Literature DB >> 28550959

Coexistence of EGFR, KRAS, BRAF, and PIK3CA Mutations and ALK Rearrangement in a Comprehensive Cohort of 326 Consecutive Spanish Nonsquamous NSCLC Patients.

Paloma Martín Martorell1, Marisol Huerta2, Amparo Compañ Quilis3, Rosario Abellán4, Enrique Seda5, Sebastián Blesa5, Felipe J Chaves5, Diego Dualde Beltrán6, Susana Roselló Keränen2, José Franco7, Amelia Insa2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Molecular screening is crucial for the care of nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. The coexistence of mutations could have important consequences regarding treatment. We described the mutational patterns and coexistence among patients and their outcomes after targeted treatment.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from consecutive patients with newly diagnosed nonsquamous NSCLC were prospectively collected. Next-generation sequencing analysis of mutational hotspots in the EGFR, KRAS, PIK3CA, and BRAF genes and analysis of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangement were performed.
RESULTS: A total of 326 patients with nonsquamous NSCLC were identified. Of the 326 patients, 240 (73.6%) had EGFR, 141 (43.3%) KRAS, 137 (42.0%) BRAF, 130 (39.9%) PIK3CA mutation and 148 (45.4%) ALK rearrangement determined. Of the 240 with EGFR determination, 24.1% harbored EGFR mutations. Of these, 16.3% were activating mutations (43.6%, exon 19 deletion; 46.1%, exon 21; and 10.3%, exon 18) and 7.9% were nonsensitizing EGFR mutations. Furthermore, 39.0% had KRAS mutations, 2.9% BRAF mutations, 10.0% PIK3CA mutations, and 8.8% ALK rearrangements. Of the 154 stage IV patients with ≥ 1 mutations, analysis showed 19 coexisting cases (12.3%). Of 8 patients receiving targeted treatment, 6 had no response. Both responders to targeted treatment had coexistent PIK3CA mutations.
CONCLUSION: Driver mutations can coexist in nonsquamous NSCLC. In our cohort, 12.3% of cases with stage IV disease had multiple mutations. Targeted treatment might not be as effective in patients with coexisting mutations; however, coexistence with PIK3CA might not preclude a response.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Driver mutation; Mutational co-existence; Next-generation sequencing (NGS); Non–small-cell lung cancer; Treatment response

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28550959     DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2017.04.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Lung Cancer        ISSN: 1525-7304            Impact factor:   4.785


  14 in total

1.  Concomitant Mutations in EGFR 19Del/L858R Mutation and Their Association with Response to EGFR-TKIs in NSCLC Patients.

Authors:  Hengrui Liang; Caichen Li; Yi Zhao; Shen Zhao; Jun Huang; Xiuyu Cai; Bo Cheng; Shan Xiong; Jianfu Li; Wei Wang; Changbin Zhu; Weiwei Li; Jianxing He; Wenhua Liang
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 3.989

2.  Co-mutations of epidermal growth factor receptor and BRAF in Chinese non-small cell lung cancer patients.

Authors:  Panli Peng; Guoli Lv; Jinwei Hu; Kai Wang; Junhong Lv; Gang Guo
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-08

3.  Common cancer-driver mutations and their association with abnormally methylated genes in lung adenocarcinoma from never-smokers.

Authors:  Mathewos Tessema; Michael R Rossi; Maria A Picchi; Christin M Yingling; Yong Lin; Suresh S Ramalingam; Steven A Belinsky
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 5.705

4.  Correlation of MET gene amplification and TP53 mutation with PD-L1 expression in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Maher Albitar; Sucha Sudarsanam; Wanlong Ma; Shiping Jiang; Wayne Chen; Vincent Funari; Forrest Blocker; Sally Agersborg
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-02-08

5.  Usefulness of Two Independent DNA and RNA Tissue-Based Multiplex Assays for the Routine Care of Advanced NSCLC Patients.

Authors:  Elba Marin; Cristina Teixido; Elena Carmona-Rocha; Roxana Reyes; Ainara Arcocha; Nuria Viñolas; MªCarmen Rodríguez-Mues; Carlos Cabrera; Marcelo Sánchez; Ivan Vollmer; Sergi Castillo; Silvia Muñoz; Ivana G Sullivan; Adela Rodriguez; Mireia Garcia; Silvia Alos; Pedro Jares; Antonio Martinez; Aleix Prat; Miguel Ángel Molina-Vila; Noemi Reguart
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 6.639

6.  Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK)-positive Tumors: Clinical, Radiographic and Molecular Profiles, and Uncommon Sites of Metastases in Patients With Lung Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Rohan Gupta; Idoroenyi Amanam; Syed Rahmanuddin; Isa Mambetsariev; Yingyu Wang; Charity Huang; Karen Reckamp; Lalit Vora; Ravi Salgia
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 2.339

7.  Concurrent EGFR mutation and ALK rearrangement in stage IV lung adenocarcinoma-a case report and a literature review.

Authors:  Élia Cipriano; Helena Magalhães; Catarina Tavares; João Pinto; Luís Cirnes; Fernanda Estevinho
Journal:  Porto Biomed J       Date:  2021-02-11

8.  Morphological and Molecular Characterization of KRAS G12C-Mutated Lung Adenocarcinomas.

Authors:  Radu Pirlog; Nicolas Piton; Aude Lamy; Florian Guisier; Ioana Berindan-Neagoe; Jean-Christophe Sabourin; Florent Marguet
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 6.639

9.  Distribution of KRAS, DDR2, and TP53 gene mutations in lung cancer: An analysis of Iranian patients.

Authors:  Zahra Fathi; Seyed Ali Javad Mousavi; Raheleh Roudi; Farideh Ghazi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Dual drive coexistence of ALK rearrangement and KRAS mutation advanced lung adenocarcinoma and response to crizotinib.

Authors:  You-Cai Zhu; Bing Wan; Li-Xin Wu; Xing-Liang Li; Wen-Xian Wang; Chun-Wei Xu; Wu Zhuang; Jian-Guo Wei; Kai-Qi Du
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.