Literature DB >> 28549909

Poor-Quality and Counterfeit Drugs: A Systematic Assessment of Prevalence and Risks Based on Data Published From 2007 to 2016.

Andreas Koczwara1, Jennifer Dressman2.   

Abstract

Counterfeit drugs can hurt patients and harm the pharmaceutical industry. In 2006, the International Medical Products Anti-Counterfeiting Taskforce expressed a need to generate more and better data to calculate a worldwide prevalence of counterfeiting. This review analyzes field test data that were published in the time frame January 2007 to December 2016, were accessible via Pubmed, and which addressed the prevalence of counterfeit drugs. Based on the 41 studies identified, it is still not possible to make a reliable statement about the prevalence of counterfeit drugs due to the heterogeneity of the results. To make further progress in this area, both the quantity and quality of documented field tests should be increased. Without a differentiated analysis considering therapeutic class, source, and country of counterfeit drugs, it will remain difficult to identify the root causes of market infiltration and useful points of attack to combat them. Studies with high sample power and randomized sampling, packaging inspection, and detailed chemical analysis will be necessary to correctly identify (especially professional) counterfeit samples. The classification system presented in this review should help to calculate not only the prevalence of counterfeit drugs but also the risks to the patient associated with different types of counterfeited medicines.
Copyright © 2017 American Pharmacists Association®. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  TLC; anti-infectives; bioequivalence; chromatography; counterfeit drugs; dissolution; drug analysis; field test; poor-quality medicine

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28549909     DOI: 10.1016/j.xphs.2017.05.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharm Sci        ISSN: 0022-3549            Impact factor:   3.534


  6 in total

1.  Quantitative screening of the pharmaceutical ingredient for the rapid identification of substandard and falsified medicines using reflectance infrared spectroscopy.

Authors:  Graham Lawson; John Ogwu; Sangeeta Tanna
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Evaluating the quality of antihypertensive drugs in Lagos State, Nigeria.

Authors:  Elizabeth Thithi Ndichu; Kelechi Ohiri; Oluwafemi Sekoni; Olasunmbo Makinde; Kevin Schulman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Regulatory framework in Pakistan: situation analysis of medicine quality and future recommendations.

Authors:  Huma Rasheed; Ludwig Hoellein; Khalid Saeed Bukhari; Ulrike Holzgrabe
Journal:  J Pharm Policy Pract       Date:  2019-09-11

4.  The ghost in the data: Evidence gaps and the problem of fake drugs in global health research.

Authors:  Sarah Hodges; Emma Garnett
Journal:  Glob Public Health       Date:  2020-03-31

5.  A systematic review of substandard, falsified, unlicensed and unregistered medicine sampling studies: a focus on context, prevalence, and quality.

Authors:  Dominic McManus; Bernard David Naughton
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2020-08

6.  How Do We Combat Bogus Medicines in the Age of the COVID-19 Pandemic?

Authors:  Wubshet Tesfaye; Solomon Abrha; Mahipal Sinnollareddy; Bruce Arnold; Andrew Brown; Cynthia Matthew; Victor M Oguoma; Gregory M Peterson; Jackson Thomas
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 3.707

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.