INTRODUCTION: Venous thrombosis is a serious surgical complication that frequently results in loss of kidney graft. CASE PRESENTATION: We report the case of a female patient recipient of a decease kidney transplant that in the tenth postoperative presented with hematuria, graft pain and oliguria. Ultrasound examination was suggestive of venous thrombosis with abnormal doppler waveform pattern and reversal of diastolic flow. She underwent emergency surgical intervention after 2h of diagnosis. The vein thrombus was removed by perfusing the renal graft artery with 1000ml of Euro-Collins solution. The patient evolves with recovery of renal function after 1 week of the procedure DISCUSSION: Similar reports of graft rescue in the vein thrombosis are scarce and that the time of diagnosis to intervention is a determining factor. CONCLUSION: Rapid diagnosis of exactly 2h combined with the early re-operation may be successful in preserving renal graft in cases of venous thrombosis.
INTRODUCTION:Venous thrombosis is a serious surgical complication that frequently results in loss of kidney graft. CASE PRESENTATION: We report the case of a female patient recipient of a decease kidney transplant that in the tenth postoperative presented with hematuria, graft pain and oliguria. Ultrasound examination was suggestive of venous thrombosis with abnormal doppler waveform pattern and reversal of diastolic flow. She underwent emergency surgical intervention after 2h of diagnosis. The vein thrombus was removed by perfusing the renal graft artery with 1000ml of Euro-Collins solution. The patient evolves with recovery of renal function after 1 week of the procedure DISCUSSION: Similar reports of graft rescue in the vein thrombosis are scarce and that the time of diagnosis to intervention is a determining factor. CONCLUSION: Rapid diagnosis of exactly 2h combined with the early re-operation may be successful in preserving renal graft in cases of venous thrombosis.
The renal vein thrombosis is a serious event after kidney transplantation and graft salvages depend on early diagnosis and intervention. The incidence of allograft vein thrombosis is about 3.4% and generally is higher in the first 2 weeks after transplantation [1]. There are most related to surgical complications, and allograft loss is the usual outcome [2]. The surgical exploration and transplantectomy were the most common treatment, but, there are fewer reports of graft salvage by thrombectomy or re-transplantation [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7]. Then, to salvage the graft is necessary a high suspicion combined with a low time of diagnostic to intervention [2], [8]. We report the case of one patient with venous thrombosis after kidney transplantation that with early intervention resulted in graft rescue. The paper has been reported in line with the SCARE criteria [9].
Case report
We report a female patient of 37 years of age and underlying disease reflux nephropathy. The patient had zero panel reactive antibody class I and II and was submitted to kidney transplantation with deceased donor. The donor had 45 years of age and the cause of death was subarachnoid hemorrhage with final creatinine of 2.6 mg/dl (initial 0.96 mg/dl). The total cold ischemia time was 24 h and 42 min. The immunosuppression was the combination of tacrolimus with mycophenolate and prednisone. The induction therapy was done with basiliximab. The patient had normal kidney function after transplantation with the progressive fall of creatinine and good diuresis (normal control ultrasound with resistive index (RI) of 0.67). The patient in the 10 postoperative presented with severe abdominal pain, hematuria, oliguria and ultrasound showing reverse diastole in segmental arteries with absence of venous flow (Fig. 1A). The diagnostic of renal vein thrombosis was established. The patient was submitted to emergence reoperation in a time of 2 h after the onset of symptoms. The graft was found swollen and purplish with thrombus in renal vein confirming the diagnostics. The kidney graft was clamped and the artery was cannulated with Abocath 14. We performed infusion with Euro-Collins solution at 4° by renal artery resulting in output vein thrombi (Fig. 2A). Perfusion was performed until the total bleaching of the thrombus and appearance of homogeneous kidney perfusion with approximately 1000 ml of infusion solution (Fig. 2B). After we perform the suture of the renal vein and reperfused the graft with satisfactory final aspect (Fig. 2C). We performed a postoperatively ultrasound showing a reduction in RI values and the presence of venous flow (Fig. 1B). We didn’t identify causal factors related to venous thrombosis, such as renal vein kicking, hypercoagulable states or alterations in the iliac vessels. The patient recovers urine output and kidney function after 1 week. We maintained the patient with heparin anticoagulation in postoperatively until one week and after with Marevan until 3 months.
