunohistochemical staining of hFK tissue (from a 22-week embryo) for NCAM, CD133, EpCAM, and SIX2 showing that within the NCAM+CD133− section of the MM, the EpCAMbright cells correspond to early epithelial differentiation (renal vesicles in particular), while the EpCAM− and EpCAMdim cells are restricted to the most cortical region containing the SIX2+ cells of the CM and early CM progeny. MM, metanephric mesenchyme; CM, condensed mesenchyme; RV, renal vesicle; T, tubules. Scale bars, 100 μm. See also Figure S2 and Table S2.

NCAM+CD133− Cells Grown in mNPEM Contain Early Nephrogenic Lineages that Can Be Dissected according to EpCAM Expression Mid-gestation hFKs were dissociated and cultured in serum-containing medium (SCM), serum-free medium (SFM), and mNPEM. FACS analysis was performed for NCAM1, a marker that was previously shown to enrich for the CM and early epithelial structures, CD133 (PROM1), a marker that was previously shown to enrich for differentiating and mature epithelial nephron tubules in the fetal kidney, and EpCAM, an epithelial marker (Pode-Shakked et al., 2016, Shapiro et al., 2011). (A) Schematic representation of experiments. (B) Representative FACS analysis of fresh hFK and hFK cultured in either mNPEM, SFM, or SCM for 7 days. Cells that were grown in mNPEM preserve the NCAM1+CD133− cell fraction, similar to freshly dissociated cells (11% and 10.8%, respectively). In contrast, SCM and SFM show decreased percentages of NCAM1+CD133− cells (2.09% and 2.41%, respectively). Moreover, in both freshly dissociated hFK and cells grown in mNPEM, most cells are EpCAMdim or EpCAM− (42.6 + 19.9 = 62.5% and 4.71 + 64.8 = 69.51%, respectively), while cells grown in SCM or SFM show a much smaller percentage of EpCAMdim or EpCAM− populations (2.44 + 27.2 = 29.64% and 3.34 + 14 = 17.34%, respectively). (C) Close examination of the different cell subpopulations in fresh hFK and mNPEM cultures shows that in addition to maintaining the NCAM+CD133− subpopulation and EpCAM distribution, the NCAM1+CD133+ and NCAM−CD133+ that represent the more epithelial differentiating and differentiated cells are also preserved in these cultures in a way that is comparable with fresh cells (note that the mNPEM cells here are from a different biological replicate than those in B, but the numbers are comparable). The gradual increase in EpCAMbright cells (to ∼98% and 97% in the NCAM−/CD133+ cell population) in both mNPEM-grown and fresh hFK cells is consistent with earlier findings and further stresses the preservation of all hFK epithelial lineages in mNPEM. See also Figure S2. (D) Bar graph showing mean percentages of NCAM+CD133− cell subpopulations in fresh hFK and mNPEM cultures and the distribution of EpCAM subpopulations within this fraction (data were averaged over three independent experiments from three different hFK sources, n = 3). (E) Immunohistochemical staining of hFK tissue (from a 22-week embryo) for NCAM, CD133, EpCAM, and SIX2 showing that within the NCAM+CD133− section of the MM, the EpCAMbright cells correspond to early epithelial differentiation (renal vesicles in particular), while the EpCAM− and EpCAMdim cells are restricted to the most cortical region containing the SIX2+ cells of the CM and early CM progeny. MM, metanephric mesenchyme; CM, condensed mesenchyme; RV, renal vesicle; T, tubules. Scale bars, 100 μm. See also Figure S2 and Table S2. To demonstrate the in situ distribution of EpCAM in the NCAM+CD133−hFK compartment, we immunostained hFK tissue for NCAM, CD133, SIX2, and EpCAM (Figure 2E). It can be seen that within the NCAM+CD133− (MM) section, EpCAM is absent from the CM. Early CM progeny maintains SIX2 and starts to express EpCAM in low levels (EpCAMdim). In the renal vesicles within the NCAM+CD133− section, EpCAM is upregulated (EpCAMbright) (Figure 2E, third panel from left). Thus, the most cortical segment containing SIX2+ cells seems to overlap with the NCAM+CD133−EpCAMdim/neg cell subpopulation. We could also discern later stages of renal MET, in particular, S-/comma-shaped bodies (NCAM+CD133+EpCAMbright) and differentiated tubules (NCAM−CD133+EpCAMbright). Thus, mNPEM allows preservation of early renal nephrogenesis while maintaining differentiated epithelial lineage.

Single-Cell Gene Expression Analysis of Prospectively Isolated hFK-Cultured Cells Reveals Representation of Major Stages of Human Nephrogenesis

To further characterize the mNPEM-cultured hFK cells at the single-cell level, we performed microfluidic single-cell qPCR. hFK cells cultured in mNPEM for 7 days were FACS sorted and ∼80 single cells from three fractions (NCAM+CD133−EpCAM−, NCAM+CD133−EpCAMdim, and NCAM+CD133+) were collected into 96-well plates. For each individual cell, we measured the expression of 48 gene targets known to be involved in kidney development and tumorigenesis (Little et al., 2010, Harding et al., 2011; Table S3; Figure 3A). We identified four major cell subpopulations representing distinct transcriptional states that could be related to the major cell types participating in kidney development (Figure 3B).
Figure 3

Single-Cell Gene Expression Analysis of Prospectively Isolated hFK-Cultured Cells Reveals Cell Subpopulations Representing All Stages of Human Nephrogenesis

(A) Schematic representation of the experiments performed.

