Literature DB >> 28547413

How important is the relationship between Protea humiflora (Proteaceae) and its non-flying mammal pollinators?

P Fleming1, S Nicolson2.   

Abstract

The interaction between Protea humiflora and its non-flying mammal pollinators was investigated with the aim of quantifying the relationship for both the plants and mammals involved. We manipulated flower density by inflorescence removal and determined the effect upon mammal captures, and excluded mammals to determine their effect upon seed set. Of three mammal species captured frequently, the smallest, Acomys subspinosus (18±4 SD g, Rodentia: Muridae), demonstrated the strongest relationship with P. humiflora. Breeding coincided with flowering, and pollen constituted 33.5±27.5% by volume (max 80%, n=19) of winter scats. Acomys captures on control grids were twice those on inflorescence-removal grids during flowering. Aethomys namaquensis (51±14 g, Rodentia: Muridae) included flower products in its diet (pollen comprising 3.2±4.9% of winter scats, n=73), but captures were not affected by inflorescence removal. Aethomys is a seasonal breeder and juveniles entered the population 2 months after flowering. Elephantulus edwardii, although an insectivore (48±7 g, Macroscelidea: Macroscelididae), carried more pollen grains on its nose than the rodents, acquired while foraging in inflorescences for insects. Pollen comprised 3.1±5.4% (n=23) of winter scats. From the plant perspective, seed set was significantly reduced in caged inflorescences and in those >20 cm above the ground, presumably due to limited accessibility by terrestrial animals. We conclude that small mammals are responsible for around half (56%) of the effective seed set in P. humiflora.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acomys; Aethomys; Elephantulus; Nectar; Pollen

Year:  2002        PMID: 28547413     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-002-0921-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  7 in total

1.  Pollination systems of Colchicum (Colchicaceae) in southern Africa: evidence for rodent pollination.

Authors:  Ciara Kleizen; Jeremy Midgley; Steven D Johnson
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2008-08-23       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  Adaptation for rodent pollination in Leucospermum arenarium (Proteaceae) despite rapid pollen loss during grooming.

Authors:  Christopher Michael Johnson; Anton Pauw
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  Sticky snack for sengis: the Cape rock elephant-shrew, Elephantulus edwardii (Macroscelidea), as a pollinator of the Pagoda lily, Whiteheadia bifolia (Hyacinthaceae).

Authors:  Petra Wester
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2010-11-16

4.  Xylose utilization and short-chain fatty acid production by selected components of the intestinal microflora of a rodent pollinator (Aethomys namaquensis).

Authors:  S A Johnson; S Jackson; V R Abratt; G M Wolfaardt; R Cordero-Otero; S W Nicolson
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2006-05-05       Impact factor: 2.200

5.  Rodent responses to volatile compounds provide insights into the function of floral scent in mammal-pollinated plants.

Authors:  Steven D Johnson; Keeveshnee Govender
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 6.671

6.  Adding perches for cross-pollination ensures the reproduction of a self-incompatible orchid.

Authors:  Zhong-Jian Liu; Li-Jun Chen; Ke-Wei Liu; Li-Qiang Li; Wen-Hui Rao; Yu-Ting Zhang; Guang-Da Tang; Lai-Qiang Huang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The Small Mammal Sequence from the c. 76 - 72 ka Still Bay Levels at Blombos Cave, South Africa - Taphonomic and Palaeoecological Implications for Human Behaviour.

Authors:  Turid Hillestad Nel; Christopher Stuart Henshilwood
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.