Literature DB >> 28550377

Acceptability of and Adherence to an Antiretroviral-Based Vaginal Microbicide among Pregnant Women in the United States.

Elizabeth T Montgomery1, Lisa M Noguchi2, James Y Dai3, Jason Pan3, Joseph Biggio4, Craig Hendrix5, Karen Isaacs6, D Heather Watts7,8, Jill L Schwartz9, Jeanna Piper10, Richard Beigi2,11.   

Abstract

The MTN-008 trial was the first multi-dose study conducted to evaluate the safety of a microbicide gel (2:1 randomized to tenofovir 1% or hydroxycellulose (HEC) placebo gel) during pregnancy. The study aim was to evaluate safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of the study products. Procedures included daily gel administration, with Day 0 and Day 6 in clinic, and Days 1-5 at home. Because pregnancy may pose unique challenges to consistent gel use and acceptability, evaluation of adherence and acceptability was a secondary objective of the trial. The study enrolled healthy, HIV-negative, pregnant women aged 18-40 in Pittsburgh, PA and Birmingham, AL, USA in 2 consecutive groups: cohort 1 was 37-39 weeks gestation, cohort 2 was 34-36 weeks. Ninety-one women completed the study (45 and 46 in each cohort, respectively) and were evaluable per protocol. Adherence was evaluated using self-reports: participants completed a web-based computer-assisted self-interview (CASI) at Days 0 and 6 about gel attitudes and behaviors. At Day 6 trained research staff conducted a short interviewer-administered questionnaire with both structured and open-ended questions. Frequencies of quantitative data were tabulated in SAS and descriptive statistics are presented; open-ended textual data were summarized by a behavioral scientist experienced in qualitative analysis. Participants reported generally neutral perceptions of gel characteristics. A small number of women (7-8%) reported pain (6/90), other physical discomfort (7/90), or mental discomfort (7/90) associated with the process of applicator insertion. About 5% reported the same for the gel itself. Two-thirds (61/90) thought the gel was runny, many complained of bothersome gel leakage and several cited this reason for not inserting a full dose. The majority were not worried the gel would cause problems for their pregnancy or babies. Ninety-seven percent (83/86) said they would use the gel in the future if they were pregnant, and 90% (81/90) when nonpregnant. Self-reported adherence was high with 88% (79/90) reporting daily gel use on both the computerized and interviewer-administered questionnaires. The majority (67/90) reported no difficulty with daily use. However, drug was undetectable (<0.31 ng/mL) among 45% (27/60; 95% CI 32-58%) of the women on active product prior to observed dosing at Day 6. The most common reason for reported nonuse (N = 6) was forgetting. Study gel was generally acceptable, but many complained of a runny consistency (61/90) and leakage (83/90). No frequent or strong concerns about the effects of the study gel on the pregnancy/fetus were reported. Self-reported adherence to study gel self-administered at home for 5 days was high, however plasma drug levels suggest actual use may have been considerably lower. Findings from this study can provide insights relevant to use of other antiretroviral-based, vaginally-inserted HIV prevention methods during pregnancy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breastfeeding; HIV prevention; Microbicide; Pregnant; Tenofovir

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28550377      PMCID: PMC5702586          DOI: 10.1007/s10461-017-1811-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AIDS Behav        ISSN: 1090-7165


  20 in total

1.  Acquiring human immunodeficiency virus during pregnancy and mother-to-child transmission in New York: 2002-2006.

Authors:  Guthrie S Birkhead; Wendy P Pulver; Barbara L Warren; Sheila Hackel; Deborah Rodríguez; Lou Smith
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Association of recent HIV infection and in-utero HIV-1 transmission.

Authors:  Taha E Taha; Maria M James; Donald R Hoover; Jin Sun; Oliver Laeyendecker; Caroline E Mullis; Johnstone J Kumwenda; Jairam R Lingappa; Bertran Auvert; Charles S Morrison; Lynne M Mofensen; Allan Taylor; Mary G Fowler; Newton I Kumenda; Susan H Eshleman
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2011-07-17       Impact factor: 4.177

3.  Increased risk of incident HIV during pregnancy in Rakai, Uganda: a prospective study.

Authors:  Ronald H Gray; Xianbin Li; Godfrey Kigozi; David Serwadda; Heena Brahmbhatt; Fred Wabwire-Mangen; Fred Nalugoda; Mohamed Kiddugavu; Nelson Sewankambo; Thomas C Quinn; Steven J Reynolds; Maria J Wawer
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005-10-01       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Increased risk of HIV-1 transmission in pregnancy: a prospective study among African HIV-1-serodiscordant couples.

Authors:  Nelly R Mugo; Renee Heffron; Deborah Donnell; Anna Wald; Edwin O Were; Helen Rees; Connie Celum; James N Kiarie; Craig R Cohen; Kayitesi Kayintekore; Jared M Baeten
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2011-09-24       Impact factor: 4.177

5.  Tenofovir-based preexposure prophylaxis for HIV infection among African women.

Authors:  Jeanne M Marrazzo; Gita Ramjee; Barbra A Richardson; Kailazarid Gomez; Nyaradzo Mgodi; Gonasagrie Nair; Thesla Palanee; Clemensia Nakabiito; Ariane van der Straten; Lisa Noguchi; Craig W Hendrix; James Y Dai; Shayhana Ganesh; Baningi Mkhize; Marthinette Taljaard; Urvi M Parikh; Jeanna Piper; Benoît Mâsse; Cynthia Grossman; James Rooney; Jill L Schwartz; Heather Watts; Mark A Marzinke; Sharon L Hillier; Ian M McGowan; Z Mike Chirenje
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-02-05       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  In vitro and ex vivo testing of tenofovir shows it is effective as an HIV-1 microbicide.