Fig. 1
The Doppler ultrasound showing increased size of the graft and reverse diastole flow in segment artery. B. Doppler ultrasound showing the presence of diastole in segmental artery and resistance index of 0.81.
Fig. 2
Pictures showing the intraoperative renal artery clamped and cannulated with Abocath 14 made perfusion with Euro-Collins (A). Thrombus output by renal vein and the complete removal of thrombi (B). The renal reperfusion after remove the venous thrombi and released the arterial clamp (C).
The Doppler ultrasound showing increased size of the graft and reverse diastole flow in segment artery. B. Doppler ultrasound showing the presence of diastole in segmental artery and resistance index of 0.81.Pictures showing the intraoperative renal artery clamped and cannulated with Abocath 14 made perfusion with Euro-Collins (A). Thrombus output by renal vein and the complete removal of thrombi (B). The renal reperfusion after remove the venous thrombi and released the arterial clamp (C).
Discussion
The renal vein thrombosis is a rare event in kidney transplantation, but has a devastating effect. In this paper, we report a case of a patient with venous thrombosis possibly attributed to technique failure whose early surgical intervention resulted in the salvage of the graft. The etiology of venous thrombosis in this report cannot be attributed to factors associated with an increased risk of thrombosis such as pathology of the iliac vessels, graft atheroma or hypercoagulable states [8]. In similar cases of venous thrombosis the graft rescue is a rare event [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7]. In the present case report, the fundamental to the success is the time of diagnosis to intervention [2], [4], [5], [6], [10]. Compared to surgery the angiographic percutaneous techniques were described with the use of thrombolytics [5], [8], but other authors argue that the surgery should be the first choice. The rationale is that surgery promotes rapid removal of the thrombus and prevents bleeding complications of thrombolytic therapy [6]. Thus the diagnosis of vascular complications should be done as early as possible. We recommend the use of ultrasound that had high sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of vein thrombosis with abnormal doppler waveform pattern and reversal of diastolic flow [11], [12]. Additional invasive radiologic studies are not necessary because they can delay a definitive diagnosis [6]. In the present case the venous thrombosis was confirmed by ultrasonograft findings combined with strong clinical suspicion and the very fast surgical intervention (2 h of diagnostics to surgery) was responsible for graft rescue. The time of diagnosis to intervention is not described in the reports, but after installing thrombosis the therapeutic window for intervention is a few hours [8], [10]. Similarly Harraz et al. [8] describe that a suitable period of time for the diagnosis to intervention which might contribute to the successful outcome was 2 h. What this report adds to the literature is the exact time of intervention from diagnosis to surgery of 2 h. In conclusion, the venous thrombosis is a rare surgical complication that frequently results in graft loss, but the rapid diagnosis and early intervention can lead to graft rescue.
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest in this study.
Funding
There is no any financial support for this study.
Ethical approval
The study was approved by the institutional review board (Ethics committee of UNESP, Universidade Estadual Paulista - ethics number 63799417.2.0000.5411).
Consent
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal on request.
Authors contribution
Paulo Roberto Kawano: Participated in the performance of the research.Hamilto Akihissa Yamamoto: Participated in the performance of the research.Rodrigo Gerra: Participated in the performance of the research.Paula Dalsoglio Garcia: Participated in the performance of the research.Mariana Moraes Contti: Participated in the performance of the research.Hong Si Nga: Analysis and interpretation of data.Henrique Mochida Takase: Analysis and interpretation of data.Ariane Moyses Bravin: Analysis and interpretation of data.Luis Gustavo Modelli de Andrade: Conception and design; Final approval of the version to be published.
Authors: Markus Aschwanden; Christoph Thalhammer; Stefan Schaub; Thomas Wolff; Jürg Steiger; Kurt A Jaeger Journal: Nephrol Dial Transplant Date: 2006-01-09 Impact factor: 5.992
Authors: E Renoult; L Cormier; M Claudon; T Cao-Huu; L Frimat; O Gaucher; J Hubert; M Kessler Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2000-05 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: Riaz A Agha; Alexander J Fowler; Alexandra Saeta; Ishani Barai; Shivanchan Rajmohan; Dennis P Orgill Journal: Int J Surg Date: 2016-09-07 Impact factor: 6.071