Literature DB >> 28547596

Limitations on photosynthesis of competing individuals in stands and the consequences for canopy structure.

Niels P Anten1, Tadaki Hirose1.   

Abstract

The canopy structure of a stand of vegetation is determined by the growth patterns of the individual plants within the stand and the competitive interactions among them. We analyzed the carbon gain of individuals in two dense monospecific stands of Xanthium canadense and evaluated the consequences for intra-specific competition and whole-stand canopy structure. The stands differed in productivity, and this was associated with differences in nitrogen availability. Canopy structure, aboveground mass, and nitrogen contents per unit leaf area (N area) were determined for individuals, and leaf photosynthesis was measured as a function of N area. These data were used to calculate the daily carbon gain of individuals. Within stands, photosynthesis per unit aboveground mass (P mass) of individual plants increased with plant height, despite the lower leaf area ratios of taller plants. The differences in P mass between the tallest most dominant and shortest most subordinate plants were greater in the high-nitrogen than in the low-nitrogen stand. This indicated that competition was asymmetric and that this asymmetry increased with nitrogen availability. In the high-nitrogen stand, taller plants had a higher P mass than shorter ones, because they captured more light per unit mass and because they had higher photosynthesis per unit of absorbed light. Conversely, in the low-nitrogen stand, the differences in P mass between plants of different heights resulted only from differences in their light capture per unit mass. Sensitivity analyses revealed that an increase in N area, keeping leaf area of plants constant, increased whole-plant carbon gain for the taller more dominant plants but reduced carbon gain in the shorter more subordinate ones, which implies that the N area values of shorter plants were greater than the optimal values for maximum photosynthesis. On the other hand, the carbon gain of all individual plants, keeping their total canopy N constant, was positively related to an increase in their individual leaf area. At the same time, however, increasing the leaf area for all plants simultaneously reduced the carbon gain of the whole stand. This result shows that the optimal leaf area index (LAI), which maximizes photosynthesis of a stand, is not evolutionarily stable because at this LAI, any individual can increase its carbon gain by increasing its leaf area.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Evolutionarily stable strategy; Intra-specific competition; Leaf area; Nitrogen content; Whole-plant photosynthesis

Year:  2001        PMID: 28547596     DOI: 10.1007/s004420100718

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  10 in total

1.  Forest structure and carbon dynamics in Amazonian tropical rain forests.

Authors:  Simone Vieira; Plinio Barbosa de Camargo; Diogo Selhorst; Roseana da Silva; Lucy Hutyra; Jeffrey Q Chambers; I Foster Brown; Niro Higuchi; Joaquim dos Santos; Steven C Wofsy; Susan E Trumbore; Luiz Antonio Martinelli
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2004-06-17       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Plant population growth and competition in a light gradient: a mathematical model of canopy partitioning.

Authors:  Richard R Vance; Andrew L Nevai
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2006-10-21       Impact factor: 2.691

3.  Salinity and light interactively affect neotropical mangrove seedlings at the leaf and whole plant levels.

Authors:  Laura López-Hoffman; Niels P R Anten; Miguel Martínez-Ramos; David D Ackerly
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2006-10-06       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Dynamics of leaf area and nitrogen in the canopy of an annual herb, Xanthium canadense.

Authors:  Shimpei Oikawa; Kouki Hikosaka; Tadaki Hirose
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2005-03-24       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Plant interspecies competition for sunlight: a mathematical model of canopy partitioning.

Authors:  Andrew L Nevai; Richard R Vance
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2007-02-10       Impact factor: 2.259

6.  Reproductive yield of individuals competing for light in a dense stand of an annual, Xanthium canadense.

Authors:  Yosuke Matsumoto; Shimpei Oikawa; Yuko Yasumura; Tadaki Hirose; Kouki Hikosaka
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2008-06-06       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Whole-canopy carbon gain as a result of selection on individual performance of ten genotypes of a clonal plant.

Authors:  Peter J Vermeulen; Niels P R Anten; Josef F Stuefer; Heinjo J During
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 8.  Is analysing the nitrogen use at the plant canopy level a matter of choosing the right optimization criterion?

Authors:  Niels P R Anten; Heinjo J During
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2011-05-13       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Changes in light- and nitrogen-use and in aboveground biomass allocation patterns along productivity gradients in grasslands.

Authors:  Anne Aan; Krista Lõhmus; Arne Sellin; Olevi Kull
Journal:  J Plant Res       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 2.629

10.  Genotypic and Phenotypic Diversity Does Not Affect Productivity and Drought Response in Competitive Stands of Trifolium repens.

Authors:  Heidrun Huber; Heinjo J During; Fabienne Bruine de Bruin; Peter J Vermeulen; Niels P R Anten
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 5.753

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.