Literature DB >> 28550170

Right atrial pressure and venous return during cardiopulmonary bypass.

Per W Moller1,2, Bernhard Winkler3, Samuel Hurni3, Paul Philipp Heinisch3, Andreas Bloch1, Soren Sondergaard4, Stephan M Jakob1, Jukka Takala1, David Berger5.   

Abstract

The relevance of right atrial pressure (RAP) as the backpressure for venous return (QVR) and mean systemic filling pressure as upstream pressure is controversial during dynamic changes of circulation. To examine the immediate response of QVR (sum of caval vein flows) to changes in RAP and pump function, we used a closed-chest, central cannulation, heart bypass porcine preparation (n = 10) with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Mean systemic filling pressure was determined by clamping extracorporeal membrane oxygenation tubing with open or closed arteriovenous shunt at euvolemia, volume expansion (9.75 ml/kg hydroxyethyl starch), and hypovolemia (bleeding 19.5 ml/kg after volume expansion). The responses of RAP and QVR were studied using variable pump speed at constant airway pressure (PAW) and constant pump speed at variable PAW Within each volume state, the immediate changes in QVR and RAP could be described with a single linear regression, regardless of whether RAP was altered by pump speed or PAW (r2 = 0.586-0.984). RAP was inversely proportional to pump speed from zero to maximum flow (r2 = 0.859-0.999). Changing PAW caused immediate, transient, directionally opposite changes in RAP and QVR (RAP: P ≤ 0.002 and QVR: P ≤ 0.001), where the initial response was proportional to the change in QVR driving pressure. Changes in PAW generated volume shifts into and out of the right atrium, but their effect on upstream pressure was negligible. Our findings support the concept that RAP acts as backpressure to QVR and that Guyton's model of circulatory equilibrium qualitatively predicts the dynamic response from changing RAP.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Venous return responds immediately to changes in right atrial pressure. Concomitant volume shifts within the systemic circulation due to an imbalance between cardiac output and venous return have negligible effects on mean systemic filling pressure. Guyton's model of circulatory equilibrium can qualitatively predict the resulting changes in dynamic conditions with right atrial pressure as backpressure to venous return.
Copyright © 2017 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cardiac output; extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; mean systemic filling pressure; right atrial pressure; venous return

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28550170     DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.00081.2017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol        ISSN: 0363-6135            Impact factor:   4.733


  11 in total

Review 1.  Determinants of systemic venous return and the impact of positive pressure ventilation.

Authors:  David Berger; Jukka Takala
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-09

2.  Statistical considerations in reporting cardiovascular research.

Authors:  Merry L Lindsey; Gillian A Gray; Susan K Wood; Douglas Curran-Everett
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 4.733

Review 3.  Venous return and the physical connection between distribution of segmental pressures and volumes.

Authors:  George L Brengelmann
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 4.733

Review 4.  Where Are We Heading With Fluid Responsiveness and Septic Shock?

Authors:  Mohammed Megri; Emily Fridenmaker; Margaret Disselkamp
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-04-03

Review 5.  Venous return and mean systemic filling pressure: physiology and clinical applications.

Authors:  Romain Persichini; Christopher Lai; Jean-Louis Teboul; Imane Adda; Laurent Guérin; Xavier Monnet
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 19.334

Review 6.  Heart-lung interactions during mechanical ventilation: the basics.

Authors:  Syed S Mahmood; Michael R Pinsky
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-09

7.  Effect of norepinephrine challenge on cardiovascular determinants assessed using a mathematical model in septic shock: a physiological study.

Authors:  Huaiwu He; Siyi Yuan; Yun Long; Dawei Liu; Xiang Zhou; Can Ince
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-04

8.  The inspiration hold maneuver is a reliable method to assess mean systemic filling pressure but its clinical value remains unclear.

Authors:  Lex M van Loon; Hans van der Hoeven; Peter H Veltink; Joris Lemson
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-11

9.  Transjugular Portosystemic Stent Shunt: Impact of Right Atrial Pressure on Portal Venous Hemodynamics Within the First Week.

Authors:  Michael Bernhard Pitton; Arndt Weinmann; Roman Kloeckner; Jens Mittler; Christian Ruckes; Christoph Düber; Gerd Otto
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 2.740

10.  Drainage From Superior Vena Cava Improves Upper Body Oxygenation in Patients on Femoral Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

Authors:  Tong Cai; Chenglong Li; Bo Xu; Liangshan Wang; Zhongtao Du; Xing Hao; Dong Guo; Zhichen Xing; Chunjing Jiang; Meng Xin; Pengcheng Wang; Qiushi Fan; Hong Wang; Xiaotong Hou
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-02-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.