Literature DB >> 28547174

Foraging behaviour of brent geese, Branta b. bernicla, on grasslands: effects of sward length and nitrogen content.

Mark Hassall1, Roger Riddington1, Alvin Helden1.   

Abstract

Feeding behaviour and preferences of brent geese, Branta b. bernicla were observed on pastures of different sward lengths and nitrogen contents. On swards of 2.0-6.0 cm captive geese took larger bites and had a higher intake rate when feeding on 6-cm swards than when feeding on shorter ones. In the field wild geese chose 6-cm swards in preference to both shorter and longer ones. For unfertilized pastures there was a strong negative relationship between nitrogen content and sward height: 11-cm swards contained 2.8% nitrogen, 3.5-cm swards 4.2% nitrogen. Application of 75 kg N ha-1 organically based fertilizer at the end of October eliminated this relationship between nitrogen content and sward height, swards of all heights then having a mean content of 4.1% N. On fertilized plots the geese preferred swards longer than 6 cm with no indication of a decrease in preference up to the maximum height investigated, 16 cm. Breaking strain of grass laminae was measured to give an indication of the proportion of strengthening tissues in the leaves and hence their digestibility. Apical laminae from longer swards had a higher breaking strain than those from shorter swards. Unfertilized swards had a higher breaking strain than fertilized swards but the difference in breaking strain between long and short swards was the same on fertilized and control treatments. These results are discussed in relation to the forage maturation hypothesis and are interpreted as indicating that the primary constraint on maximizing energy intake rates is not the reduced energy digestibility of older foliage but the reduced nitrogen content in the higher-biomass swards. We conclude that it is the balance between maximizing energy intake and nitrogen absorption rates which results in the observed preference for intermediate-height swards.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Digestibility; Energy intake rates; Feeding strategies; Grazing wildfowl; Nitrogen content

Year:  2001        PMID: 28547174     DOI: 10.1007/s004420000563

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  6 in total

1.  Site selection by geese in a suburban landscape.

Authors:  Quentin J Groom; Tim Adriaens; Claire Colsoulle; Pauline Delhez; Iris Van der Beeten
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 2.984

2.  Water level affects availability of optimal feeding habitats for threatened migratory waterbirds.

Authors:  Yaara Aharon-Rotman; John McEvoy; Zheng Zhaoju; Hui Yu; Xin Wang; Yali Si; Zhenggang Xu; Zeng Yuan; Wooseog Jeong; Lei Cao; Anthony D Fox
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 2.912

Review 3.  Why geese benefit from the transition from natural vegetation to agriculture.

Authors:  Anthony D Fox; Kenneth F Abraham
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 5.129

4.  Hydrology-driven responses of herbivorous geese in relation to changes in food quantity and quality.

Authors:  Pingyang Zhang; Ye-Ai Zou; Yonghong Xie; Siqi Zhang; Xinsheng Chen; Feng Li; Zhengmiao Deng; Hong Zhang; Wei Tu
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  Winter coexistence in herbivorous waterbirds: Niche differentiation in a floodplain, Poyang Lake, China.

Authors:  Junpeng Bai; Huan Zhang; Hongkang Zhou; Shu Li; Bin Gao; Peng Chen; Long Ma; Zhifeng Xu; Zhen Zhang; Changxin Xu; Luzhang Ruan; Gang Ge
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  Effect of conservation efforts and ecological variables on waterbird population sizes in wetlands of the Yangtze River.

Authors:  Yong Zhang; Qiang Jia; Herbert H T Prins; Lei Cao; Willem Frederik de Boer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.