Literature DB >> 28546320

A cohort mortality study of lead-exposed workers in the USA, Finland and the UK.

Kyle Steenland1, Vaughn Barry1, Ahti Anttila2, Markku Sallmén3, Damien McElvenny4, A C Todd5, Kurt Straif6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate further whether inorganic lead is a carcinogen among adults, or associated with increased blood pressure and kidney damage, via a large mortality study.
METHODS: We conducted internal analyses via Cox regression of mortality in three cohorts of lead-exposed workers with blood lead (BL) data (USA, Finland, UK), including over 88 000 workers and over 14 000 deaths. Our exposure metric was maximum BL. We also conducted external analyses using country-specific background rates.
RESULTS: The combined cohort had a median BL of 26 µg/dL, a mean first-year BL test of 1990 and was 96% male. Fifty per cent had more than one BL test (mean 7). Significant (p<0.05) positive trends, using the log of each worker's maximum BL, were found for lung cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), stroke and heart disease, while borderline significant trends (0.05≤p≤0.10) were found for bladder cancer, brain cancer and larynx cancer. Most results were consistent across all three cohorts. In external comparisons, we found significantly elevated SMRs for those with BLs>40 µg/dL; for bladder, lung and larynx cancer; and for COPD. In a small subsample of the US cohort (n=115) who were interviewed, we found no association between smoking and BL.
CONCLUSIONS: We found strong positive mortality trends, with increasing BL level, for several outcomes in internal analysis. Many of these outcomes are associated with smoking, for which we had no data. A borderline trend was found for brain cancer, not associated with smoking. © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cancer; lead; occupation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28546320     DOI: 10.1136/oemed-2017-104311

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Occup Environ Med        ISSN: 1351-0711            Impact factor:   4.402


  5 in total

Review 1.  Reducing occupational lead exposures: Strengthened standards for a healthy workforce.

Authors:  Rachel M Shaffer; Steven G Gilbert
Journal:  Neurotoxicology       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 4.294

2.  A Case Study of Brass Foundry Workers' Estimated Lead (Pb) Body Burden from Different Exposure Routes.

Authors:  Anneli Julander; Klara Midander; Sandra Garcia-Garcia; Per Vihlborg; Pål Graff
Journal:  Ann Work Expo Health       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 2.179

3.  Blood lead level and risk of hypertension in the United States National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999-2016.

Authors:  Man Fung Tsoi; Chris Wai Hang Lo; Tommy Tsang Cheung; Bernard Man Yung Cheung
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  Interpretation of Population Health Metrics: Environmental Lead Exposure as Exemplary Case.

Authors:  Jan A Staessen; Lutgarde Thijs; Wen-Yi Yang; Cai-Guo Yu; Fang-Fei Wei; Harry A Roels; Tim S Nawrot; Zhen-Yu Zhang
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 10.190

5.  Blood lead levels and lung cancer mortality: An updated analysis of NHANES II and III.

Authors:  Jongeun Rhee; Barry I Graubard; Mark P Purdue
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 4.452

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.