(B) Gene expression heatmap and corresponding PCA plot of ∼240 single cells (rows) and 47 genes (columns) measured simultaneously from each cell. Gene expression levels (in terms of threshold cycles, Ct) were standardized and clustered such that phenotypically similar cells are grouped next to each other (red, high expression; green, low expression; gray, no expression). Cells were isolated from human fetal kidney, cultured in mNPEM for 7 days, and sorted by FACS into three fractions: NCAM+CD133−EPCAM−, NCAM+CD133−EPCAMdim, and NCAM+CD133+. The colors in the column on the right of the heatmap and in the PCA plot represent the FACS-sorted fraction of origin of each individual cell. We identified distinct cell subpopulations whose expression profiles correspond to the CM (SIX2+WT1+OSR1+CITED1+EYA1+SIX1+CDH11+), early nephric epithelia (EPCAM+CDH1+CDH6+PAX2+KRT18+KRT19+), and a MET-transition state (many of which cells express both CM and epithelial markers). An additional mesenchymal subpopulation (SERPINE1+ZEB1highCDH11+SIX2−) is hypothesized to correspond to the nephrogenic interstitium (containing the uninduced metanephric mesenchymal/stromal cells of the nephrogenic zone).

(C) Similar analysis of ∼160 single cells from the tumorigenic (NCAM+ALDH1+) and non-tumorigenic (NCAM+ALDH1−) cell fractions of a late (passage 10) blastemal Wilms' tumor-PDX reveals two cell subpopulations: a CM-like subpopulation (EYA1+OSR1+SIX2+SIX1+), found in both cell fractions, and an uninduced mesenchyme-like subpopulation (SERPINE1+SIX2−) found only in the tumorigenic fraction.

(D) All three cell fractions (NCAM+CD133−, NCAM+CD133+, and NCAM−CD133+) sorted from hFK cells cultured in SFM for 10 days have a nephric epithelial phenotype (EPCAM+KRT18+KRT19+SIX2−). In the NCAM+CD133− fraction, we did find a small number of more early mesenchymal cells (CDH11+), but no measurable SIX2+ cells were found within the ∼240 cells that we measured. In all heatmaps, genes that had zero expression in all cells are not shown (apart from SIX2).

Note that PCA analysis in (B) and (C) was performed on a union of all cell fractions from hFK-mNPEM and Wilms' tumor cells, whereas in (D) only hFK-SFM cell fractions were included, along with the hFK-mNPEM mesenchymal fraction (NCAM+CD133−EPCAM−) to allow for better visual comparison. See also Figure S3; Tables S1 and S3.

