Arabella Scantlebury1, Alison Booth2, Bec Hanley3. 1. York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of York, YO10 5DD, United Kingdom. Electronic address: Arabella.scantlebury@york.ac.uk. 2. York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of York, YO10 5DD, United Kingdom. Electronic address: Alison.booth@york.ac.uk. 3. TwoCan Associates, 59 Wickham Hill, Hurstpierpoint, West Sussex, BN6 9NR, United Kingdom. Electronic address: bec.hanley@gmail.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: With technology advancements making vast amounts of health information available whenever and wherever it is required, there is a growing need to understand how this information is being accessed and used. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to explore patients/public and health professionals' experiences, practices and preferences for accessing health information. METHODS: Focus groups were conducted with 35 healthcare professionals (31 nurses and 4 allied health professionals) and 14 patients/members of the public. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 5 consultants, who were unable to attend the focus groups. Data collection took place between March and May 2013 and all data were analysed thematically. RESULTS: Health professionals and patients/members of the public reported primarily accessing health information to inform their decision making for providing and seeking treatment respectively. For all participants the internet was the primary mechanism for accessing health information, with health professionals' access affected by open access charges; time constraints and access to computers. Variation in how patients/members of the public and health professionals appraise the quality of information also emerged, with a range of techniques for assessing quality reported. CONCLUSIONS: There was a clear preference for accessing health information online within our sample. Given that this information is central to both patient and health professionals' decision making, it is essential that these individuals are basing their decisions on high quality information. Findings from this study have implications for educationalists, health professionals, policymakers and the public.
BACKGROUND: With technology advancements making vast amounts of health information available whenever and wherever it is required, there is a growing need to understand how this information is being accessed and used. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to explore patients/public and health professionals' experiences, practices and preferences for accessing health information. METHODS: Focus groups were conducted with 35 healthcare professionals (31 nurses and 4 allied health professionals) and 14 patients/members of the public. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 5 consultants, who were unable to attend the focus groups. Data collection took place between March and May 2013 and all data were analysed thematically. RESULTS: Health professionals and patients/members of the public reported primarily accessing health information to inform their decision making for providing and seeking treatment respectively. For all participants the internet was the primary mechanism for accessing health information, with health professionals' access affected by open access charges; time constraints and access to computers. Variation in how patients/members of the public and health professionals appraise the quality of information also emerged, with a range of techniques for assessing quality reported. CONCLUSIONS: There was a clear preference for accessing health information online within our sample. Given that this information is central to both patient and health professionals' decision making, it is essential that these individuals are basing their decisions on high quality information. Findings from this study have implications for educationalists, health professionals, policymakers and the public.
Authors: Kay Nicol; Kim Lehman; Joan Carlini; Kathleen Tori; Kerryn Butler-Henderson Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-05-26 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Thomas A Arcury; Joanne C Sandberg; Kathryn P Melius; Sara A Quandt; Xiaoyan Leng; Celine Latulipe; David P Miller; D Alden Smith; Alain G Bertoni Journal: J Appl Gerontol Date: 2018-10-24
Authors: Elton H Lobo; Tara Johnson; Anne Frølich; Finn Kensing; Lene J Rasmussen; Sarah M Hosking; Amy T Page; Patricia M Livingston; Sheikh Mohammed Shariful Islam; John Grundy; Mohamed Abdelrazek Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-01-26 Impact factor: 3.240