Literature DB >> 28547418

Positive and negative plant interactions contribute to a north-south-patterned association between two desert shrub species.

Jochen H Schenk1, Bruce E Mahall2.   

Abstract

Abiotic factors are often thought to be the predominant forces shaping desert plant communities. But both positive and negative interactions between plants are frequently observed in deserts, and it is an open question whether they can strongly affect the spatial structure of a desert community. The goal of this study was to answer this question for a plant community in the North American Mojave Desert. Two semi-shrub species, Ambrosia dumosa and Acamptopappus sphaerocephalus, were the focus of this study. At the study site, seedlings emerged predominantly on the northern side of shrubs, indicating positive effects of canopy shading on emergence, but survival of Ambrosia seedlings was much higher in open areas than at the edge of conspecific shrubs. Negative intraspecific interactions also affected Ambrosia shrubs, which did not increase in size over a 4-year period unless the nearest conspecific neighbor had been removed. These negative intraspecific interactions among different life stages of Ambrosia appear to contribute to spatial segregation observed among shrubs of this species. In contrast, Acamptopappus shrubs and their seedlings were aggregated with Ambrosia shrubs, and occurred more often on the northern side of Ambrosia than expected by chance. Removal of Ambrosia neighbors positively affected growth of Acamptopappus, but only when the neighbor was removed on the northern side. For Acamptopappus, an Ambrosia neighbor on the southern side may have some positive effects, which appear to neutralize the negative effects found for northern neighbors. These positive effects were likely at least partly due to shading. Removal of Ambrosia neighbors negatively affected predawn xylem pressure potentials of Acamptopappus, but this effect was only found during one growing season and was briefly reversed during the next. In summary, negative intraspecific interactions appear to cause spatial segregation of Ambrosia shrubs, while a combination of positive and negative interactions apparently contribute to the directional association between Ambrosia and Acamptopappus. Thus plant interactions in this desert appear to shape community structure in at least two dimensions by influencing the distances and in which directions to their neighbors plants can grow and survive.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Competition; Directionality; Facilitation; Seedling survival; Spatial patterns

Year:  2002        PMID: 28547418     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-002-0990-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  5 in total

1.  The role of nurse plants in the establishment of shrub seedlings in the semi-arid subtropical Andes.

Authors:  Ramiro Pablo López; Sergio Valdivia; Ninel Sanjinés; Diego de la Quintana
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2007-03-28       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Monitoring structural assets of bi-species groves according to land use types: a case study from arid plains.

Authors:  Amin U Khan
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  The global distribution and environmental drivers of aboveground versus belowground plant biomass.

Authors:  Haozhi Ma; Lidong Mo; Thomas W Crowther; Daniel S Maynard; Johan van den Hoogen; Benjamin D Stocker; César Terrer; Constantin M Zohner
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 15.460

4.  Do co-occurring plant species adapt to one another? The response of Bromus erectus to the presence of different Thymus vulgaris chemotypes.

Authors:  Bodil K Ehlers; John Thompson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2004-08-11       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 5.  Impacts of shrub encroachment on ecosystem structure and functioning: towards a global synthesis.

Authors:  David J Eldridge; Matthew A Bowker; Fernando T Maestre; Erin Roger; James F Reynolds; Walter G Whitford
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2011-05-19       Impact factor: 9.492

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.