Single-Cell Gene Expression Analysis of Prospectively Isolated hFK-Cultured Cells Reveals Cell Subpopulations Representing All Stages of Human Nephrogenesis (A) Schematic representation of the experiments performed. (B) Gene expression heatmap and corresponding PCA plot of ∼240 single cells (rows) and 47 genes (columns) measured simultaneously from each cell. Gene expression levels (in terms of threshold cycles, Ct) were standardized and clustered such that phenotypically similar cells are grouped next to each other (red, high expression; green, low expression; gray, no expression). Cells were isolated from human fetal kidney, cultured in mNPEM for 7 days, and sorted by FACS into three fractions: NCAM+CD133−EPCAM−, NCAM+CD133−EPCAMdim, and NCAM+CD133+. The colors in the column on the right of the heatmap and in the PCA plot represent the FACS-sorted fraction of origin of each individual cell. We identified distinct cell subpopulations whose expression profiles correspond to the CM (SIX2+WT1+OSR1+CITED1+EYA1+SIX1+CDH11+), early nephric epithelia (EPCAM+CDH1+CDH6+PAX2+KRT18+KRT19+), and a MET-transition state (many of which cells express both CM and epithelial markers). An additional mesenchymal subpopulation (SERPINE1+ZEB1highCDH11+SIX2−) is hypothesized to correspond to the nephrogenic interstitium (containing the uninduced metanephric mesenchymal/stromal cells of the nephrogenic zone). (C) Similar analysis of ∼160 single cells from the tumorigenic (NCAM+ALDH1+) and non-tumorigenic (NCAM+ALDH1−) cell fractions of a late (passage 10) blastemal Wilms' tumor-PDX reveals two cell subpopulations: a CM-like subpopulation (EYA1+OSR1+SIX2+SIX1+), found in both cell fractions, and an uninduced mesenchyme-like subpopulation (SERPINE1+SIX2−) found only in the tumorigenic fraction. (D) All three cell fractions (NCAM+CD133−, NCAM+CD133+, and NCAM−CD133+) sorted from hFK cells cultured in SFM for 10 days have a nephric epithelial phenotype (EPCAM+KRT18+KRT19+SIX2−). In the NCAM+CD133− fraction, we did find a small number of more early mesenchymal cells (CDH11+), but no measurable SIX2+ cells were found within the ∼240 cells that we measured. In all heatmaps, genes that had zero expression in all cells are not shown (apart from SIX2). Note that PCA analysis in (B) and (C) was performed on a union of all cell fractions from hFK-mNPEM and Wilms' tumor cells, whereas in (D) only hFK-SFM cell fractions were included, along with the hFK-mNPEM mesenchymal fraction (NCAM+CD133−EPCAM−) to allow for better visual comparison. See also Figure S3; Tables S1 and S3. The NCAM+CD133−EpCAM− fraction enriched for two mesenchymal cell subpopulations: a CM population, overexpressing the genes SIX2, WT1, OSR1, CITED1, EYA1, SIX1, and CDH11, and a second mesenchymal subpopulation overexpressing the genes SERPINE1, ZEB1, and CDH11 (but not the CM markers SIX1, SIX2, EYA1, and CITED1, or the epithelial markers CDH1, KRT19, and EpCAM). To identify this population, we searched the microarray data in the GUDMAP database (http://www.gudmap.org) for a cell population in the mouse embryonic kidney having similar characteristics. We found that the nephrogenic interstitial cells in embryonic day 15 (E15.5) mouse embryos overexpress the gene SERPINE2, a paralog of SERPINE1, together with ZEB1 and CDH11 (Figure S3). In this same cell fraction the CM markers SIX1, SIX2, EYA1, and CITED1, and the epithelial markers CDH1, KRT19, and EpCAM were underexpressed. Therefore, we hypothesize that the second non-CM cell subpopulation (in the human cells) represents the nephrogenic interstitium, including the uninduced MM/stromal cells of the nephrogenic zone. The NCAM+CD133−EPCAMdim fraction was found to enrich for a MET state. Many of these cells overexpressed some CM-characteristic genes (SIX2, WT1, CDH11) but also genes characteristic of the early nephron epithelium (CDH6, KRT18, and KRT19), as well as PAX2, which is a marker for mesenchyme-derived epithelium (Cho et al., 1998). The NCAM+CD133+ fraction is enriched for cells overexpressing genes characteristic of early nephric epithelial cells: EPCAM, CDH1, CDH6, PAX2, KRT18, and KRT19. Within this population we observed cells with proximal (CDH6high/WT1high) and distal (CDH1high) tubular phenotypes. Furthermore, we also observed expression of ALDH1A1 and ALDH1A2, genes that were previously shown to be localized to more differentiated tubular elements in the human fetal kidney (Pode-Shakked et al., 2013). Wilms' tumor was previously shown to enrich for early developmental cell types resembling the fetal CM (Pode-Shakked et al., 2013). We therefore performed the same single-cell analysis on Wilms' tumor for comparison with the single-cell gene expression profiling in mNPEM-cultured hFK cells. We have previously shown using xenograft transplantation experiments that the NCAM+/ALDH1+ cell fraction from within the Wilms' tumor blastema is enriched for cancer stem cells (CSCs) (Pode-Shakked et al., 2013). Therefore, we used flow cytometry to sort two cell fractions from a late (passage 10) blastemal Wilms' tumor patient-derived xenograft (WT-PDX): NCAM+/ALDH1+ and NCAM+/ALDH1−. We found (Figure 3C) that while both cell fractions contain a significant CM-like subpopulation (overexpressing the genes EYA1, OSR1, SIX2, and SIX1), only the tumorigenic NCAM+/ALDH1+ fraction contains a cell subpopulation resembling the nephrogenic interstitium/uninduced mesenchyme (overexpressing SERPINE1 and almost not expressing SIX2). This indicates that the uninduced mesenchyme-like population is essential for tumorigenicity. Additionally, consistent with the overall blastemal characteristics of the WT-PDX, single-cell resolution disclosed only a repertoire of mesenchymal cells, and there was no measurable population of nephric epithelial cells (Figure 3C). We have previously shown that upon short-term culture (7 days) in SFM, hFK NCAM+CD133− sorted cells, albeit representing a diminutive cell fraction (∼0.5%), maintain some CM phenotype (SIX2 high) (Pode-Shakked et al., 2016, Shapiro et al., 2011). However, after culturing for 10 days in SFM we observed rapid differentiation into epithelia. Consistent with this observation, single-cell qPCR analysis for hFK cells that were grown in SFM for 10 days showed only the epithelial-like phenotype (overexpressing EPCAM, KRT18, and KRT19) and did not express measurable SIX2 at all, as well as other markers of early nephrogenesis (Figure 3D). These cells thus represent an early epithelialization stage likely equivalent to NCAM+CD133−EpCAMbright cell fraction in the mNPEM. To summarize, only fetal human cells grown in mNPEM capture the full repertoire of cell subpopulations that are found in the early developing fetal kidney.

