Literature DB >> 28546486

Draft Genome Sequences of Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli O103 Strains Isolated from Feces of Feedlot Cattle.

Lance W Noll1, Jay N Worley2, Xun Yang2, Pragathi B Shridhar1, Jianfa Bai3, Jianghong Meng2, Doina Caragea4, T G Nagaraja5.   

Abstract

Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) pathotype represents a minor proportion of E. coli O103 strains shed in the feces of feedlot cattle. The draft genome sequences of 13 strains of EPEC O103 are reported here. The availability of the genome sequences will help in the assessment of genetic diversity and virulence potential of bovine EPEC O103.
Copyright © 2017 Noll et al.

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 28546486      PMCID: PMC5477399          DOI: 10.1128/genomeA.00387-17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome Announc


GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

Cattle serve as a reservoir for enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC), including the EPEC O103 serogroup (1). The organisms are harbored in the hindgut of cattle and shed in the feces. Human infection is mostly associated with children and can occur following fecal-oral transmission of EPEC through direct contact or via contaminated food or water (2). Although considered a major diarrheagenic pathogen in developing countries (3), EPEC infections are not common in the United States; however, outbreaks have been reported (4, 5). Unlike enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC), EPEC strains do not carry Shiga toxin genes (stx1 and/or stx2), yet they share many important virulence genes with EHEC (6). Similar to EHEC, EPEC strains are positive for the locus of enterocyte and effacement (LEE)-carried intimin gene (eae), which together with other LEE-carried genes can cause microvillus destruction during human infection, resulting in the characteristic attaching and effacing lesions (7). Strains within the EPEC pathotype are further characterized as typical or atypical, depending on presence or absence, respectively, of the EPEC adherence factor plasmid (8). Although EHEC O103 has been genetically characterized (9, 10), less is known about EPEC O103. Söderlund et al. (11) published the genomes of nine EPEC O103 strains isolated from feces of cattle in Sweden, which to our knowledge, remain the only publicly available sequences to date. Here, we report the whole-genome draft sequences of 13 strains of atypical EPEC O103 (12 O103:H2 strains and 1 O103:H11 strain) isolated from the feces of feedlot cattle in the United States (1). The DNeasy blood and tissue kit with the QIAcube robotic workstation (Qiagen, Germantown, MD) were used to extract DNA from overnight cultures of each bacterial strain. Genomes were sequenced using an Illumina MiSeq platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA), and genome libraries were constructed using the Nextera XT DNA library preparation kit and MiSeq reagent kits version 2 (500 cycles) (Illumina, Inc.). De novo genome assembly was performed using SPAdes version 3.6.0 (12). The accession numbers for each strain identification (ID), along with the genome size and number of contigs per genome, are summarized in Table 1.
TABLE 1 

Characteristics of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli O103 strains isolated from feces of feedlot cattle

StrainSerotypeGenome size (bp)No. of contigsAccession no.
UMDKSU-2013-3-73AO103:H25,165,309150MVKZ00000000
UMDKSU-2013-3-98BO103:H25,282,670258MVLA00000000
UMDKSU-2013-3-109DO103:H25,333,739268MVLB00000000
UMDKSU-2013-3-141EO103:H25,254,213218MVLC00000000
UMDKSU-2013-3-134AO103:H25,187,748199MVLD00000000
UMDKSU-2013-3-435BO103:H25,211,713220MVLE00000000
UMDKSU-2013-3-492AO103:H115,674,533406MVLF00000000
UMDKSU-2013-3-296DO103:H25,155,875137MVLG00000000
UMDKSU-2013-3-331CO103:H25,239,618191MVLH00000000
UMDKSU-2013-3-416CO103:H25,188,193176MVLI00000000
UMDKSU-2013-3-533BO103:H25,210,719212MVLJ00000000
UMDKSU-2013-3-536FO103:H25,205,112200MVLK00000000
UMDKSU-2013-3-526EO103:H25,235,857218MVLL00000000
Characteristics of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli O103 strains isolated from feces of feedlot cattle The publication of the sequences of these 13 strains will contribute to the currently limited amount of publicly available sequence data on EPEC O103. These genomes will allow for investigations into the genetic similarities and differences of EPEC O103 strains to other major E. coli pathotype-serogroup combinations, including EHEC O103. They will also serve as a valuable resource toward the study of EPEC O103 genome evolution.

Accession number(s).

This whole-genome shotgun project has been deposited at DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under the accession numbers listed in Table 1.
  11 in total

1.  SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing.

Authors:  Anton Bankevich; Sergey Nurk; Dmitry Antipov; Alexey A Gurevich; Mikhail Dvorkin; Alexander S Kulikov; Valery M Lesin; Sergey I Nikolenko; Son Pham; Andrey D Prjibelski; Alexey V Pyshkin; Alexander V Sirotkin; Nikolay Vyahhi; Glenn Tesler; Max A Alekseyev; Pavel A Pevzner
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 1.479

2.  Genetic and phenotypic analysis of Escherichia coli with enteropathogenic characteristics isolated from Seattle children.

Authors:  T N Bokete; T S Whittam; R A Wilson; C R Clausen; C M O'Callahan; S L Moseley; T R Fritsche; P I Tarr
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 5.226

3.  Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli strains isolated from dairy products - Genetic diversity and virulence gene profiles.

Authors:  T Douëllou; S Delannoy; S Ganet; P Mariani-Kurkdjian; P Fach; E Loukiadis; Mc Montel; D Thevenot-Sergentet
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 5.277

4.  Molecular characterization reveals three distinct clonal groups among clinical shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli strains of serogroup O103.

Authors:  Atsushi Iguchi; Sunao Iyoda; Makoto Ohnishi
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 5.  Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli.

Authors:  J P Nataro; J B Kaper
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 26.132

6.  Attaching and effacing activities of rabbit and human enteropathogenic Escherichia coli in pig and rabbit intestines.

Authors:  H W Moon; S C Whipp; R A Argenzio; M M Levine; R A Giannella
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 3.441

7.  An outbreak of foodborne illness caused by Escherichia coli O39:NM, an agent not fitting into the existing scheme for classifying diarrheogenic E. coli.

Authors:  C W Hedberg; S J Savarino; J M Besser; C J Paulus; V M Thelen; L J Myers; D N Cameron; T J Barrett; J B Kaper; M T Osterholm
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 5.226

8.  A Comparison of Culture- and PCR-Based Methods to Detect Six Major Non-O157 Serogroups of Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli in Cattle Feces.

Authors:  Lance W Noll; Pragathi B Shridhar; Diana M Dewsbury; Xiaorong Shi; Natalia Cernicchiaro; David G Renter; T G Nagaraja
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Genomic comparison of Escherichia coli serotype O103:H2 isolates with and without verotoxin genes: implications for risk assessment of strains commonly found in ruminant reservoirs.

Authors:  Robert Söderlund; Julie Hurel; Tomas Jinnerot; Camilla Sekse; Anna Aspán; Erik Eriksson; Erik Bongcam-Rudloff
Journal:  Infect Ecol Epidemiol       Date:  2016-02-16

Review 10.  Pathogens associated with persistent diarrhoea in children in low and middle income countries: systematic review.

Authors:  Katharine Abba; Rebecca Sinfield; C Anthony Hart; Paul Garner
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 3.090

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.