Literature DB >> 28547627

Root competition between beech and oak: a hypothesis.

Christoph Leuschner1, Dietrich Hertel1, Heinz Coners1, Volker Büttner1.   

Abstract

Little is known about below-ground competition between different tree species in mixed forests. We investigated the evidence for asymmetric competition between fine roots (<2 mm) of adult European beech (Fagus sylvatica) and sessile oak (Quercus petraea) trees in a mixed temperate beech-oak forest by (1) conducting fine-root growth experiments in the field (root chamber technique), (2) comparing the fine-root mass of two-species and monospecific plots, and (3) analysing the density and overlap of beech and oak root systems in shared soil volumes. Field experiments with root chambers, which allow fine-root endings to grow under controlled conditions for several months, showed that beech grew more rapidly than oak roots when both species were grown together. In the mixed beech-oak wood, where stem densities and leaf areas of the two species were similar, beech outnumbered oak three- to five-fold in fine-root biomass, and root tip and ectomycorrhiza numbers, which led to a much greater root:shoot ratio (root area index:leaf area index, RAI:LAI) for beech (3.9) than oak (1.7). The remarkably small fine-root biomass of oak was attributed to competitive replacement by beech roots as indicated by comparison with monospecific oak wood. Although oak had much less fine-root mass than beech, oak outnumbered beech in the coarse root fraction (2<d<5 mm) resulting in a greater fine root:coarse root ratio in beech than oak. The fine-root systems of the two species completely overlapped in the nitrogen-rich organic topsoil but differed with respect to their horizontal distribution patterns: beech root biomass increased with increasing distance from a beech stem whereas oak root mass was not dependent on stem distance. Beech (but not oak) root mass was correlated with the thickness of the organic topsoil horizons which, at average, were thicker at greater distances from beech stems. We conclude that beech fine roots colonise nitrogen-rich patches in the organic horizons of this forest more successfully than do oak roots. Our results (root chamber experiments, oak root abundance in mixed vs. monospecific wood, beech root dominance in the organic topsoil) suggest that asymmetric interspecific root competition in favour of beech exists in this stand.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Below-ground competition; Competition experiment; Fine roots; Horizontal root distribution; Mixed forest

Year:  2001        PMID: 28547627     DOI: 10.1007/s004420000507

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  13 in total

1.  Conversion of tropical lowland forest reduces nutrient return through litterfall, and alters nutrient use efficiency and seasonality of net primary production.

Authors:  Martyna M Kotowska; Christoph Leuschner; Triadiati Triadiati; Dietrich Hertel
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Size-growth asymmetry is not consistently related to productivity across an eastern US temperate forest network.

Authors:  Alex Dye; M Ross Alexander; Daniel Bishop; Daniel Druckenbrod; Neil Pederson; Amy Hessl
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Patterns in spatial distribution and root trait syndromes for ecto and arbuscular mycorrhizal temperate trees in a mixed broadleaf forest.

Authors:  Oscar J Valverde-Barrantes; Kurt A Smemo; Larry M Feinstein; Mark W Kershner; Christopher B Blackwood
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  The effect of tree species diversity on fine-root production in a young temperate forest.

Authors:  Pifeng Lei; Michael Scherer-Lorenzen; Jürgen Bauhus
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Mixing Eucalyptus and Acacia trees leads to fine root over-yielding and vertical segregation between species.

Authors:  Jean-Paul Laclau; Yann Nouvellon; Caroline Reine; José Leonardo de Moraes Gonçalves; Alex Vladimir Krushe; Christophe Jourdan; Guerric le Maire; Jean-Pierre Bouillet
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  The distribution of carbon stocks between tree woody biomass and soil differs between Scots pine and broadleaved species (beech, oak) in European forests.

Authors:  Richard Osei; Miren Del Río; Ricardo Ruiz-Peinado; Hugues Titeux; Kamil Bielak; Felipe Bravo; Catherine Collet; Corentin Cools; Jean-Thomas Cornelis; Lars Drössler; Michael Heym; Nathalie Korboulewsky; Magnus Löf; Bart Muys; Yasmina Najib; Arne Nothdurft; Hans Pretzsch; Jerzy Skrzyszewski; Quentin Ponette
Journal:  Eur J For Res       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 3.140

7.  Cacao Cultivation under Diverse Shade Tree Cover Allows High Carbon Storage and Sequestration without Yield Losses.

Authors:  Yasmin Abou Rajab; Christoph Leuschner; Henry Barus; Aiyen Tjoa; Dietrich Hertel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Tropical Andean forests are highly susceptible to nutrient inputs--rapid effects of experimental N and P addition to an Ecuadorian montane forest.

Authors:  Jürgen Homeier; Dietrich Hertel; Tessa Camenzind; Nixon L Cumbicus; Mark Maraun; Guntars O Martinson; L Nohemy Poma; Matthias C Rillig; Dorothee Sandmann; Stefan Scheu; Edzo Veldkamp; Wolfgang Wilcke; Hans Wullaert; Christoph Leuschner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Effects of nutrient heterogeneity and competition on root architecture of spruce seedlings: implications for an essential feature of root foraging.

Authors:  Hongwei Nan; Qing Liu; Jinsong Chen; Xinying Cheng; Huajun Yin; Chunying Yin; Chunzhang Zhao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Temporal changes of fine root overyielding and foraging strategies in planted monoculture and mixed forests.

Authors:  Weiwei Shu; Xiaoxiao Shen; Pifeng Lei; Wenhua Xiang; Shuai Ouyang; Wende Yan
Journal:  BMC Ecol       Date:  2018-02-17       Impact factor: 2.964

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.