Splice Isoform Expression Analysis at the Single-Cell Level Shows that hFK Cells Cultured in mNPEM Contain Both Epithelial and Mesenchymal Phenotypes, thus Recapitulating the MET in Human Nephrogenesis

We previously showed, using “bulk” RNA sequencing measurements of human fetal cells cultured in SFM, that during the MET in early kidney development many genes undergo splice isoform switching similar to that found in epithelial to mesenchymal transition in breast cancer (Pode-Shakked et al., 2013). One such gene is ENAH (hMena), which was found to switch between two isoforms: a mesenchymal isoform lacking exon 11a, and an epithelial isoform including it (Di Modugno et al., 2012, Shapiro et al., 2011, Pignatelli et al., 2014). We next demonstrated this at the single-cell level (Figure 4) by choosing primers specific to the ENAH (11a-) and ENAH (full-length) isoforms and measuring their levels using single-cell qPCR.
Figure 4

Splice Isoform Expression Analysis at the Single-Cell Level Shows Epithelial and Mesenchymal Phenotypes in Prospectively Isolated hFK-Cultured Cells and WT-PDX

Shown is the relative expression (in terms of the difference in qPCR threshold cycles, Ct) between the epithelial and mesenchymal isoforms of the gene ENAH. For clarity, only cells in which both isoforms were detected are shown. It can be seen that hFK cells cultured in mNPEM contain subpopulations with both a predominant mesenchymal isoform (NCAM+CD133−EPCAM− and NCAM+CD133−EPCAMdim) and a predominant epithelial isoform (NCAM+CD133+). Both fractions (NCAM1+ADLH1+ and NCAM1+ADLH1−) of the blastemal Wilms' tumor-PDX had strong overexpression of the mesenchymal isoform, and all three fractions (NCAM+CD133−, NCAM+CD133+, and NCAM−CD133+) of hFK cells cultured in SFM overexpressed the epithelial isoform.

Splice Isoform Expression Analysis at the Single-Cell Level Shows Epithelial and Mesenchymal Phenotypes in Prospectively Isolated hFK-Cultured Cells and WT-PDX Shown is the relative expression (in terms of the difference in qPCR threshold cycles, Ct) between the epithelial and mesenchymal isoforms of the gene ENAH. For clarity, only cells in which both isoforms were detected are shown. It can be seen that hFK cells cultured in mNPEM contain subpopulations with both a predominant mesenchymal isoform (NCAM+CD133−EPCAM− and NCAM+CD133−EPCAMdim) and a predominant epithelial isoform (NCAM+CD133+). Both fractions (NCAM1+ADLH1+ and NCAM1+ADLH1−) of the blastemal Wilms' tumor-PDX had strong overexpression of the mesenchymal isoform, and all three fractions (NCAM+CD133−, NCAM+CD133+, and NCAM−CD133+) of hFK cells cultured in SFM overexpressed the epithelial isoform. We found that fetal human cells grown in mNPEM contain both subpopulations with a predominant mesenchymal isoform (NCAM+CD133−EpCAM− and NCAM+CD133−EpCAMdim) and a predominant epithelial isoform (NCAM+CD133+). Both fractions of Wilms' tumor (NCAM1+ADLH1+ and NCAM1+ADLH1−) showed a strong overexpression of the mesenchymal isoform, and all fractions of the fetal cells grown in SFM (NCAM+CD133−, NCAM+CD133+, and NCAM−CD133+) expressed the epithelial isoform. Therefore, only human fetal cells grown in mNPEM were found to capture the MET at both gene expression and splice isoform levels.

