Literature DB >> 28547688

Bioassay versus chemical assay: measuring the impact of induced and constitutive resistance on herbivores in the field.

Nora Underwood1, Mark Rausher2, Will Cook2.   

Abstract

Studies of induced plant resistance usually either examine physiological/chemical mechanisms or explore the ecological and evolutionary role of induced resistance. To connect these two methods of study, data are needed that address the relationships between plant chemistry and effects of induced resistance on herbivores under field conditions. In this paper we combine the results of a greenhouse experiment and a field experiment to try to make such a connection. Levels of induced and constitutive resistance to Mexican bean beetles in several soybean genotypes were measured in a greenhouse experiment using a behavioral bioassay. In a field experiment, beetle performance and induced and constitutive levels of cystein proteinase inhibitor activity were measured for these same genotypes. Greenhouse bioassay ratings of induced and constitutive resistance and induced and constitutive levels of proteinase inhibitor activity agree closely for individual genotypes, suggesting that proteinase inhibitors (PIs) are involved in induced resistance. However, while greenhouse bioassay measures of constitutive and induced resistance were good predictors of beetle performance in the field, proteinase inhibitor activity did not predict beetle performance well. While PIs appear to be involved in induced resistance, they were not strongly correlated to Mexican bean beetle performance in the field in this study. These results suggest that measurement of single aspects of plant chemistry may not encompass all ecologically important aspects of plant resistance.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Epilachna verivestis; Glycine max; Herbivore performance; Induced resistance; Proteinase inhibitors

Year:  2002        PMID: 28547688     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-002-0867-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  7 in total

1.  Plant-mediated effects on an insect-pathogen interaction vary with intraspecific genetic variation in plant defences.

Authors:  Ikkei Shikano; Ketia L Shumaker; Michelle Peiffer; Gary W Felton; Kelli Hoover
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  A test of genotypic variation in specificity of herbivore-induced responses in Solidago altissima L. (Asteraceae).

Authors:  Akane Uesugi; Erik H Poelman; André Kessler
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Methyl jasmonate increases the tropane alkaloid scopolamine and reduces natural herbivory in Brugmansia suaveolens: is scopolamine responsible for plant resistance?

Authors:  A Arab; M N Alves; A Sartoratto; D C Ogasawara; J R Trigo
Journal:  Neotrop Entomol       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 1.434

4.  Differential proteomic analysis of Arabidopsis thaliana genotypes exhibiting resistance or susceptibility to the insect herbivore, Plutella xylostella.

Authors:  Richard M Collins; Muhammed Afzal; Deborah A Ward; Mark C Prescott; Steven M Sait; Huw H Rees; A Brian Tomsett
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Interspecific variation of plant traits associated with resistance to herbivory among four species of Ficus (moraceae).

Authors:  Hui Xiang; Jin Chen
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2004-07-26       Impact factor: 4.357

6.  Chemical and physical defence in early and late leaves in three heterophyllous birch species native to northern Japan.

Authors:  Sawako Matsuki; Yuzou Sano; Takayoshi Koike
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2003-12-12       Impact factor: 4.357

7.  Comparison of leaf life span, photosynthesis and defensive traits across seven species of deciduous broad-leaf tree seedlings.

Authors:  Sawako Matsuki; Takayoshi Koike
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2006-03-01       Impact factor: 4.357

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.