Authors:  Lisa C Rohan; Bernard J Moncla; Ratiya Pamela Kunjara Na Ayudhya; Marilyn Cost; Yunda Huang; Fang Gai; Nicole Billitto; J D Lynam; Kara Pryke; Phillip Graebing; Nicole Hopkins; James F Rooney; David Friend; Charlene S Dezzutti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  PRO2000 vaginal gel for prevention of HIV-1 infection (Microbicides Development Programme 301): a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group trial.

Authors:  Sheena McCormack; Gita Ramjee; Anatoli Kamali; Helen Rees; Angela M Crook; Mitzy Gafos; Ute Jentsch; Robert Pool; Maureen Chisembele; Saidi Kapiga; Richard Mutemwa; Andrew Vallely; Thesla Palanee; Yuki Sookrajh; Charles J Lacey; Janet Darbyshire; Heiner Grosskurth; Albert Profy; Andrew Nunn; Richard Hayes; Jonathan Weber
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Pregnancy and the risk of HIV-1 acquisition among women in Uganda and Zimbabwe.

Authors:  Charles S Morrison; Jing Wang; Barbara Van Der Pol; Nancy Padian; Robert A Salata; Barbra A Richardson
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2007-05-11       Impact factor: 4.177

9.  Preexposure prophylaxis for HIV infection among African women.

Authors:  Lut Van Damme; Amy Corneli; Khatija Ahmed; Kawango Agot; Johan Lombaard; Saidi Kapiga; Mookho Malahleha; Fredrick Owino; Rachel Manongi; Jacob Onyango; Lucky Temu; Modie Constance Monedi; Paul Mak'Oketch; Mankalimeng Makanda; Ilse Reblin; Shumani Elsie Makatu; Lisa Saylor; Haddie Kiernan; Stella Kirkendale; Christina Wong; Robert Grant; Angela Kashuba; Kavita Nanda; Justin Mandala; Katrien Fransen; Jennifer Deese; Tania Crucitti; Timothy D Mastro; Douglas Taylor
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  MTN-001: randomized pharmacokinetic cross-over study comparing tenofovir vaginal gel and oral tablets in vaginal tissue and other compartments.

Authors:  Craig W Hendrix; Beatrice A Chen; Vijayanand Guddera; Craig Hoesley; Jessica Justman; Clemensia Nakabiito; Robert Salata; Lydia Soto-Torres; Karen Patterson; Alexandra M Minnis; Sharavi Gandham; Kailazarid Gomez; Barbra A Richardson; Namandje N Bumpus
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  8 in total

1.  Factors Supporting and Hindering Adherence to Rectal Microbicide Gel Use with Receptive Anal Intercourse in a Phase 2 Trial.

Authors:  Rebecca Giguere; Christine Tagliaferri Rael; Alan Sheinfil; Ivan C Balán; William Brown; Titcha Ho; Curtis Dolezal; Cheng-Shiun Leu; Albert Liu; Kenneth H Mayer; Javier R Lama; Ian McGowan; Alex Carballo-Diéguez; Ross D Cranston
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2018-02

2.  Preferences for HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis Products Among Black Women in the U.S.

Authors:  Whitney C Irie; Sarah K Calabrese; Rupa R Patel; Kenneth H Mayer; Elvin H Geng; Julia L Marcus
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2022-01-05

3.  HIV Risk Characteristics Associated with Violence Against Women: A Longitudinal Study Among Women in the United States.

Authors:  Brooke E E Montgomery; Paula M Frew; James P Hughes; Jing Wang; Adaora A Adimora; Danielle F Haley; Irene Kuo; Larissa Jennings; Nabila El-Bassel; Sally L Hodder
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 2.681

4.  Development of a mucoinert progesterone nanosuspension for safer and more effective prevention of preterm birth.

Authors:  Thuy Hoang; Hannah Zierden; Abhijit Date; Jairo Ortiz; Sanjeev Gumber; Nicole Anders; Ping He; James Segars; Justin Hanes; Mala Mahendroo; Laura M Ensign
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2018-12-28       Impact factor: 9.776

5.  Influences on willingness to use vaginal or oral HIV PrEP during pregnancy and breastfeeding in Africa: the multisite MAMMA study.

Authors:  Ariane van der Straten; Julia H Ryan; Krishnaveni Reddy; Juliane Etima; Frank Taulo; Prisca Mutero; Jamilah Taylor; Jeanna Piper; Petina Musara
Journal:  J Int AIDS Soc       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 5.396

6.  Perspectives from Young South African and Zimbabwean Women on Attributes of Four (Placebo) Vaginal Microbicide Delivery Forms.

Authors:  R Weinrib; E N Browne; M K Shapley-Quinn; A van der Straten; M Beksinska; N Mgodi; P Musara; N Mphili; J L Schwartz; S Ju; H Hanif; E T Montgomery
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2020-02

7.  Pregnant and breastfeeding women's prospective acceptability of two biomedical HIV prevention approaches in Sub Saharan Africa: A multisite qualitative analysis using the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability.

Authors:  Mandeep Sekhon; Ariane van der Straten
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 3.752

8.  Qualitative exploration of intrinsic and extrinsic factors that influence acceptability of semisoft vaginal suppositories.

Authors:  Toral Zaveri; Kimberly A Powell; Kate M Guthrie; Alyssa J Bakke; Gregory R Ziegler; John E Hayes
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2018-10-20       Impact factor: 2.809

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.