Discussion

Herein, by utilizing a nephron progenitor-preserving medium and a combination of surface markers that allow for cell sorting and single-cell analysis of sorted fractions, we map single hFK cells from expanded cultures and show for the first time the preservation of a spectrum of cell types in vitro that constitute human nephrogenesis in vivo. Once ex vivo maintenance of the various cell types participating in nephrogenesis, including stem/progenitor cells, differentiating, and differentiated renal lineages was achieved, deeper phenotyping at single-cell resolution could be carried out. Culturing hFK in mNPEM instantly showed morphological heterogeneity, including specific undifferentiated stem cell niches and differentiating epithelial cells, which could be further exploited to show an EpCAM expression gradient (EpCAM−, EpCAMdim, EpCAMbright) within the NCAM1+CD133− hFK cell fraction that was previously suggested to enrich for nephron progenitors (Metsuyanim et al., 2009, Pode-Shakked et al., 2016). This gradient, and especially the NCAM1+CD133−EpCAM− hFK cells (a presumed early fraction), were not observed when hFK cells were grown and passaged in SFM or SCM. Since we are dealing with human biological samples, antigenic expression may differ between hFKs with resultant variable percentage of NCAM+CD133− cells. Nevertheless, this variability does not affect the distribution of the different compartments according to EpCAM, which are constantly preserved. The appearance of discrete cell subpopulations when growing hFK in mNPEM afforded the opportunity to measure gene expression at single-cell resolution in sorted cell fractions and to decipher the respective stages of human renal development. Reassurance that cells of early nephrogenesis are indeed preserved in culture came for microfluidic multiplexed qPCR experiments that analyzed bulk RNA from hFK cells grown in mNPEM, SCM, and SFM, and demonstrated differential gene expression compatible with preservation of the CM in the hFK cells grown in mNPEM. This was further verified by widespread protein expression of SIX2 in hFK-mNPEM culture at P3, as well as preservation of epithelial nephric lineages. Single-cell gene expression analysis of cell subpopulations sorted from hFK expanded in mNPEM using the Biomark system (Dalerba et al., 2011) provided a more detailed picture that better characterized the cell types expanded in culture, and pinpointed for the first time the in vitro preservation of early human nephrogenesis. Accordingly, two populations of uninduced and induced mesenchyme (CM) are expanded in the NCAM1+CD133−EpCAM− hFK cell fraction. An additional type of cells expanded in mNPEM and residing within the NCAM1+CD133− fraction appear to be in transition from mesenchyme toward epithelia (NCAM1+CD133−EpCAMdim cells). While, as expected, SIX2 expression can be traced to NCAM+CD133−EPCAM− cells, there appears to be residual SIX2 expression also in the NCAM+CD133−EPCAMdim fraction, defining a unique early CM-derived cell type expressing both a stem and differentiating phenotype. This argues against a model whereby SIX2 is shut down and only after which epithelialization starts to emerge, but rather informs about the presence of an intermediate phenotype. In this regard, immunostaining showed that NCAM+CD133−EPCAMbright cells mark renal vesicles from which SIX2 is completely absent. Importantly, while mNPEM favors expansion of cell types of early nephrogenesis, we were also able to observe differentiated nephron epithelia in later stages (NCAM1+CD133+) at single-cell resolution. In contrast, we found no evidence for expansion of non-nephrogenic mature lineages such as pericytes or endothelium. To fully appreciate and to validate the cell repertoire expanded in mNPEM (see principal component analysis [PCA] plots in Figure 3), we added additional human samples in which this repertoire appears only in part; for instance, in blastema-enriched human Wilms' tumor-PDX, single-cell analysis and PCA plots disclose the early uninduced and induced mesenchymal cell types but show total absence of the epithelial component. In contrast, in hFK expanded in serum-free media to prolonged time points (10 days), single-cell analysis and PCA plots show disappearance of the mesenchymal fractions. The diversity of the mNPEM-cultured hFK cells was further demonstrated by measuring mesenchymal and epithelial associated splice isoforms of the gene ENAH at the single-cell level (Figure 4). These measurements showed that only mNPEM-cultured hFK cells contain subpopulations with either a predominant mesenchymal isoform (NCAM+CD133−EPCAM− and NCAM+CD133−EPCAMdim) or a predominant epithelial isoform (NCAM+CD133+). In comparison, both cell fractions of the Wilms' tumor xenograft overexpressed the mesenchymal isoform and all three fractions of the SFM-cultured hFK cells expressed the epithelial isoform. Recently, directed differentiation of pluripotent stem cells to an organoid that approximates a 10-week human fetal kidney has been shown (Dekel, 2016, Takasato et al., 2015, Morizane et al., 2015, Tanigawa et al., 2016). It would be interesting to dissect, at the single-cell level, the cellular repertoires expanded in the organoid and compare it with single-cell heatmaps we have generated for expanded hFK. We acknowledge that the Biomark system allowing 48 gene measurements in a cell and not the full transcriptome may be limited. Nevertheless, the discrete hFK cell types unraveled by this system may already provide a screen for any attempt to analyze the outcome of induced pluripotent stem cell to hFK differentiation. Moreover, since a full repertoire of developing human kidney cells is expanded in the mNPEM hFK cultures, we propose them as ideal for modeling gene defects that hamper nephron differentiation at varying stages of the MET axis (Vivante et al., 2013), drug screens that aim to boost expansion of human nephron progenitors, and toxicological screens that aim to determine harmful effects at the stem cell level or more differentiated cell progeny.

Experimental Procedures

Ethics Statement

This study was conducted according to the principles expressed in the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Institutional Review Boards of Sheba, Hadassah-Ein Kerem, and Asaf Harofeh Medical Centers.

Human Fetal Kidney Samples

hFK were collected from elective abortions. Fetal gestational age ranged from 15 to 22 weeks. All studies were approved by the local ethical committee and informed consent was given by the legal guardians of the patients involved according to the Declaration of Helsinki.

Establishment of Single-Cell Suspension from Human Fetal Kidney

Each tissue was processed for the formation of a single-cell suspension as previously described (Pode-Shakked et al., 2013). In brief, collected tissues were washed with cold Hank’s balanced salt solution (Invitrogen) and minced into ∼1-mm cubes using sterile surgical scalpels. The dissected tissue was then incubated for 2 hr at 37°C with Iscove's modified Dulbecco's medium (IMDM) (Invitrogen) supplemented with 0.1% collagenase IV (Invitrogen). The digested tissue was then gradually forced through a 100-μm cell strainer to achieve a single-cell suspension.

