Literature DB >> 28546474

Draft Genome Sequence of Rhodococcus sp. Strain 66b.

Louise F Thatcher1, Cindy A Myers2, Cathryn A O'Sullivan2, Margaret M Roper2.   

Abstract

We report here the draft genome sequence and annotation of Rhodococcus sp. strain 66b isolated from the soil of southwest Western Australia. This strain exhibits a range of bioactivities, including plant growth promotion, biosurfactant production, and wax degradation. Whole-genome sequencing was conducted to uncover the underlying mechanisms.
Copyright © 2017 Thatcher et al.

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 28546474      PMCID: PMC5477387          DOI: 10.1128/genomeA.00229-17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome Announc


GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

Within the Actinobacteria phylum, species from the genus Rhodococcus are significant for their bioremediation and industrial applications, for example, the production of enzymes or metabolites involved in degradation of organic compounds or the production of biosurfactants or bioflocculants (1). We isolated and purified Rhodococcus sp. strain 66b from naturally water-repellent soils based on its wax-degrading ability and further assessed it for biosurfactant production based on surface tension assays (2). The production of biosurfactants was associated with its potential to degrade waxes that cause water repellency in sandy soils. Sequencing of 16S rRNA designated strain 66b a Rhodococcus species (2, 3). DNA for whole-genome sequencing was extracted from mycelia and coccoid/rod-shaped fragments using a Mo Bio PowerLyzer UltraClean microbial DNA isolation kit, followed by preparation of an indexed Illumina TruSeq library (350-bp insert) and sequencing using 150-bp paired-end reads on an Illumina MiSeq instrument by the Australian Genome Research Facility (AGRF), Melbourne, Australia. A total of 0.48 Gbp of raw data were generated from a sequence run using approximately 1/10 of a sequencing lane. Reads were assessed for quality, trimmed [CutAdapt (4)], and sorted as per Thatcher et al. (5), and overlapping reads were merged using FLASH (version 1.2.11) (6). De novo assembly of reads (paired-end, singletons, merged) was performed using SPAdes (version 3.9.0) (7) with the “--careful” option and k-mer lengths of 21, 33, 55, and 77. Contigs less than 1,000 bp were removed. The 66b genome was assembled into 6.68 Mbp (57 scaffolds; N50 count, 7 scaffolds; N50 length, 0.38 Mb), with a G+C content of 62.3%. Coding sequences, functional annotation, and secondary metabolite biosynthesis gene clusters were predicted by Prokka (version 1.11) (8) [incorporating Prodigal (version 2.6.3) (9)], Blast2GO (version 1.0.2) (10), and antiSMASH (version 3.0.5.1) (11), respectively. Blast2GO (10) best BLAST hits analysis for species comparisons revealed the closest neighbor strain for 66b to be Rhodococcus erythropolis. Genome annotation by Prokka (8) allowed for the identification of 6,359 coding sequences and 54 tRNAs within the 66b genome. Prediction of secondary metabolite clusters by antiSMASH (11) suggested the 66b genome harbors at least 18 biosynthetic gene clusters, of which 7 are nonribosomal peptide synthetases. Other biosynthetic gene clusters include 2 polyketide synthases and a bacteriocin, ectoine, terpene, and butyrolactone cluster, suggesting its potential to produce metabolites contributing to its bioactivities and potential to improve soil wettability.

Accession number(s).

This whole-genome shotgun project has been deposited at DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under the accession no. MUZB00000000. The version described in this paper is version MUZB01000000.
  8 in total

1.  SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing.

Authors:  Anton Bankevich; Sergey Nurk; Dmitry Antipov; Alexey A Gurevich; Mikhail Dvorkin; Alexander S Kulikov; Valery M Lesin; Sergey I Nikolenko; Son Pham; Andrey D Prjibelski; Alexey V Pyshkin; Alexander V Sirotkin; Nikolay Vyahhi; Glenn Tesler; Max A Alekseyev; Pavel A Pevzner
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 1.479

Review 2.  Taxonomy, Physiology, and Natural Products of Actinobacteria.

Authors:  Essaid Ait Barka; Parul Vatsa; Lisa Sanchez; Nathalie Gaveau-Vaillant; Cedric Jacquard; Jan P Meier-Kolthoff; Hans-Peter Klenk; Christophe Clément; Yder Ouhdouch; Gilles P van Wezel
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 11.056

3.  FLASH: fast length adjustment of short reads to improve genome assemblies.

Authors:  Tanja Magoč; Steven L Salzberg
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation.

Authors:  Torsten Seemann
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification.

Authors:  Doug Hyatt; Gwo-Liang Chen; Philip F Locascio; Miriam L Land; Frank W Larimer; Loren J Hauser
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-03-08       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Blast2GO: a universal tool for annotation, visualization and analysis in functional genomics research.

Authors:  Ana Conesa; Stefan Götz; Juan Miguel García-Gómez; Javier Terol; Manuel Talón; Montserrat Robles
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2005-08-04       Impact factor: 6.937

7.  The Arabidopsis KH-Domain RNA-Binding Protein ESR1 Functions in Components of Jasmonate Signalling, Unlinking Growth Restraint and Resistance to Stress.

Authors:  Louise F Thatcher; Lars G Kamphuis; James K Hane; Luis Oñate-Sánchez; Karam B Singh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  antiSMASH 3.0-a comprehensive resource for the genome mining of biosynthetic gene clusters.

Authors:  Tilmann Weber; Kai Blin; Srikanth Duddela; Daniel Krug; Hyun Uk Kim; Robert Bruccoleri; Sang Yup Lee; Michael A Fischbach; Rolf Müller; Wolfgang Wohlleben; Rainer Breitling; Eriko Takano; Marnix H Medema
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 16.971

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.