Literature DB >> 28549599

Accuracy map of an optical motion capture system with 42 or 21 cameras in a large measurement volume.

Alexander M Aurand1, Jonathan S Dufour1, William S Marras2.   

Abstract

Optical motion capture is commonly used in biomechanics to measure human kinematics. However, no studies have yet examined the accuracy of optical motion capture in a large capture volume (>100m3), or how accuracy varies from the center to the extreme edges of the capture volume. This study measured the dynamic 3D errors of an optical motion capture system composed of 42 OptiTrack Prime 41 cameras (capture volume of 135m3) by comparing the motion of a single marker to the motion reported by a ThorLabs linear motion stage. After spline interpolating the data, it was found that 97% of the capture area had error below 200μm. When the same analysis was performed using only half (21) of the cameras, 91% of the capture area was below 200μm of error. The only locations that exceeded this threshold were at the extreme edges of the capture area, and no location had a mean error exceeding 1mm. When measuring human kinematics with skin-mounted markers, uncertainty of marker placement relative to underlying skeletal features and soft tissue artifact produce errors that are orders of magnitude larger than the errors attributed to the camera system itself. Therefore, the accuracy of this OptiTrack optical motion capture system was found to be more than sufficient for measuring full-body human kinematics with skin-mounted markers in a large capture volume (>100m3).
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Accuracy; Gait; Marker error; Measurement error; Motion capture; Motion tracking; Optical motion capture

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28549599     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.05.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  9 in total

1.  Accuracy measurement of different marker based motion analysis systems for biomechanical applications: A round robin study.

Authors:  Stefan Schroeder; Sebastian Jaeger; Jonas Schwer; Andreas Martin Seitz; Isabell Hamann; Michael Werner; Christoph Thorwaechter; Inês Santos; Toni Wendler; Dennis Nebel; Bastian Welke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 3.752

2.  Validation of an RF Image System for Real-Time Tracking Neurosurgical Tools.

Authors:  Carolina Blanco-Angulo; Andrea Martínez-Lozano; Carlos G Juan; Roberto Gutiérrez-Mazón; Julia Arias-Rodríguez; Ernesto Ávila-Navarro; José M Sabater-Navarro
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 3.847

3.  Lower spinal postural variability during laptop-work in subjects with cervicogenic headache compared to healthy controls.

Authors:  Sarah Mingels; Wim Dankaerts; Ludo van Etten; Liesbeth Bruckers; Marita Granitzer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Quantitative Evaluation of Gait Changes Using APDM Inertial Sensors After the External Lumbar Drain in Patients With Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus.

Authors:  Mengmeng He; Zhenyu Qi; Yunxiang Shao; Hui Yao; Xuewen Zhang; Yang Zhang; Yu Shi; Qinzhi E; Chengming Liu; Hongwei Hu; Jiangang Liu; Xiaoou Sun; Zhong Wang; Yulun Huang
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 4.003

5.  Measurements of cervical range of motion using an optical motion capture system: Repeatability and validity.

Authors:  Minshan Feng; Long Liang; Wu Sun; Guang Wei Liu; Xunlu Yin; Tao Han; Xu Wei; Liguo Zhu
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 2.447

6.  On the Noise Complexity in an Optical Motion Capture Facility.

Authors:  Przemysław Skurowski; Magdalena Pawlyta
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-13       Impact factor: 3.576

7.  A Quality Control Check to Ensure Comparability of Stereophotogrammetric Data between Sessions and Systems.

Authors:  Kirsty Scott; Tecla Bonci; Lisa Alcock; Ellen Buckley; Clint Hansen; Eran Gazit; Lars Schwickert; Andrea Cereatti; Claudia Mazzà
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 3.576

8.  Benchmarking Built-In Tracking Systems for Indoor AR Applications on Popular Mobile Devices.

Authors:  Emanuele Marino; Fabio Bruno; Loris Barbieri; Antonio Lagudi
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 3.847

9.  Uniqueness of gait kinematics in a cohort study.

Authors:  Gunwoo Park; Kyoung Min Lee; Seungbum Koo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-27       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.