Literature DB >> 28551447

Intimate partner violence and pregnancy: screening and intervention.

Christian A Chisholm1, Linda Bullock2, James E Jef Ferguson3.   

Abstract

In the first part of this review, we provided currently accepted definitions of categories and subcategories of intimate partner violence and discussed the prevalence and health impacts of intimate partner violence in nonpregnant and pregnant women. Herein we review current recommendations for intimate partner violence screening and the evidence surrounding the effectiveness of intimate partner violence interventions. Screening for intimate partner violence may include exclusively identification of victims of intimate partner violence or both the identification of and intervention for victims. Until recently, many professional organizations did not recommend universal screening for intimate partner violence because of a lack of evidence of effectiveness of screening, lack of evidence demonstrating that screening is not harmful, and/or a lack of consensus regarding the most effective screening tool. The lack of evidence supporting an intervention posed an additional barrier to screening. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists has been a staunch advocate for universal intimate partner violence screening, even when other groups either did not endorse screening or recommended it only for high-risk women. Recent published data confirm that screening is more reliable than usual care in identifying victims of intimate partner violence, both during pregnancy and in nonpregnant women. Likewise, recent published data show that there are no apparent harms of screening for intimate partner violence and that the act of screening may have an empowering effect on women and improve their relationship with and trust in their health care providers. Despite these findings, the implementation rate of intimate partner violence screening remains low. Most encouraging are the recent data showing that interventions performed after screening for intimate partner violence are effective in reducing depression symptoms and episodes of violence as well as improving some outcomes of pregnancy. Although there remains a lack of consensus regarding which screening tool may be the most effective, we exhort all obstetrician-gynecologists to screen all women for intimate partner violence at regular intervals and to familiarize themselves with available community resources to assist those women who have been identified as experiencing intimate partner violence through screening.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  barriers; interventions; screening

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28551447     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.05.043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  14 in total

1.  Stability and Change in Types of Intimate Partner Violence Across Pre-pregnancy, Pregnancy, and the Postpartum Period.

Authors:  Ceylan Cizmeli; Marci Lobel; Karisa K Harland; Audrey Saftlas
Journal:  Womens Reprod Health (Phila)       Date:  2018-10-24

2.  Intimate partner violence among postpartum women at a teaching hospital in Nigeria's Federal Capital City: pattern and materno-fetal outcomes.

Authors:  Godwin O Akaba; Habiba I Abdullahi
Journal:  Ther Adv Reprod Health       Date:  2020-06-29

3.  Trauma Exposure and Intimate Partner Violence Among Young Pregnant Women in Liberia.

Authors:  Katelyn M Sileo; Trace S Kershaw; Shantesica Gilliam; Erica Taylor; Apoorva Kommajosula; Tamora A Callands
Journal:  J Interpers Violence       Date:  2019-10-18

4.  Psychosocial Factors Associated With Postpartum Contraceptive Method Use After an Unintended Birth.

Authors:  Julia R Steinberg; Eowna Young Harrison; Michel Boudreaux
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 7.623

5.  Experiences of being screened for intimate partner violence during pregnancy: a qualitative study of women in Japan.

Authors:  Yaeko Kataoka; Mikiko Imazeki
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 2.809

6.  Maternal outcomes associated to psychological and physical intimate partner violence during pregnancy: A cohort study and multivariate analysis.

Authors:  Stella Martin-de-Las-Heras; Casilda Velasco; Juan de Dios Luna-Del-Castillo; Khalid S Khan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The relationship between intimate partner violence and HIV outcomes among pregnant women living with HIV in Malawi.

Authors:  Elizabeth C Wetzel; Tapiwa Tembo; Elaine J Abrams; Alick Mazenga; Mike J Chitani; Saeed Ahmed; Xiaoying Yu; Maria H Kim
Journal:  Malawi Med J       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 0.875

8.  Measuring the readiness to screen and manage intimate partner violence: Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the PREMIS tool for perinatal care providers.

Authors:  Candy Guiguet-Auclair; Anne Debost-Legrand; Didier Lémery; Chloé Barasinski; Blandine Mulin; Françoise Vendittelli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-04       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Propensity score analysis of psychological intimate partner violence and preterm birth.

Authors:  Stella Martín-de-Las-Heras; Khalid Saeed Khan; Casilda Velasco; Africa Caño; Juan de Dios Luna; Leticia Rubio
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Intimate Partners Violence against Women during a COVID-19 Lockdown Period: Results of an Online Survey in 7 Provinces of the Democratic Republic of Congo.

Authors:  John D Ditekemena; Christophe Luhata; Hypolite M Mavoko; Joseph Nelson Siewe Fodjo; Dalau M Nkamba; Wim Van Damme; Shahul H Ebrahim; Christiana Noestlinger; Robert Colebunders
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.