Primary hFK Cell Cultures

Primary hFK cell cultures were performed as previously described (Harari-Steinberg et al., 2013, Metsuyanim et al., 2009, Pode-Shakked et al., 2013). Single-cell suspensions of hFK were resuspended in a growth medium (SCM, SFM, or mNPEM) and plated in flasks. SCM was composed of IMDM (Biological Industries) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Invitrogen), 1% Penicillin-streptomycin (pen-strep) 100  M, 1% L-glutamine (both from Biological Industries), 100  ng/mL epidermal growth factor (EGF), 100 ng/mL basic fibroblast growth factor (FGF), and 10 ng/mL stem cell factor (all growth factors purchased from Peprotech Asia). For passaging, cells were detached using 0.05% trypsin/EDTA (Invitrogen). SFM was composed of N2 medium (Biological Industries) supplemented with 1% pen-strep 100  M, 1% L-glutamine, 0.4% B27 supplement (Gibco), 4  μg/mL heparin sodium (Intramed), 1% non-essential amino acids, 1% sodium pyruvate, 0.2% CD lipid concentrate (all from Invitrogen), 2.4 mg/mL glucose, 0.4  mg/mL transferrin, 10  mg/mL insulin, 38.66  μg/mL putrescine, 0.04% sodium selenite, 12.6  μg/mL progesterone (all from Sigma-Aldrich), 10  ng/mL FGF, and 20 ng/mL EGF. For passaging, cells were detached using a non-enzymatic cell dissociation solution (Sigma-Aldrich). Cells were incubated as described previously (Pode-Shakked et al., 2009). All assays were conducted with low-passage cultured cells. For mNPEM, cells were plated onto 96-well plates pre-coated with Matrigel (BD Biosciences) and cultured in APEL medium (Stem Cell Technologies) supplemented with 10 μM Y-27632, 1.25 μM CHIR99021 (Stemgent), 200 ng/mL FGF9 (R&D Systems), 30 ng/mL bone morphogenetic protein 7 (BMP7) (Sigma-Aldrich), 125 nMLDN-193189 (R&D Systems), and 1 mg/mL heparin (Sigma-Aldrich). Insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1), IGF2, and BMP4 were excluded from the original medium (Brown et al., 2015) due to lack of effect on the cultured cells probably since they are unsuitable for human cells. For passaging, cells were dissociated by incubation with TrypLE for 2 min at 37°C. mNPEM was changed every 2 days. The cells were observed using Nikon Eclipse TS100 and Nikon Digital Sight cameras.

Fluorescence-Activated Cell Sorting Analysis

FACS analyses were performed on cells originating from three independent samples of hFK (ranging from 15 to 22 weeks of human gestation: hFK103, hFK104, and hFK105) as previously described (Dekel et al., 2006b). Cells grown in either medium (mNPEM, SFM, SCM) were harvested using 0.05% trypsin/EDTA (Gibco) or a non-enzymatic cell dissociation solution (Sigma-Aldrich), and the number of viable cells was determined using Trypan blue staining (Invitrogen). Cells (1 × 105 in each reaction) were suspended in 50 μL of FACS buffer (0.5% BSA and 0.02% sodium azide in PBS [Sigma-Aldrich and Invitrogen, respectively]) and blocked with FcR Blocking Reagent (Miltenyi Biotec) and human serum (1:1) for 15 min at 4°C. Surface antigens were labeled by incubation with fluorochrome-conjugated mouse anti-human CD133/1-Vio-bright (fluorescein isothiocyanate equivalent) (Miltenyi Biotech, catalog #130-105-226), mouse anti-human NCAM-allophecoaritin (eBioscience, #17-0569-42), and anti-EpCAM (CD326)-phecoaritin (eBioscience, #12-9326-42) for 45 min in the dark at 4°C to prevent internalization of antibodies. 7-Amino-actinomycin-D (7AAD; eBioscience, #00-6993-50) was used to select for viable cells. All washing steps were performed in FACS buffer. Quantitative measurements were made from the crosspoint of the immunoglobulin G isotype graph with the specific antibody graph. Data were additionally analyzed and presented using FlowJo software.

FACS Sorting

Cells were harvested as described above, filtered through a 30-μm nylon mesh before final centrifugation, and resuspended in FACS buffer. A FACSAria III sorter was used to enrich for cells expressing surface markers. An 85-μm nozzle (BD Biosciences), sheath pressure of 20–25 pounds per square inch, and an acquisition rate of 1,000–3,000 events per second were used. Single viable cells were gated on the basis of 7AAD and then physically sorted into 96-well plates for single-cell gene expression analysis.

Bulk RNA Purification

Bulk total RNA was prepared from ∼1.5 × 105 cells using the Direct-zol RNA MiniPrep kit (Zymo Research) according to the manufacturer's instructions and stored in −80°C.

