Philipp J Koch1, Friedhelm C Hummel. 1. aDefitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, Center for Neuroprosthetics (CNP) and Brain Mind Institute (BMI), Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL), Geneva bDefitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, Center for Neuroprosthetics (CNP) and Brain Mind Institute (BMI), Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL Valais), Clinique Romande de Réadaptation, Sion cClinical Neuroscience, University of Geneva Medical School, Geneva, Switzerland.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To support the recovery of disability and the reduced functional capacity influencing the independence of daily life after focal brain lesions like stroke, the application of noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation or transcranial electric stimulation has been found useful in the last decades. Still, a positive influence on the recovery seems to be restricted to specific subgroups of patients. Therefore, a closer look on individual parameters influencing the recovery course and the effect of NIBS is needed. RECENT FINDINGS: Neuroimaging studies investigated alterations in neuronal network settings during the recovery process from stroke and can explain a relevant amount of variance in residual motor function. In this regard for instance, the microstructural integrity of the corticospinal tract and its influence on cortical and subcortical functional and structural connectivity alterations shows a relevant impact on individual recovery from the acute to the chronic state. SUMMARY: Based on this understanding, a 'one-suits-all' NIBS strategy for clinical application appears insufficient and understanding of therapeutic susceptibility to NIBS gained from structural and functional imaging studies will help to develop patient-tailored NIBS-based interventional strategies towards precision medicine, as a promising future prospective within this field.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To support the recovery of disability and the reduced functional capacity influencing the independence of daily life after focal brain lesions like stroke, the application of noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation or transcranial electric stimulation has been found useful in the last decades. Still, a positive influence on the recovery seems to be restricted to specific subgroups of patients. Therefore, a closer look on individual parameters influencing the recovery course and the effect of NIBS is needed. RECENT FINDINGS: Neuroimaging studies investigated alterations in neuronal network settings during the recovery process from stroke and can explain a relevant amount of variance in residual motor function. In this regard for instance, the microstructural integrity of the corticospinal tract and its influence on cortical and subcortical functional and structural connectivity alterations shows a relevant impact on individual recovery from the acute to the chronic state. SUMMARY: Based on this understanding, a 'one-suits-all' NIBS strategy for clinical application appears insufficient and understanding of therapeutic susceptibility to NIBS gained from structural and functional imaging studies will help to develop patient-tailored NIBS-based interventional strategies towards precision medicine, as a promising future prospective within this field.
Authors: Adrian G Guggisberg; Philipp J Koch; Friedhelm C Hummel; Cathrin M Buetefisch Journal: Clin Neurophysiol Date: 2019-04-15 Impact factor: 3.708
Authors: Martina Coscia; Maximilian J Wessel; Ujwal Chaudary; José Del R Millán; Silvestro Micera; Adrian Guggisberg; Philippe Vuadens; John Donoghue; Niels Birbaumer; Friedhelm C Hummel Journal: Brain Date: 2019-08-01 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Johannes Boltze; Jaroslaw A Aronowski; Jerome Badaut; Marion S Buckwalter; Mateo Caleo; Michael Chopp; Kunjan R Dave; Nadine Didwischus; Rick M Dijkhuizen; Thorsten R Doeppner; Jens P Dreier; Karim Fouad; Mathias Gelderblom; Karen Gertz; Dominika Golubczyk; Barbara A Gregson; Edith Hamel; Daniel F Hanley; Wolfgang Härtig; Friedhelm C Hummel; Maulana Ikhsan; Miroslaw Janowski; Jukka Jolkkonen; Saravanan S Karuppagounder; Richard F Keep; Inga K Koerte; Zaal Kokaia; Peiying Li; Fudong Liu; Ignacio Lizasoain; Peter Ludewig; Gerlinde A S Metz; Axel Montagne; Andre Obenaus; Alex Palumbo; Monica Pearl; Miguel Perez-Pinzon; Anna M Planas; Nikolaus Plesnila; Ami P Raval; Maria A Rueger; Lauren H Sansing; Farida Sohrabji; Charlotte J Stagg; R Anne Stetler; Ann M Stowe; Dandan Sun; Akihiko Taguchi; Mickael Tanter; Sabine U Vay; Raghu Vemuganti; Denis Vivien; Piotr Walczak; Jian Wang; Ye Xiong; Marietta Zille Journal: Front Aging Neurosci Date: 2021-01-28 Impact factor: 5.750
Authors: Gilles Allali; Helena M Blumen; Hervé Devanne; Elvira Pirondini; Arnaud Delval; Dimitri Van De Ville Journal: Neurophysiol Clin Date: 2018-10-25 Impact factor: 3.734