Literature DB >> 28549980

Trends in malpractice claims for obstetric and gynecologic procedures, 2005 through 2014.

Laura M Glaser1, Farah A Alvi2, Magdy P Milad2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Interest in medical malpractice and areas of medicolegal vulnerability for practicing obstetricians and gynecologists has grown substantially, and many providers report changing surgical practice out of fear of litigation. Furthermore, education on medical malpractice and risk management is lacking for obstetrics and gynecology trainees. Recent obstetric and gynecologic malpractice claims data are lacking. We report on recent trends in malpractice claims for obstetrics and gynecology procedures, and compare these trends to those of other medical specialties.
OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate recent trends in malpractice claims for obstetrics and gynecology procedures and compare these to other medical specialties. STUDY
DESIGN: A search was performed on all medicolegal claims data for obstetrics and gynecology procedures from Jan. 1, 2005, through Dec. 31, 2014, using the Physician Insurers' Association of America data-sharing project, which was created to identify medical professional liability trends. Data from 20 insurance carriers were reviewed based on a search using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes and unique database-specific codes.
RESULTS: Of the 10,915 total claims closed from 2005 through 2014, the majority (59.5%) were dropped, withdrawn, or dismissed. The average indemnity of the remaining paid claims (31.1%) was $423,250. The most frequently litigated procedure was operative procedures on the uterus; 27.8% of cases were paid with an average indemnity of $279,384. The procedure associated with the highest proportion of paid claims was vacuum extraction. The average indemnity for paid obstetrics and gynecology procedural claims was 27% higher than that for all medical specialties combined. Obstetrics and gynecology procedural claims had the second highest average indemnity payment and the fifth highest paid-to-closed ratio of all medical specialties.
CONCLUSION: Litigation claims for obstetrics and gynecology procedures have higher average indemnity payments and higher paid-to-closed ratios than most other medical specialties. Claims most frequently relate to gynecologic surgery, but obstetric procedures are more expensive. Possible factors may include procedural experience and unique perioperative complications. We encourage efforts addressing procedures, litigation, and quality interventions to improve outcomes, mitigate risk, and potentially lower indemnity payments.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  gynecologic surgery; litigation; medical education

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28549980     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.05.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  5 in total

1.  Trend in cesarean delivery rate among twin pregnancies over a 20 years epoch and the accompanied maternal and perinatal outcomes.

Authors:  Alon Tal; Noah Zafran; Hadar Peretz; Gali Garmi; Shabtai Romano; Raed Salim
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X       Date:  2019-04-30

2.  Medical malpractice in stress urinary incontinence management: A 30-year legal database review.

Authors:  Niccola B Lynch; Linhan Xu; David Ambinder; Rena D Malik
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2021-08-02

Review 3.  Strategies for Cost Optimization in Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery.

Authors:  Youssef Youssef; Huda Afaneh; Mostafa A Borahay
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2022 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.789

Review 4.  Medical Malpractice Lawsuits Involving Trainees in Obstetrics and Gynecology in the USA.

Authors:  Summer Ghaith; Ronna L Campbell; Jordan R Pollock; Vanessa E Torbenson; Rachel A Lindor
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-17

5.  Major problems, current characteristics and future career plans of obstetrics and gynecology residents in Turkey.

Authors:  Selçuk Erkılınç; Murat Yassa; Buğra Coşkun; Onur İnce; Ateş Karateke
Journal:  Turk J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-10-10
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.