Literature DB >> 28547085

Variation in measured values of photosynthetic quantum yield in ecophysiological studies.

Eric L Singsaas1, Donald R Ort2, Evan H DeLucia1.   

Abstract

Photosynthetic efficiency is often quantified as the light-limited, maximum quantum yield in ecophysiological studies. Four published comparative studies report that photosynthetic efficiency varies little among plant species of widely diverse origins, and that quantum yields were near the maximum theoretically attainable value. However, many other published studies contradict this conclusion, reporting quantum yields as low as 30% of those found in the comparative studies. These studies have created the impression that certain plants, particularly wild plants growing outdoors, may have intrinsically low photosynthetic efficiencies. To investigate the validity of these differing interpretations, we compiled quantum yield data from a survey of 30 published studies and compared those with data from the two most comprehensive comparative quantum yield studies. We also included quantum yield observations that we made on ten species. While our data confirm the results of the comparative studies indicating that maximum quantum yield is high and invariant, the literature survey data showed a wide range of quantum yield values. To investigate whether low quantum yield values could be caused by data collection and analysis techniques, we analyzed photosynthetic light-response data. Substantial underestimation of quantum yield could result from including in the calculation data extending beyond the linear region of the photosynthetic light response. In some cases quantum yield measurements can be influenced by changing levels of intercellular CO2 during measurements. We conclude that many quantum yield values reported in the literature are affected by one or more of these errors, and the intrinsic efficiency of photosynthesis is mostly invariant among C3 plants. This emphasizes the importance of the measurement and data analysis protocols in obtaining accurate and reliable quantum yield data.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CO2 assimilation; O2 evolution; Photosynthesis; Quantum yield; Sun/shade

Year:  2001        PMID: 28547085     DOI: 10.1007/s004420000624

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  13 in total

1.  Becoming less tolerant with age: sugar maple, shade, and ontogeny.

Authors:  Kerrie M Sendall; Christopher H Lusk; Peter B Reich
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2015-08-30       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Ecological filtering by a dominant herb selects for shade tolerance in the tree seedling community of coastal dune forest.

Authors:  Zivanai Tsvuura; Megan E Griffiths; Richard M Gunton; Peter J Franks; Michael J Lawes
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Accounting for the decrease of photosystem photochemical efficiency with increasing irradiance to estimate quantum yield of leaf photosynthesis.

Authors:  Xinyou Yin; Daniel W Belay; Peter E L van der Putten; Paul C Struik
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2014-08-23       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Size-related shifts in carbon gain and growth responses to light differ among rainforest evergreens of contrasting shade tolerance.

Authors:  Kerrie M Sendall; Peter B Reich; Christopher H Lusk
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Geometrical similarity analysis of photosynthetic light response curves, light saturation and light use efficiency.

Authors:  Kohei Koyama; Kihachiro Kikuzawa
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Interspecific variation in leaf traits, photosynthetic light response, and whole-plant productivity in amaranths (Amaranthus spp. L.).

Authors:  Mildred Osei-Kwarteng; Emmanuel Ayipio; Dany Moualeu-Ngangue; Gerhard Buck-Sorlin; Hartmut Stützel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 3.752

7.  Rapid Chlorophyll a Fluorescence Light Response Curves Mechanistically Inform Photosynthesis Modeling.

Authors:  Jonathan R Pleban; Carmela R Guadagno; David S Mackay; Cynthia Weinig; Brent E Ewers
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 8.340

8.  Measurement of Gross Photosynthesis, Respiration in the Light, and Mesophyll Conductance Using H218O Labeling.

Authors:  Paul P G Gauthier; Mark O Battle; Kevin L Griffin; Michael L Bender
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 8.340

9.  Leaf phenology and seasonal variation of photosynthesis of invasive Berberis thunbergii (Japanese barberry) and two co-occurring native understory shrubs in a northeastern United States deciduous forest.

Authors:  Cheng-Yuan Xu; Kevin L Griffin; W S F Schuster
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2007-07-24       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Competition between isoprene emission and pigment synthesis during leaf development in aspen.

Authors:  Bahtijor Rasulov; Irina Bichele; Agu Laisk; Ülo Niinemets
Journal:  Plant Cell Environ       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 7.228

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.