Literature DB >> 28550499

Systematic Review of fMRI Compatible Devices: Design and Testing Criteria.

V Hartwig1, N Carbonaro2, A Tognetti2,3, N Vanello4,5.   

Abstract

Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) is at present one of the most used methodologies for functional brain exploration, both in clinical and research settings. fMRI can noninvasively measure neural activity by using specific experimental paradigms. Often, these paradigms require the stimulation of the subject to perform sensorimotor tasks: in the past, the stimuli have been administered manually for investigating fundamental aspects of tactile perception and somatosensory processing. Nowadays, the use of mechatronic devices to stimulate the subject during fMRI studies is growing, also to assure reproducibility, control, and monitoring of task performances. For these reasons, researchers are interested in designing interfaces to be used inside the MRI environment during fMRI studies. For the design of every new device safety and compatibility constraints, imposed by the presence of high static magnetic field, switching magnetic gradients and radiofrequency electromagnetic pulses, must be satisfied. Moreover, it should be considered that functional imaging sequences are even more sensitive to perturbations of the magnetic field than MRI standard diagnostic sequences. Despite several existing devices for use in fMRI studies, an extensive review is still lacking. Our survey aims to introduce into the challenges imposed on the development of fMRI-compatible devices. The current state of the art of compatible devices in fMRI will be presented, pointing out the functionalities and peculiarities of various kinds of device. A particular emphasis will be placed on the tests for the evaluation of fMRI compatibility. This review will be useful both for designers of devices to be used in fMRI studies and for neuroscientists that are having to design fMRI experimental paradigm, and therefore require an overview of existing instruments, but also a knowledge of the benefits and criticism arising from their use.

Keywords:  Compatibility; Mechatronic devices; Safety; fMRI

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28550499     DOI: 10.1007/s10439-017-1853-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0090-6964            Impact factor:   3.934


  5 in total

1.  Novel imaging technologies for genetic diagnoses in the inborn errors of metabolism.

Authors:  Andrea L Gropman; Afrouz Anderson
Journal:  J Transl Genet Genom       Date:  2020-11-13

2.  An MRI-Compatible Foot-Sole Stimulation System Enabling Characterization of the Brain Response to Walking-Related Tactile Stimuli.

Authors:  Tingwei Zhang; Kai Zhang; Junhong Zhou; Yufeng Chai; Yunfei Long; Xiaoying Wang; Brad Manor; Jue Zhang; Jing Fang
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 4.677

3.  A Simple and Compact MR-Compatible Electromagnetic Vibrotactile Stimulator.

Authors:  Xinjian Jiang; Yueqian Wang; Xiaojin Li; Liping Wang; Yong-Di Zhou; Huimin Wang
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 4.677

4.  Improving motor function after chronic stroke by interactive gaming with a redesigned MR-compatible hand training device.

Authors:  Loukas G Astrakas; Gianluca De Novi; Mark P Ottensmeyer; Christian Pusatere; Shasha Li; Michael A Moskowitz; A Aria Tzika
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 2.447

5.  Left hemispheric α band cerebral oscillatory changes correlate with verbal memory.

Authors:  Toshihiko Araki; Yoshiyuki Watanabe; Masayuki Hirata
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.