| Literature DB >> 28546816 |
Fardin Yousefshahi1,2, Fatemeh Davari-Tanha3, Atabak Najafi4, Mahbod Kaveh5, Mohsen Rezaei Hemami6, Patricia Khashayar7, Mohammad Anbarafshan4.
Abstract
Objective: To assess the association between intrapartum intrathecal opioid use and breastfeeding and weight gain following cesarean section. Materials and methods: The prospective double-blinded study was conducted on term pregnant women, undergoing elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. They divided into two groups. In the first group, intrathecal Morphine was used to achieve analgesia during or after the operation. The remainder divided into two subgroups, those who did not receive any opioid or those received systemic opioids. Following labor breastfeeding accessed in a follow-up, two month latter.Entities:
Keywords: Breastfeeding; Cesarean Section; Intrathecal Opioid; Spinal
Year: 2016 PMID: 28546816 PMCID: PMC5440816
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Family Reprod Health ISSN: 1735-9392
Figure 1CONSORT chart of the study
comparing quantitative variables between spinal and non-spinal groups
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||
|
|
| ||
| Mother Age (year) | 28.56 ± (5.58) | 27.83 ± (5.05) | 0.305 |
| Mother Weight (kg) | 77.87 ± (13.70) | 76.43 ± (12.74) | 0.421 |
| Mother Height (cm) | 161.51 ± (5.52) | 160.24 ± (6.15) | 0.122 |
| Mother BMI | 29.80 ± (4.70) | 29.83 ± (4.77) | 0.960 |
| Gravid | 2.10 ± (0.94) | 2.22 ± (1.08) | 0.401 |
| Para | 1.94 ± (0.85) | 2.08 ± (0.93) | 0.230 |
| Number of Children | 0.96 ± (0.88) | 1.10 ± (0.94) | 0.288 |
| Pregnancy Age (year) | 38.61 ± (1.11) | 38.85 ± (1.24) | 0.151 |
| APGAR in 1 minute | 8.94 ± (0.37) | 8.96 ± (0.23) | 0.602 |
| APGAR in 5 minute | 10.00 ± (0.00) | 9.98 ± (0.17) | 0.351 |
| Weight of Neonate (g) | 3206.87 ± (389.09) | 3227.73 ± (430.40) | 0.715 |
| Lactogenic Medication | 1.51 ± (0.50) | 1.57 ± (0.50) | 0.413 |
| Weight of Neonate at 2 month age (g) | 5048.73 ± (962.93) | 5295.48 ± (803.95) | 0.036 |
Body Mass Index
comparing categorical variables between spinal and non-spinal groups
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||
| Job | Housewife | 74(92.5%) | 152 (89.4%) | 0.499 |
| Education grad | Primary school | 22 (27.8%) | 65 (38.7%) | 0.228 |
| Primary to high school | 48 (60.8%) | 84 (50.0%0 | ||
| University | 9 (11.4%) | 19 (11.3%) | ||
| Breastfeeding History | 35 (43.8%) | 84 (49.4%) | 0.419 | |
| Gender of Neonate | Male | 44 (55.0%) | 87 (51.2%) | 0.590 |
| Female | 36 (45.0%) | 83 (48.8%) | ||
| Ward | Mothers | 72 (90.0%) | 142 (83.5%) | 0.246 |
| High Risk | 8 (10.0%) | 28 (16.5%) | ||
| Diabetes mellitus or Gestational Diabetes | 6 (7.5%) | 15 (8.8%) | 0.811 | |
| Lactogenic medication | 39 (48.8%) | 72 (42.6%) | 0.413 | |
| Feeding rout in two month age | Breastfeeding | 54 (67.5%) | 121 (71.2%) | 0.725 |
| formula | 4 (5.0%) | 10 (5.9%) | ||
| Combination of Breastfeeding and formula | 22 (27.5%) | 39 (22.9%) | ||
| Completely formula feeding in two month age | 4 (5.0%) | 10 (5.1%) | 0.518 | |
chi square test was used
Independent variables which affect feeding at two month of age
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| neonate gender | 0.105 | 0.33 | 0.88-1.26 |
| lactogenic medications use | 0.064 | 0.28 | 0.07-1.07 |
Independent variables which affect neonatal weight at two month of age
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spinal vs. non-spinal anesthesia | 0.009 | 327.12 | 84.08- 570.15 |
| neonatal weight at birth | 0.000 | 0.75 | 0.47- 1.03 |
| lactogenic medications use | 0.020 | -276.99 | 43.51- 510.48 |