Literature DB >> 28547058

Which functional processes control the short-term effect of grazing on net primary production in grasslands?

H Leriche1, X LeRoux2, J Gignoux1, A Tuzet3, H Fritz4, L Abbadie1, M Loreau1.   

Abstract

Grazing has traditionally been viewed as detrimental to plant growth, but it has been proposed that under certain conditions, grazing may lead to compensatory or overcompensatory growth. However, comprehensive information on the relative role of the main functional processes controlling the response of net primary production (NPP) to grazing is still lacking. In this study, a modelling approach was used to quantify the relative importance of key functional processes in the response of annual canopy NPP to grazing for a West African humid grassland. The PEPSEE-grass model, which represents radiation absorption, NPP, water balance and carbon allocation, was used to compute total and aboveground NPP in response to grazing pressure. Representations of grazing and mineral nitrogen input to the canopy were simplified to focus on the vegetation processes implemented and their relative importance. Simulations were performed using a constant or resource-driven root/shoot allocation coefficient, and dependence or independence of conversion efficiency of absorbed light into dry matter on nitrogen availability. There were three main results. Firstly, the response of NPP to grazing intensity emerged as a complex result of both positive and negative, and direct and indirect effects of biomass removal on light absorption efficiency, soil water availability, grass nitrogen status and productivity, and root/shoot allocation pattern. Secondly, overcompensation was observed for aboveground NPP when assuming a nitrogen-dependent conversion efficiency and a resource-driven root/shoot allocation. Thirdly, the response of NPP to grazing was mainly controlled by the effect of plant nitrogen status on conversion efficiency and by the root/shoot allocation pattern, while the effects of improved water status and reduced light absorption were secondary.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Herbivory; Nitrogen; Overcompensation; Root/shoot allocation; Soil moisture

Year:  2001        PMID: 28547058     DOI: 10.1007/s004420100697

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  5 in total

1.  Morphophysiology of forage peanut submitted to different intensities of defoliation on grazing with sheep.

Authors:  Olmar Antônio Denardin Costa; Otoniel Geter Lauz Ferreira; Douglas Sampaio Henrique; Ricardo Zambarda Vaz; Ana Carolina Fluck; Wagner Paris; Alexsandro Bahr Kröning; Luis Alberto Alonzo Griffith; Oscar Ivan Tuz Matos
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 1.559

2.  Stimulation of soil nitrification and denitrification by grazing in grasslands: do changes in plant species composition matter?

Authors:  X Le Roux; M Bardy; P Loiseau; F Louault
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2003-09-04       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  The interactive effects of mowing and N addition did not weaken soil net N mineralization rates in semi-arid grassland of Northern China.

Authors:  Yükun Luo; Changhui Wang; Yan Shen; Wei Sun; Kuanhu Dong
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-09-17       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Carbon variation of dry grasslands in Central Asia in response to climate controls and grazing appropriation.

Authors:  Shihua Zhu; Xi Chen; Chi Zhang; Xia Fang; Liangzhong Cao
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 5.190

5.  Effects of different grazing intensities on grassland production in China: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Liang Yan; Guangsheng Zhou; Feng Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.