Literature DB >> 28552401

RysannMD: A biomedical semantic annotator balancing speed and accuracy.

John Cuzzola1, Jelena Jovanović2, Ebrahim Bagheri3.   

Abstract

Recently, both researchers and practitioners have explored the possibility of semantically annotating large and continuously evolving collections of biomedical texts such as research papers, medical reports, and physician notes in order to enable their efficient and effective management and use in clinical practice or research laboratories. Such annotations can be automatically generated by biomedical semantic annotators - tools that are specifically designed for detecting and disambiguating biomedical concepts mentioned in text. The biomedical community has already presented several solid automated semantic annotators. However, the existing tools are either strong in their disambiguation capacity, i.e., the ability to identify the correct biomedical concept for a given piece of text among several candidate concepts, or they excel in their processing time, i.e., work very efficiently, but none of the semantic annotation tools reported in the literature has both of these qualities. In this paper, we present RysannMD (Ryerson Semantic Annotator for Medical Domain), a biomedical semantic annotation tool that strikes a balance between processing time and performance while disambiguating biomedical terms. In other words, RysannMD provides reasonable disambiguation performance when choosing the right sense for a biomedical term in a given context, and does that in a reasonable time. To examine how RysannMD stands with respect to the state of the art biomedical semantic annotators, we have conducted a series of experiments using standard benchmarking corpora, including both gold and silver standards, and four modern biomedical semantic annotators, namely cTAKES, MetaMap, NOBLE Coder, and Neji. The annotators were compared with respect to the quality of the produced annotations measured against gold and silver standards using precision, recall, and F1 measure and speed, i.e., processing time. In the experiments, RysannMD achieved the best median F1 measure across the benchmarking corpora, independent of the standard used (silver/gold), biomedical subdomain, and document size. In terms of the annotation speed, RysannMD scored the second best median processing time across all the experiments. The obtained results indicate that RysannMD offers the best performance among the examined semantic annotators when both quality of annotation and speed are considered simultaneously.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Automated semantic annotation; Biomedical ontologies; Entity linking; Medical terminology; Natural language processing; UMLS metathesaurus

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28552401     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2017.05.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Inform        ISSN: 1532-0464            Impact factor:   6.317


  3 in total

1.  Text mining to support abstract screening for knowledge syntheses: a semi-automated workflow.

Authors:  Ba' Pham; Jelena Jovanovic; Ebrahim Bagheri; Jesmin Antony; Huda Ashoor; Tam T Nguyen; Patricia Rios; Reid Robson; Sonia M Thomas; Jennifer Watt; Sharon E Straus; Andrea C Tricco
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2021-05-26

2.  Parallel sequence tagging for concept recognition.

Authors:  Lenz Furrer; Joseph Cornelius; Fabio Rinaldi
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  Transformation of Pathology Reports Into the Common Data Model With Oncology Module: Use Case for Colon Cancer.

Authors:  Borim Ryu; Eunsil Yoon; Seok Kim; Sejoon Lee; Hyunyoung Baek; Soyoung Yi; Hee Young Na; Ji-Won Kim; Rong-Min Baek; Hee Hwang; Sooyoung Yoo
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 5.428

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.