Literature DB >> 28548236

Renal functional outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous cryoablation or partial nephrectomy for a solitary renal mass.

Ross J Mason1, Thomas D Atwell2, Christine Lohse3, Bimal Bhindi1, Adam Weisbrod2, Stephen A Boorjian1, Bradley C Leibovich1, Grant D Schmit2, R Houston Thompson1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare renal functional changes after percutaneous cryoablation (PCA) or partial nephrectomy (PN). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent PCA or PN for a solitary renal mass at a single institution were identified (2003-2013). Estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFRs) were calculated at baseline, discharge, and at the 3-month follow-up using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation. Changes in renal function were compared between groups using 1:1 propensity score (PS) matching, adjustment for PS quintile, and inverse probability weighting (IPW).
RESULTS: There were 2 040 procedures available for the PS analyses, including 448 PCA and 1 592 PN. After PS adjustments, there were no significant differences in baseline clinical features between PCA and PN patients. In the PS-matched analysis, the change in eGFR from baseline to discharge for PCA and PN patients was -3.1 and -1.1 mL/min/1.73 m2 , respectively (P = 0.038), with percentage changes of -4.5% and 0% respectively (P = 0.006). From baseline to the 3-month follow-up, the absolute change in eGFR for PCA and PN patients was -4.3 and -2.1 mL/min/1.73 m2 , respectively (P = 0.008), and the percentage change was -6.1% and -2.4% respectively (P = 0.005). Similar results were obtained after adjusting for PS quintiles and in the IPW analysis. Importantly, the rate of chronic kidney disease stage progression at the 3-month follow-up was similar between the groups (21% vs 18%).
CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm that both PCA and PN have a minor impact on renal function. While we observed a statistically greater decline in eGFR after PCA compared with PN, both approaches result in excellent preservation of renal function.
© 2017 The Authors BJU International © 2017 BJU International Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cryoablation; kidney neoplasms; partial nephrectomy; renal cell carcinoma; renal function

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28548236     DOI: 10.1111/bju.13917

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  5 in total

1.  Local ablation vs partial nephrectomy in T1N0M0 renal cell carcinoma: An inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis.

Authors:  Lei Shi; Yan He; Chang Liu; Xiaoyuan Qian; Zhixian Wang
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-09-05       Impact factor: 4.452

2.  Comparisons of percutaneous versus retroperitoneoscopic cryoablation for renal masses.

Authors:  Hui-Ying Liu; Shu-Huei Shen; Lin-Nei Hsu; Po-Hui Chiang
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  Partial nephrectomy versus ablative techniques for small renal masses: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Johannes Uhlig; Arne Strauss; Gerta Rücker; Ali Seif Amir Hosseini; Joachim Lotz; Lutz Trojan; Hyun S Kim; Annemarie Uhlig
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Early trends and predictors of renal function following computed tomography-guided percutaneous cryoablation of a renal mass in patients with and without prior renal impairment.

Authors:  Pedro V Staziaki; Harshna V Vadvala; Vanessa Fiorini Furtado; Dania Daye; Ronald S Arellano; Raul N Uppot
Journal:  Radiol Bras       Date:  2020 May-Jun

Review 5.  Cryoablation versus Partial Nephrectomy for Clinical Stage T1 Renal Masses: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Wen Deng; Luyao Chen; Yibing Wang; Xiaoqiang Liu; Gongxian Wang; Weipeng Liu; Cheng Zhang; Xiaochen Zhou; Yu Li; Bin Fu
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 4.207

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.