Microfluidic Single-Cell qPCR

Single cells were sorted by FACS into individual wells of 96-well plates. After cell lysis, mRNA levels were measured by microfluidic single-cell qPCR using the Biomark system (Fluidigm) according to the manufacturer's instructions. This resulted in 48 gene expression values (measured in threshold cycles, Ct) for each one of the cells sorted. We analyzed approximately 80 cells from each cell fraction. qPCR standard curves were created using serial dilutions of “bulk” RNA containing a mixture of HeLa total RNA (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and RNA from adult and fetal human kidneys. TaqMan gene expression primers and probes were purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific. For clustering analysis, we standardized the expression levels of each gene individually by subtracting the mean and dividing by 3-times the SD of expressing cells. Then all values were truncated into the range [−1, +1] as previously described (Dalerba et al., 2011). Clustering was performed using complete linkage and correlation distance (MATLAB). Microfluidic multiplex qPCR from “bulk” total RNA samples was done similarly; however rather than sorting single cells into 96-well plates, 1 μL of total RNA from each sample was inserted into each well. Prior to standardization and clustering analysis, qPCR threshold cycles (Ct) were normalized to the gene ACTB. Similar results were obtained by normalizing to GAPDH. See also Supplemental Experimental Procedures.

Agar Cyto Cell Block Preparation and Immunofluorescence Staining

A total of 106 cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) for 2 hr, washed in PBS, and suspended in low-melting-point agar. After becoming solid at 40°C the agar block was transferred into PFA overnight at 40°C, washed with distilled water, and embedded. Five-micrometer sections of paraffin-embedded agar blocks were mounted on super frost-plus glass and incubated at 60°C overnight. Following deparaffinization and antigen retrieval with Zytomed Systems OmniPrep Solution, slides were incubated in Cas-Block solution for 1 hr at room temperature. The primary antibodies SIX2 (11562-1-AP, Proteintech) and Ki67 (VP-K452, Vector Laboratories) were diluted in commercial antibody diluent, incubated for 1 hr at room temperature, washed with PBS-Tween (0.05%), and incubated with secondary antibodies for 1 hr at room temperature. Following PBS-Tween washes, slides were mounted with DAPI-containing mounting and covered with coverslips. Staining was evaluated with an Olympus BX51TF microscope and Scion color and monochrome digital cameras. For experimental procedures for immunofluorescence staining of hFK cells, in vivo WT xenograft formation, single-cell gene expression analysis, and statistical analyses, see Supplemental Experimental Procedure.

Author Contributions

B.D., N.P.-S., and T.K. designed the experiments. N.P.-S., R.G., I.K., G.T., T.K., S.O., G.K., Y.G., and D.O. performed the experiments. B.D., N.P.-S., I.K., G.T., S.O., T.K., and O.H.-S. analyzed the data. B.D., N.P.-S., T.K., and R.G. wrote the manuscript.
  36 in total

1.  Kidney organoids from human iPS cells contain multiple lineages and model human nephrogenesis.

Authors:  Minoru Takasato; Pei X Er; Han S Chiu; Barbara Maier; Gregory J Baillie; Charles Ferguson; Robert G Parton; Ernst J Wolvetang; Matthias S Roost; Susana M Chuva de Sousa Lopes; Melissa H Little
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Kidney stem cells in development, regeneration and cancer.

Authors:  Klaudyna Dziedzic; Oren Pleniceanu; Benjamin Dekel
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 7.727

3.  Multiple imprinted and stemness genes provide a link between normal and tumor progenitor cells of the developing human kidney.

Authors:  Benjamin Dekel; Sally Metsuyanim; Kai M Schmidt-Ott; Edi Fridman; Jasmin Jacob-Hirsch; Amos Simon; Jehonathan Pinthus; Yoram Mor; Jonathan Barasch; Ninette Amariglio; Yair Reisner; Naftali Kaminski; Gideon Rechavi
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2006-06-15       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  3D Culture Supports Long-Term Expansion of Mouse and Human Nephrogenic Progenitors.

Authors:  Zhongwei Li; Toshikazu Araoka; Jun Wu; Hsin-Kai Liao; Mo Li; Marta Lazo; Bing Zhou; Yinghui Sui; Min-Zu Wu; Isao Tamura; Yun Xia; Ergin Beyret; Taiji Matsusaka; Ira Pastan; Concepcion Rodriguez Esteban; Isabel Guillen; Pedro Guillen; Josep M Campistol; Juan Carlos Izpisua Belmonte
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 24.633

5.  Renal hypodysplasia associates with a WNT4 variant that causes aberrant canonical WNT signaling.

Authors:  Asaf Vivante; Michal Mark-Danieli; Miriam Davidovits; Orit Harari-Steinberg; Dorit Omer; Yehudit Gnatek; Roxana Cleper; Daniel Landau; Yael Kovalski; Irit Weissman; Israel Eisenstein; Michalle Soudack; Haike Reznik Wolf; Naomi Issler; Danny Lotan; Yair Anikster; Benjamin Dekel
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 10.121

6.  Human and porcine early kidney precursors as a new source for transplantation.

Authors:  Benjamin Dekel; Tatyana Burakova; Fabian D Arditti; Shlomit Reich-Zeliger; Oren Milstein; Sarit Aviel-Ronen; Gideon Rechavi; Nir Friedman; Naftali Kaminski; Justen H Passwell; Yair Reisner
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2002-12-23       Impact factor: 53.440

7.  Fate mapping using Cited1-CreERT2 mice demonstrates that the cap mesenchyme contains self-renewing progenitor cells and gives rise exclusively to nephronic epithelia.

