Literature DB >> 28547280

Hierarchical habitat selection by barren-ground grizzly bears in the central Canadian Arctic.

Philip D McLoughlin1, Ray L Case2, Robert J Gau2, Dean H Cluff2, Robert Mulders2, François Messier3.   

Abstract

Using resource selection functions, we examined habitat selection patterns of barren-ground grizzly bears (Ursus arctos) in the central Canadian Arctic among and within home ranges. There was no difference between the sexes with regard to habitat selection patterns at the home range level (Wilks' λ, approx. F 11,11=1.27, P=0.37). Bear home ranges contain more esker habitat, tussock/hummock successional tundra, lichen veneer, birch seep, and tall shrub riparian areas relative to the proportional availability of habitats in the study area. We observed differences in habitat selection within home ranges among levels of sex/reproductive status (Wilks' λ, approx. F 20,412=3.32, P<0.001) and by season (Wilks' λ, approx. F 30,605=2.71, P<0.001). Eskers and tall shrub riparian zones were the habitats most preferred by bears throughout the year. Tussock/hummock successional tundra was also favored by males at varying times during the year and lichen veneers were favored in spring and autumn by most bears. Females with cubs tended to avoid the highest ranked habitat for males throughout the year. This pattern of habitat selection was not observed for females without accompanying young. Results of this study underline the importance of scale dependence in habitat selection. Failure to view habitat selection as a hierarchical process may result in a narrow and possibly misleading notion of habitat selection patterns.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Grizzly bear; Habitat selection; Resource selection function; Spatial scale; Temporal scale

Year:  2002        PMID: 28547280     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-002-0941-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  7 in total

1.  The shared preference niche of sympatric Asiatic black bears and sun bears in a tropical forest mosaic.

Authors:  Robert Steinmetz; David L Garshelis; Wanlop Chutipong; Naret Seuaturien
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-01-20       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  A "clearcut" case? Brown bear selection of coarse woody debris and carpenter ants on clearcuts.

Authors:  Shane C Frank; Sam M J G Steyaert; Jon E Swenson; Ilse Storch; Jonas Kindberg; Hanna Barck; Andreas Zedrosser
Journal:  For Ecol Manage       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 3.558

Review 3.  Denning in brown bears.

Authors:  Enrique González-Bernardo; Luca Francesco Russo; Esther Valderrábano; Ángel Fernández; Vincenzo Penteriani
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 2.912

4.  Time-dependent memory and individual variation in Arctic brown bears (Ursus arctos).

Authors:  Peter R Thompson; Mark A Lewis; Mark A Edwards; Andrew E Derocher
Journal:  Mov Ecol       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 3.600

5.  Predicting grizzly bear density in western North America.

Authors:  Garth Mowat; Douglas C Heard; Carl J Schwarz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Effects of Prey Presence and Scale on Bobcat Resource Selection during Winter.

Authors:  Florent Bled; Savanna Summers; Deborah Martell; Tyler R Petroelje; Dean E Beyer; Jerrold L Belant
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Postrelease movement and habitat selection of translocated pine martens Martes martes.

Authors:  Catherine M McNicol; David Bavin; Stuart Bearhop; Josie Bridges; Elizabeth Croose; Robin Gill; Cecily E D Goodwin; John Lewis; Jenny MacPherson; Daniel Padfield; Henry Schofield; Matthew J Silk; Alexandra J Tomlinson; Robbie A McDonald
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 3.167

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.