Literature DB >> 28550448

Towards xeno-free cultures of human limbal stem cells for ocular surface reconstruction.

Zala Lužnik1, Claudia Breda2, Vanessa Barbaro2, Stefano Ferrari2, Angelo Migliorati3, Enzo Di Iorio2,3, Barbara Ferrari2, Carlo Griffoni2, Andrea Grassetto2, Hossein Mostafa Elbadawy4, Marina Bertolin5.   

Abstract

Isolated limbal epithelial stem cells (LESCs) were cultured with or without a 3T3 murine fibroblast feeder-layer (FL) in 4 different culture media on culture plates or on denuded human amniotic membrane (AM) support and fibrin gel support: (1) control medium supplemented with fetal bovine serum; (2) control medium supplemented with the synthetic serum "XerumFree™ XF205" (XF); (3) CnT-20 medium supplemented with "XerumFree™ XF205" (CnT-XF) and (4) CnT-20 medium supplemented with human AB serum (CnT-AB). The three xenogeneic media were compared to standard condition (control + FL) and parameters assessed included cell morphology, proliferative potential, number of passages, assessment of clonogenic and abortive colonies, life span, ∆Np63α expression and epithelial morphology on AM. During serial cultivation of LESCs, most of the tested xeno-free media supported similar numbers of cell passages, total colony number, cumulative cell doublings (CCD) rates and expression of ∆Np63α compared to control. The conditions cultivated with a FL showed a non-statistically significant higher number of cell passages and CCD rates before senescence when compared to the same conditions cultured without FL. Except for the control medium, only XF medium enabled the growth of cells on AM. The expression of ∆Np63α was comparable in all the cultures grown onto AM, when compared to the controls on fibrin gel. In conclusion, the xeno-free media enabled LESC culture both on plastic and on denuded human AM. Despite the analyses were carried out in a statistically low number of samples and need re-assessment in a larger cohort, our results suggest that the production of a completely xeno-free LESC graft could be beneficial for future clinical applications.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Amniotic membrane; Feeder-layer; Fibrin gel; Limbal epitehlial stem cells; Synthetic medium

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28550448     DOI: 10.1007/s10561-017-9632-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Tissue Bank        ISSN: 1389-9333            Impact factor:   1.522


  5 in total

1.  In Vitro Cultivation of Limbal Epithelial Stem Cells on Surface-Modified Crosslinked Collagen Scaffolds.

Authors:  Michel Haagdorens; Vytautas Cėpla; Eline Melsbach; Laura Koivusalo; Heli Skottman; May Griffith; Ramūnas Valiokas; Nadia Zakaria; Isabel Pintelon; Marie-José Tassignon
Journal:  Stem Cells Int       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 5.443

2.  Xenofree generation of limbal stem cells for ocular surface advanced cell therapy.

Authors:  Nuria Nieto-Nicolau; Eva M Martínez-Conesa; Alba M Velasco-García; Caterina Aloy-Reverté; Anna Vilarrodona; Ricardo P Casaroli-Marano
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 6.832

3.  Comparative study of substrate free and amniotic membrane scaffolds for cultivation of limbal epithelial sheet.

Authors:  Hyun Jung Lee; Sang Min Nam; Sae Kyung Choi; Kyoung Yul Seo; Hyun Ok Kim; So-Hyang Chung
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Expansion of Human Limbal Epithelial Stem/Progenitor Cells Using Different Human Sera: A Multivariate Statistical Analysis.

Authors:  Raquel Hernáez-Moya; Sheyla González; Arantza Urkaregi; Jose Ignacio Pijoan; Sophie X Deng; Noelia Andollo
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  Genetic Modification of Limbal Stem Cells to Decrease Allogeneic Immune Responses.

Authors:  Emilio Valdivia; Marina Bertolin; Claudia Breda; Marco Carvalho Oliveira; Anna Katharina Salz; Nicola Hofmann; Martin Börgel; Rainer Blasczyk; Stefano Ferrari; Constanca Figueiredo
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 7.561

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.