Literature DB >> 28547091

Constraints on herbivory by grizzly bears.

Karyn D Rode1, Charles T Robbins1, Lisa A Shipley2.   

Abstract

Although well known as carnivores and not capable of digesting plant fiber, grizzly bears (Ursus arctos horribilis) consume over 200 species of plants and are entirely vegetarian in some ecosystems. Even in ecosystems with abundant meat resources, green vegetation can be an important seasonal food resource. Therefore, we examined the morphological, physiological, and environmental constraints that determine the nutritional value of herbaceous vegetation to grizzly bears. Short-term, board foraging trials were used with captive grizzly bears to determine constraints on intake rate including bite size, bite rate, bear size, plant species, plant height, and plant distribution. Feeding trials were conducted to determine the effect of protein level (12-35%) and digestible dry matter intake on weight gain. Finally, maximum daily intake, daily foraging time, and weight change were measured for captive bears foraging on highly abundant and nutritious forbs and grasses during 12-day trials. Intake during short-term board trials overestimated the intake of freely foraging bears from two- to seven-fold depending on bear size. Because of their relatively larger bite sizes, smaller absolute energy requirements, and relatively larger intake capacity, smaller bears (<120 kg) made greater weight gains than very large bears on herbaceous vegetation. Smaller bears with ad libitum access to palatable, nutritious forbs gained weight at rates equal to wild bears. However, depending upon plant characteristics, bite sizes and available daily foraging time increasingly prevented large bears (>120 kg) from gaining weight on herbaceous vegetation. Both captive and wild bears select forbs over grasses at similar growth stages because forbs are generally higher in protein and more digestible than grasses. Therefore, the nutritional well-being of wild grizzly bears could be improved in areas where bears are largely herbivorous and, thus, relatively small by purposefully managing for nutritious forbs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dietary protein; Foraging; Grizzly bears; Herbivory; Intake rate; Ursus arctos horribilis

Year:  2001        PMID: 28547091     DOI: 10.1007/s004420100637

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  24 in total

1.  Incorporating concentration dependence in stable isotope mixing models: a response to Phillips and Koch (2002).

Authors:  Charles T Robbins; Grant V Hilderbrand; Sean D Farley
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2002-06-19       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Life in the fat lane: seasonal regulation of insulin sensitivity, food intake, and adipose biology in brown bears.

Authors:  K S Rigano; J L Gehring; B D Evans Hutzenbiler; A V Chen; O L Nelson; C A Vella; C T Robbins; H T Jansen
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 2.200

3.  Staying cool in a changing landscape: the influence of maximum daily ambient temperature on grizzly bear habitat selection.

Authors:  Karine E Pigeon; Etienne Cardinal; Gordon B Stenhouse; Steeve D Côté
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2016-04-16       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Fast carnivores and slow herbivores: differential foraging strategies among grizzly bears in the Canadian Arctic.

Authors:  Mark A Edwards; Andrew E Derocher; Keith A Hobson; Marsha Branigan; John A Nagy
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2010-12-12       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Changing lanes: seasonal differences in cellular metabolism of adipocytes in grizzly bears (Ursus arctos horribilis).

Authors:  Hannah R Hapner Hogan; Brandon D E Hutzenbiler; Charles T Robbins; Heiko T Jansen
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 2.200

6.  Biomechanical consequences of rapid evolution in the polar bear lineage.

Authors:  Graham J Slater; Borja Figueirido; Leeann Louis; Paul Yang; Blaire Van Valkenburgh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-11-05       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Gaining insight into the assimilated diet of small bear populations by stable isotope analysis.

Authors:  Giulio Careddu; Paolo Ciucci; Stella Mondovì; Edoardo Calizza; Loreto Rossi; Maria Letizia Costantini
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Physiological consequences of consuming low-energy foods: herbivory coincides with a stress response in Yellowstone bears.

Authors:  David Christianson; Tyler H Coleman; Quint Doan; Mark A Haroldson
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 3.079

9.  Does learning or instinct shape habitat selection?

Authors:  Scott E Nielsen; Aaron B A Shafer; Mark S Boyce; Gordon B Stenhouse
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Brown bear body mass and growth in northern and southern Europe.

Authors:  Jon E Swenson; Miha Adamic; Djuro Huber; Sigbjørn Stokke
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2007-04-06       Impact factor: 3.298

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.