Literature DB >> 28549600

Novel instrumented probe for measuring 3D pressure distribution along the vaginal canal.

Licia P Cacciari1, Anice C Pássaro1, Amanda C Amorim1, Manfred Geuder2, Isabel C N Sacco3.   

Abstract

We developed an intravaginal instrumented probe (covered with a 10×10 matrix of capacitive sensors) for assessing the three-dimensional (3D) spatiotemporal pressure profile of the vaginal canal. The pressure profile was compared to the pelvic floor (PF) digital assessment, and the reliability of the instrument and repeatability of the protocol was tested. We also tested its ability to characterize and differentiate two tasks: PF maximum contraction and Valsalva maneuver (maximum intra-abdominal effort with downward movement of the PF). Peak pressures were calculated for the total matrix, for three major sub-regions, and for 5 planes and 10 rings throughout the vaginal canal. Intraclass correlation coefficients indicated excellent inter- and intra-rater reliability and intra-trial repeatability for the total and medial areas, with moderate reliability for the cranial and caudal areas. There was a moderate correlation between peak pressure and PF digital palpation [Spearman's coefficient r=0.55 (p<0.001)]. Spatiotemporal profiles were completely different between tasks (2-way ANOVAs for repeated measures) with notably higher pressures (above 30kPa) for the maximum contraction task compared to Valsalva (below 15kPa). At maximum contraction, higher pressures occurred in the mid-antero-posterior zone, with earlier peak pressure onsets and more variable along the vaginal depth (from rings 3 to 10-caudal). During Valsalva, the highest pressures were observed in rings 4-6, with peak pressure onsets more synchronized between rings. With this protocol and novel instrument, we obtained a high-resolution and highly reliable innovative 3D pressure distribution map of the PF capable of distinguishing vaginal sub-regions, planes, rings and tasks.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Levator ani; Pelvic floor; Pressure distribution; Reliability; Strength; Vaginal closure force

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28549600     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.04.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  3 in total

Review 1.  Pelvic floor muscle activity during impact activities in continent and incontinent women: a systematic review.

Authors:  Helene Moser; Monika Leitner; Jean-Pierre Baeyens; Lorenz Radlinger
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Pelvic floor pressure distribution profile in urinary incontinence: a classification study with feature selection.

Authors:  Adriano Carafini; Marcus Fraga Vieira; Isabel C N Sacco
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  Reliability and validity of pelvic floor muscle strength assessment using the MizCure perineometer.

Authors:  Yui Abe-Takahashi; Takeya Kitta; Mifuka Ouchi; Minori Okayauchi; Hiroki Chiba; Madoka Higuchi; Mio Togo; Nobuo Shinohara
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 2.809

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.