Authors:  Scott Boyle; Andrew Misfeldt; Kelly J Chandler; Karen K Deal; E Michelle Southard-Smith; Douglas P Mortlock; H Scott Baldwin; Mark de Caestecker
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2007-10-24       Impact factor: 3.582

8.  The GUDMAP database--an online resource for genitourinary research.

Authors:  Simon D Harding; Chris Armit; Jane Armstrong; Jane Brennan; Ying Cheng; Bernard Haggarty; Derek Houghton; Sue Lloyd-MacGilp; Xingjun Pi; Yogmatee Roochun; Mehran Sharghi; Christopher Tindal; Andrew P McMahon; Brian Gottesman; Melissa H Little; Kylie Georgas; Bruce J Aronow; S Steven Potter; Eric W Brunskill; E Michelle Southard-Smith; Cathy Mendelsohn; Richard A Baldock; Jamie A Davies; Duncan Davidson
Journal:  Development       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 6.868

9.  An EMT-driven alternative splicing program occurs in human breast cancer and modulates cellular phenotype.

Authors:  Irina M Shapiro; Albert W Cheng; Nicholas C Flytzanis; Michele Balsamo; John S Condeelis; Maja H Oktay; Christopher B Burge; Frank B Gertler
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  Dissecting Stages of Human Kidney Development and Tumorigenesis with Surface Markers Affords Simple Prospective Purification of Nephron Stem Cells.

Authors:  Naomi Pode-Shakked; Oren Pleniceanu; Rotem Gershon; Rachel Shukrun; Itamar Kanter; Efrat Bucris; Ben Pode-Shakked; Gal Tam; Hadar Tam; Revital Caspi; Sara Pri-Chen; Einav Vax; Guy Katz; Dorit Omer; Orit Harari-Steinberg; Tomer Kalisky; Benjamin Dekel
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  15 in total

1.  Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Reveals mRNA Splice Isoform Switching during Kidney Development.

Authors:  Yishay Wineberg; Tali Hana Bar-Lev; Anna Futorian; Nissim Ben-Haim; Leah Armon; Debby Ickowicz; Sarit Oriel; Efrat Bucris; Yishai Yehuda; Naomi Pode-Shakked; Shlomit Gilad; Sima Benjamin; Peter Hohenstein; Benjamin Dekel; Achia Urbach; Tomer Kalisky
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 10.121

Review 2.  Renal lineage cells as a source for renal regeneration.

Authors:  Oren Pleniceanu; Dorit Omer; Orit Harari-Steinberg; Benjamin Dekel
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 3.756

Review 3.  Kidney and organoid single-cell transcriptomics: the end of the beginning.

Authors:  Parker C Wilson; Benjamin D Humphreys
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2019-01-04       Impact factor: 3.714

Review 4.  Concise Review: Kidney Generation with Human Pluripotent Stem Cells.

Authors:  Ryuji Morizane; Tomoya Miyoshi; Joseph V Bonventre
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 6.277

5.  Successful Introduction of Human Renovascular Units into the Mammalian Kidney.

Authors:  Oren Pleniceanu; Orit Harari-Steinberg; Dorit Omer; Yehudit Gnatek; Bat-El Lachmi; Osnat Cohen-Zontag; Eugenia Manevitz-Mendelson; Aviv Barzilai; Matan Yampolsky; Yaron Fuchs; Barak Rosenzweig; Alon Eisner; Zohar Dotan; Leon G Fine; Benjamin Dekel; Shoshana Greenberger
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 10.121

6.  A Toolbox to Characterize Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Kidney Cell Types and Organoids.

Authors:  Jessica M Vanslambrouck; Sean B Wilson; Ker Sin Tan; Joanne Y-C Soo; Michelle Scurr; H Siebe Spijker; Lakshi T Starks; Amber Neilson; Xiaoxia Cui; Sanjay Jain; Melissa Helen Little; Sara E Howden
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 10.121

Review 7.  Recapitulating kidney development: Progress and challenges.

Authors:  Melissa H Little; Santhosh V Kumar; Thomas Forbes
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2018-09-20       Impact factor: 7.727

8.  In Vivo Expansion of Cancer Stemness Affords Novel Cancer Stem Cell Targets: Malignant Rhabdoid Tumor as an Example.

Authors:  Hana Golan; Rachel Shukrun; Revital Caspi; Einav Vax; Naomi Pode-Shakked; Sanja Goldberg; Oren Pleniceanu; Dekel D Bar-Lev; Michal Mark-Danieli; Sara Pri-Chen; Jasmine Jacob-Hirsch; Itamar Kanter; Ariel Trink; Ginette Schiby; Ron Bilik; Tomer Kalisky; Orit Harari-Steinberg; Amos Toren; Benjamin Dekel
Journal:  Stem Cell Reports       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 7.765

9.  Geometry of Gene Expression Space of Wilms' Tumors From Human Patients.

Authors:  Ariel Trink; Itamar Kanter; Naomi Pode-Shakked; Achia Urbach; Benjamin Dekel; Tomer Kalisky
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 5.715

Review 10.  Mixing Cells for Vascularized Kidney Regeneration.

Authors:  Michael Namestnikov; Oren Pleniceanu; Benjamin Dekel
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 6.600

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.